The Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) entails a sweeping redefinition of the field of strategic studies, one that rhymes with sea changes experienced in a wide domain of other realms. The RMA can be viewed as a synergetic bundle of concepts that is marked by technological change, social reorganization, and sometimes by a new system of thought, among other features. It is this synergy between various components of the RMA that has underpinned the strategic victories and losses for assorted social forces in Colombia and Mexico, and that best explains the transformation of security themes in both countries. While the RMA is usually discussed in relation to Middle Eastern politics or the military adventures of “great powers,” this book veers off the beaten track to examine the manifestation of the RMA in two of the most strategically important countries in Latin America.


Transnational Crime Information Warfare Military Affair Nonstate Actor Private Security Company 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Miguel Cervantes, Don Quixote (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 71.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    For an excellent historical discussion of the RMA, see Andrew Latham, Understanding the RMA: Braudelian Insights into the Transformation of Warfare (Geneva: Programme for Strategic Studies and International Security Studies, 1999); andGoogle Scholar
  3. Azar Gat, The Origins of Military Thought from Enlightenment to Clausewitz (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    See Andrew F. Krepinevich, “Calvary to Computer: The Patterns of Military Revolutions,” The National Interest, #37, Fall 1994, p. 33.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    See Michael Dartness, “Insurgency Online,” Small Wars and Insurgencies, vol. 10, #3, Winter 1999, p. 129.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, ed. Robert Strassler (New York: Free Press, 1996), p. 43.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (New York: Vintage, 1970), p. 387.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Michel Foucault, Remarks on Marx (New York: Semiotext(e), 1991).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Homer, Iliad (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1995), pp. 31–33 and 43.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Ibid., p. 9.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Ibid., p. 17.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    See, for example, Lothar Ibugger, “The Revolution in Military Affairs,” NATO Parliamentary Assembly Paper, November 1998, pp. 5–10; and Latham, Understanding the RMA. Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    See the excellent discussion by Michael Dillon and Julian Reid, “Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War,” Millennium, vol. 30, #1, 2004, p. 44.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    For a good discussion of asymmetric warfare and the RMA, see Jeremy Black, “War and Strategy in the 21st Century,” Orbis, vol. 46, #1, Winter 2002, pp. 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 17.
    See Dirk Kruijt and Kees Koonings, “Introduction: Violence and Fear in Latin America,” in Societies of Fear: The Legacy of Civil War, Violence and Terror in Latin America, ed. Kruijt and Koonings (London: Zed, 1999), p. 11.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    See, for example, Thomas Adams, “The Real Military Revolution,” Parameters, vol. 30, #3, Autumn 2000, pp 54–65, especially p. 54.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    Michel Foucault, History of Sexuality (New York: Vintage, 1978), p. 86.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    See Alejandro Portes and Kelly Hoffman, “Latin American Class Structures: Their Composition and Change during the Neoliberal Era,” Latin American Research Review, vol. 38, #1, 2003, pp. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 21.
    See R.B.J. Walker, Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  21. 25.
    See, for example, Sun Tzu II, The Lost Art of War (San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1996), p. 67.Google Scholar
  22. 26.
    See Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince (New York: Mentor, 1980), p. 86. For a discussion of class conflict, see alsoGoogle Scholar
  23. Machiavelli, The Discourses (New York: Penguin, 1970), especially pp. 111–118.Google Scholar
  24. 27.
    Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (New York: Penguin, 1982), p. 192.Google Scholar
  25. 28.
    Ibid., p. 193.Google Scholar
  26. 29.
    Charles Dokubo, “An Army for Rent, Private Military Corporations,” Civil Wars, vol. 3, #2, Summer 2000, p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 34.
    Tony Lynch, “The Good Mercenary?” Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 8, #2, 2000, p. 133 (see broader article for good overall discussion, pp. 133–153).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 35.
    See Eugene Smith, “The New Condotieri and US Policy: The Privatization of Conflict and Its Implications,” Parameters, vol. 32, #4, Winter 2002–2003, p. 106.Google Scholar
  29. 36.
    See William Caferro, Mercenary Companies and the Decline of Siena (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), p. xiii.Google Scholar
  30. 38.
    See Guy Arnold, Mercenaries: The Scourge of the Third World (New York: St. Martins, 1999), pp. x–xi.Google Scholar
  31. 42.
    See Abdel-Fatua and J. Kayode Fayemi, eds., Mercenaries: An African Security Dilemma (London: Pluto, 2000), p. 77.Google Scholar
  32. 43.
    See, for example, David Francis, “Mercenary Intervention in Sierra Leone: Providing National Security or International Exploitation?” Third World Quarterly, vol. 20, #2, 1999, pp. 319–339;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pratap Chatterjee, “Guarding the Multinationals,” Multinational Monitor, vol. 19, #3, March 1998, pp. 1–5; andGoogle Scholar
  34. Doug Brooks, “Messiahs or Mercenaries?” International Peacekeeping, vol. 7, #4, Winter 2000, pp. 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 44.
    First quote from Anthony Mockler, The New Mercenaries (London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1985), p. 5; second quote fromGoogle Scholar
  36. Carlos Escude, Mercenarios del fin del Milenio (Buenos Aires: Editorial Belgrano, 1999), p. 15.Google Scholar
  37. 46.
    See, for example, William Avilés, Global Capitalism, Democracy, and Civil-Military Relations in Colombia (Albany: SUNY, 2006), pp. 106–107.Google Scholar
  38. 47.
    A UN resolution was passed when the United States showed no inclination to heed the World Court’s ruling of 27 June 1986 that U.S. support for the Contras was illegal. For a discussion of this, see James Rochlin, Discovering the Americas: The Evolution of Canadian Foreign Policy towards Latin America (Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press, 1994), pp. 157–158.Google Scholar
  39. 48.
    See, for example, Roberto Bardini, Monjes, mercenarias y mercaderes: La red secreta de apoyo a los contras (Mexico City: Mex-Sur Editorial, 1988), pp. 7 and 26–27.Google Scholar
  40. 50.
    For an excellent feminist perspective to the notion of consumption, see V. Spike Peterson, A Critical Rewriting of Global Political Economy (London: Routledge, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 52.
    For a good overview of information warfare, see Timothy Shimeall et al., “Countering Cyber War,” NATO Review, vol. 49, #4, Winter 2001, pp. 16–18.Google Scholar
  42. 53.
    For a broad discussion of the RMA and its relation to market forces, see Steven Metz, “The Next Twist of the RMA,” Parameters, vol. 30, #3, Autumn 2000, pp. 40–53.Google Scholar
  43. 54.
    See, for example, Terry Ryan, “Committing to a Future of ISR Supremacy,” American Intelligence Journal, vol. 21, #1, Spring 2002, pp. 7–16. With regard to the distinction between reconnaissance and surveillance, see pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  44. 55.
    See Jeremy Bentham, The Panopticon Writings, ed. M. Bozovic (London: Verso, 1995), quotes from pp. 34 and 43, respectively.Google Scholar
  45. 56.
    See Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Vintage, 1977), p. 201.Google Scholar
  46. 58.
    For a good discussion of the importance of human intelligence, see Richard Betts, “Fixing Intelligence,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 18, #1, January 2002, pp. 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 62.
    Miyamoto Musashi, The Book of Five Rings (New York: Kodansha, 2001), p. 79.Google Scholar
  48. 63.
    See chapter 6, book 1 of Carl von Clausewitz, On War, ed. Peter Paret (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976), pp. 117–118.Google Scholar
  49. 64.
    See Napoleon, How to Make War (New York: Ediciones La Calavera, 1998), p. 15.Google Scholar
  50. 65.
    See Chris Demchak, “Technology’s Knowledge Burden, the RMA and the IDF: Organizing the Hypertext Organization for Future ‘Wars of Disruption’?” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 24, #2, 2001, pp. 77–147;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Patrick Morgan, “The Impact of the Revolution in Military Affairs,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 23, #1, 2000, pp. 132–163; andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robert Tomes, “Relearning Counterinsurgency Warfare,” Parameters, vol. 19, #1, 2004, pp. 16–28.Google Scholar
  53. 66.
    See Bruce Berkowitz, “Better Ways to Fix US Intelligence,” Orbis, vol. 45, #4, Fall 2001, pp. 609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 67.
    See Thomas Quedensley, “The Commercial Satellite Multispectral Imagery Threat,” American Intelligence Journal, vol. 21, #2, Spring 2002, pp. 33–36.Google Scholar
  55. 68.
  56. 69.
    For further discussion of surveillance and asymmetry, see David Lyon, “An Electronic Panopticon? A Sociological Critique of Surveillance Theory,” Sociological Review, vol. 41, #1, 1993, pp. 653–678.Google Scholar
  57. 70.
    See Robert Gibson, “Space Power, the Revolution in Military Affairs” (Strategic Research Project Paper, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle, PA, 10 April 2001), p. 2.Google Scholar
  58. 72.
    Antoine Henride Jomini, The Art of War (London: Greenhill, 1996), p. 328.Google Scholar
  59. 73.
    Carlos Fuentes, The Burning Mirror (New York: Mariner, 1999), pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
  60. 74.
    See, for example, Dillon and Reid, “Global Liberal Governance”; Richard Ek, “A Revolution in Military Geopolitics?” Political Geography, vol. 19, #7, 2000, pp. 841–874;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Dartness, “Insurgency Online”; Theodor Galdi, “Revolution in Military Affairs? Competing Concepts, Organizational Responses, Outstanding Issues” (paper presented to the Federation of American Scientists, Washington, DC, 11 December 1995), pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
  62. 75.
    For a general discussion of this, see, for example, Keith Hayward, “The Globalization of Defense Industries,” Survival, vol. 43, #2, 2002, pp. 115–132;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Michael Chinworth, “The RMA: A US Business Perspective,” in Managing the Revolution in Military Affairs, ed. Ron Matthews and John Treddenick (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001), pp. 133–155.Google Scholar
  64. 76.
    B. H. Liddell Hart, Strategy (New York: Meridian, 1991), p. 220.Google Scholar
  65. 77.
    Bert Chapman, “Revolution in Military Affairs,” Bulletin of Bibliography, vol. 59, #1, 2002, p. 352.Google Scholar
  66. 78.
    Franz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth (New York: Grove Press, 1963), p. 36.Google Scholar
  67. 79.
    Ibid., p. 73.Google Scholar
  68. 80.
    Ibid., p. 94.Google Scholar
  69. 82.
    Giambattista Vico, The New Science of Giambattista Vico (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976), p. 115.Google Scholar
  70. 83.
    Ibid., p. 336.Google Scholar
  71. 84.
  72. 87.
    Government terror in Latin America has been defined as “beating, killing, robbing, bombing or other assaults on a civilian population, including relatively unusual items such as forced relocation; (2) beating, torturing, or killing of combatants who have indicated a willingness to surrender; (3) the use of weapons which do not sufficiently discriminate among combatants and others.” See Timothy Wickham-Crowley, “Terror and Guerrilla Warfare in Latin America, 1956–1970,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 32, #2, April 1990, p. 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© James F. Rochlin 2007

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations