Skip to main content
  • 68 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between the state and the ethnic minority is an interdisciplinary subject of political science and anthropology. For political science, which is the science of state, issues involving the ethnic minority are primarily concerned with participation and social welfare. This pertains to a top-down perspective; the political science literature is generally uninterested in how ethnic minorities view the state,1 or the bottom-up perspective. On the other hand, anthropologists who often stay empathetic and close to an ethnic community are typically inattentive to the issues of the state. As a result, both disciplines leave out from their respective research agenda subjects such as how and what ethnicity means to the state and how and what the state means to each ethnic community. In practice, the tasks of identifying, mobilizing, and governing of ethnic communities belong to the state. It is assumed that the state has the knowledge regarding these ethnic practices. Ironically, however, the state rarely develops an effective mechanism to communicate with its ethnic citizens, and is therefore unable to appreciate the responses each ethnic community has to the intervention of the state in its daily life. In short, neither political scientists nor anthropologists have developed any systematic way of looking at the state from the minority points of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For criticism of political science research in this regard, see David Campbell, National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yosef Lapid and Fridrich Kratochwill (eds.), The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1996);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yosef Lapid, “Theorizing the ‘national’ in International Relations Theory,” in International Organizations, (New York: HaperCollins, 1996), 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ralph Litzinger, Other Chinas: The Yao and the Politics of Belonging (Durham: Duke University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pan Nianying, Hand Notes on Helping the Poor [fu pin shou ji] (Shanghai: Shanghai literature and Art Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Chih-yu Shih

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shih, Cy. (2007). Living with the State: Multiplying Ethnic Yao Narratives in Jinxiu. In: Autonomy, Ethnicity, and Poverty in Southwestern China: The State Turned Upside Down. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609341_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics