Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter

Abstract

As countless critics have observed, and as the preceding quote suggests, the late nineteenth-century author Oscar Wilde regarded his own life as an artistic subject. Indeed, he considered that ‘[t]o become a work of art is the object of living’.1 Such categorical statements were frequently made by Wilde and explain the writer’s determination to put his genius ‘into his life’ rather than into his work—a resolution he famously confided to André Gide.2 Wilde’s fascination with the vagaries of image and identity is reflected in the preoccupation with masks, mirrors, and portraits in his literary works. Just as Wilde strove to foster psychological complexity and ambiguity in his writings, he also consciously endeavored to cultivate diversity in his own character with the intention of becoming a symbolic figure, capable of inspiring endless interpretation. With this goal in mind, Wilde astutely exploited the burgeoning media and consumer culture of his time to become a conspicuous public personality.3 Terry Eagleton recently summarized Wilde as ‘a man who saw himself as clay in his own hands’.4 Indeed, Wilde refused to fix or ‘fire’ his personality into any definite form and endeavored to maintain a fluid, malleable identity, consistently rejecting notions of an underlying ‘authentic self. Consequently, Wilde presents a mass of contradictions to those who would try to pin him down; he was at once an Irishman with Republican sympathies who courted the English aristocracy, a Protestant who was deeply fascinated by Catholicism, an effete dandy capable of besting the burliest athletic opponent (in conversational or physical combat), a socialist and an elitist, an optimist and a cynic, a husband, a father and a lover of men.

Art has not forgotten [Thomas Griffiths Wainewright]. He is the hero of Dickens’s Hunted Down, the Varney of Bulwer’s Lucretia; and it is gratifying to note that fiction has paid some homage to one who was so powerful with ‘pen, pencil and poison’. To be suggestive for fiction is to be of more importance than a fact.

Oscar Wilde, ‘Pen, Pencil and Poison’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Oscar Wilde, Epigrams and Aphorisms, ms., William Andrews Clark Memorial Library Archives, University of California, Los Angeles. For an examination of Wilde’s life in performative terms, see, Francesca Coppa, ‘Performance Theory and Performativity’, in Palgrave Advances in Oscar Wilde Studies, ed. Frederick S. Roden (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), pp. 72–95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. André Gide, Oscar Wilde, trans. Bernard Frechtman (New York: Philosophical Library, 1949), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ian Fletcher notes that Wilde ‘exploited and [was] exploited by the new means of communication: the “new journalism” originating in the United States in the earlier 1880s. As a consequence of the acts enforcing compulsory education in England in 1870 and 1874, the new literate masses were let loose on the printed word, and newspapers and magazines were furnished for them, vowed to instant news, instant controversy, instant polarization, and the routine coarsening of issues into personalities’. Ian Fletcher, Aubrey Beardsley, Twayne’s English Authors Series, ed. Herbert Sussman (Boston: Twayne, 1987), p. iv.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Terry Eagleton, ‘The Doubleness of Oscar Wilde’, The Wildean 19 (2001), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oscar Wilde, The Complete Letters of Oscar Wilde, ed. Merlin Holland and Rupert Hart-Davis (London: Fourth Estate, 2000), p. 729.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Some of the scholarly studies that have appeared include Oscar Cargill, ‘Mr. James’s Aesthetic Mr. Nash’, Nineteenth Century Fiction 12.1 (1957); J. H. Miller, ‘Oscar in The Tragic Muse’, Paper presented at The Importance of Being Misunderstood: Homage to Oscar Wilde (Parma: 2000); Tanya Olson, ‘“I Would Be Master Still”: Dracula as the Aftermath of the Wilde Trials and Irish Land League Policies’, Thirdspace 2.1 (2002); Lyall Powers, ‘Mr. James’s Aesthetic Mr. Nash—Again’, Nineteenth Century Fiction 13.1 (1959);

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shelley Salamensky, Difference in a Desert: Julia Constance Fletcher and the Mirage of Oscar Wilde, May 23, 1999, Harvard University, available www.english.upenn.edu/conferences/Travel99/Abstract/Salamenskyhtml, last accessed July 16, 2007; Talia Schaffer, ‘“A Wilde Desire Took Me”: The Homoerotic History of Dracula’, ELH 61.2 (1994); Eric Susser, ‘Unnatural Flower: The Green Carnation and the Threat of Wilde’s Influence’, In-Between: Essays and Studies in Literary Criticism 10.2 (2001);

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stanley Weintraub, ‘Narcissus Exposed: Oscar Wilde and The Green Carnation’, The Green Carnation (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1970). A short review of some of Wilde’s early fictional incarnations can be found in Michael Seeney, ‘The Fictional Career of Oscar Wilde’, The Wildean 9 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. John Stokes, Oscar Wilde: Myths, Miracles, and Imitations (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Tanitch, Oscar Wilde on Stage and Screen (London: Methuen, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robert Ross, ‘A Note of Explanation’, Letters to the Sphinx from Oscar Wilde with Reminiscences of the Author (London: Duckworth, 1930), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. William Amos, The Originals: Who’s Really Who in Fiction (London: Jonathan Cape, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alan Bold and Robert Giddings, True Characters: Real People in Fiction, Longman Pocket Companion Series (Harlow, Essex: Longman, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. David Pringle, Imaginary People: A Who’s Who of Fictional Characters from the Eighteenth Century to the Present Day, 2nd edn. (Aldershot, Hampshire: Scolar, 1996);

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. C. Rintoul, Dictionary of Real People and Places in Fiction (London: Routledge, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merlin Holland, ‘Biography and the Art of Lying’, in The Cambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde, ed. Peter Raby (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jonathan Freedman notes that ‘Roland Barthes … for example, may be read as a deeply Wildean critic, one who both constructed and interpreted himself under the sign of textual desire. Wildean as well are the arguments of American critics Harold Bloom and Geoffrey Hartman for the creative aspects of the critical act. And Wilde’s work anticipates, as Joel Fineman brilliantly suggests, many of the central tenets of both [emphasis in the original] deconstruction and analytic philosophy’. Jonathan Freedman, ‘Introduction: On Oscar Wildes’, in Oscar Wilde: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Jonathan Freedman (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matthew Sweet, Inventing the Victorians (London: Faber and Faber, 2001), p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Richard Ellmann, Oscar Wilde (London: Penguin, 1987), p. 553.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alan Sinfield, The Wilde Century: Effeminacy, Oscar Wilde and the Queer Movement (London: Cassell, 1994), p. vii.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Matthew Sturgis, Aubrey Beardsley: A Biography (London: HarperCollins, 1998), p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ian Small, Oscar Wilde Revalued: An Essay on New Materials and Methods of Research, 1880–1920 British Authors Series (Greenboro: ELT Press, 1993), pp. 2, 174.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Melissa Knox, Oscar Wilde in the 1990s: The Critic as Creator, Studies in English and American Literature, Linguistics and Culture: Literary Criticism in Perspective, ed. James Hardin (Rochester: Camden House, 2001), p. xix.

    Google Scholar 

  24. James C. Simmons, The Novelist as Historian: Essays on the Victorian Historical Novel (The Hague: Mouton, 1973), p. 33.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. K. Jenkins, Re-Thinking History (London: Routledge, 1991), p. 5.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Neil Sammells, Wilde Style: The Plays and Prose of Oscar Wilde (Harlow: Longman, 2000), p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilde, Collins Complete Works of Oscar Wilde (Glasgow: HarperCollins, 1999), p. 1081.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas Wright, ed., Table Talk: Oscar Wilde (London: Cassell, 2000), p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wilde cited in Jacques Daurelle, ‘An English Poet in Paris’, in Oscar Wilde: Interviews and Recollections, vol. 1, ed. E. H. Mikhail (London: Macmillan, 1979), p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas Wright, ‘The Poet in Hell’, The Wildean 20 (2002), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hesketh Pearson, The Life of Oscar Wilde (London: Methuen, 1946), p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Angela Kingston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kingston, A. (2007). Introduction. In: Oscar Wilde as a Character in Victorian Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609358_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics