Abstract
Bertolt Brecht’s encounter with the American political theater in 1935 points us to a profound aesthetic discrepancy at the heart of political theater by revealing the existence of a vital, non-modernist tradition of articulating a leftist cultural critique. Theatre Union’s adaptation of his epic drama The Mother evinces the characteristics that were typical for many New Deal productions and can therefore be considered emblematic of the predominant leftist aesthetics of the time. The visible clash of its vernacular aesthetic with Brecht’s inherent modernist approach in the final production of Mother, moreover, triggered ardent debates among leftist critics over the form and function of political art in the United States—discussions that were to shape other New Deal productions as well. For these reasons, I deem Brecht’s experience with leftist Broadway crucial to understanding the praxis of New Deal theater as a whole as well as the cultural logic of its time. In what follows, I shall examine the aesthetics and politics of Theatre Union’s production of Brecht’s play more closely. Besides playing out the conflict between the two conceptions of political theater, I will also consider what kind of questions this encounter poses for our understanding of political theater as such.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Bertolt Brecht. Brecht on Theatre, ed. and trans. John Willett. New York: Hill & Wang, 1964, 133.
See Fredric Jameson. Brecht and Method. London: Verso, 1998, 39–40.
Fredric Jameson. The Prison House of Language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972, 58.
Bertolt Brecht. Collected Plays, vol. 3/2, ed. and trans. John Willett and Ralph Mannheim. London: Methuen, 1970, 240
and Walter Benjamin. Understanding Brecht, trans. Anna Bostock. London: Verso, 1998, 34.
The transformation of Gorky’s novel into the classic of socialist realism is one of the famous anachronisms of literary history, since the novel predates the proclamation of socialist realism by twenty-eight years. See Thomas Lahusen. “Socialist Realism.” In The Encyclopedia of Literature and Politics, ed. M. Keith Booker. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2005.
Theater board members Albert Maltz and George Sklar, qtd. in Lee Baxandall. “Brecht in America, 1935.” TDR 12:1 (Fall 1967):71 and 75.
Letter to V. J. Jerome, chief cultural officer of CPUSA in Bertolt Brecht. Werke: Grosse kommentierte Berliner und Frankfurter Ausgabe, vol. xxviii, ed. Werner Hecht, Jan Knopf, Werner Mittenzwei, and Klaus-Detelf Müller. Berlin, Weimar, and Frankfurt/M.: Aufbau and Suhrkamp, 1989–2000, 522–523, trans. mine.
See Jane Tompkins. Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction 1790–1860. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985. Ironically, this device later on also became the classic trope of socialist realist literature in the form of the death of the revolutionary.
See Katerina Clark. The Soviet Novel: History as Ritual. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1981.
See their letters published in Brecht, Werke, vol. xxviii, 531 and 535, trans. mine. Brecht and Eisler did, however, like and approve the set design by Mordecai Gorelik, probably because it so closely resembled the original Berlin set: a bare revolving stage, two pianos stage right, and a large screen for the projection of titles and photos upstage. See Baxandall, “Brecht in America, 1935,” 78 and Mordecai Gorelik. New Theatres for Old. London: Denis Dobson, 1947 (1940). For extensive documentation of the conflict between Brecht and Theatre Union, see Baxandall, “Brecht in America, 1935,” 69–87
and James K. Lyon. “Der Briefwechsel zwischen Bertolt Brecht und der New Yorker Theatre Union von 1935.” In Brecht-Jahrbuch 1975, ed. John Fuegi, Reinhold Grimm, and Jost Hermand. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1975, 136–155.
Qtd. in Morgan Himmelstein. “The Pioneers of Bertolt Brecht in America.” Modern Drama 9:2 (1966): 186.
James T. Farrell. “Theatre Chronicle.” Partisan Review 3 (February 1936): 29.
Qtd. in Maria Ley-Piscator. The Piscator Experiment. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1967, 40. Case of Clyde Griffiths, an adaptation of Dreiser’s American Tragedy, was originally written for production by the Piscator Kollektiv at the Lessing Theater in Berlin in April 1931. The American version was written in collaboration with Lena Goldschmidt. It opened on 13 March 1936 at the Ethel Barrymore Theatre in New York, where it ran for nineteen performances only.
Fredric Jameson. “Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture.” Social Text 1 (Winter 1979): 134.
Fredric Jameson. “Reflections in Conclusion.” In Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch, Bertolt Brecht, and Georg Lukács. Aesthetics and Politics. London: Verso, 1999 (1977), 198.
Georg Lukács. “Realism in the Balance” (1938). In Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch, Bertolt Brecht, and Georg Lukács. Aesthetics and Politics. London: Verso, 1999 (1977), 33.
John Howard Lawson. “Technique and Drama.” In American Writers’ Congress 1935, ed. Henry Hart. London: Martin Lawrence, 1936, 128f.
Erika Fischer-Lichte. Die Entdeckung des Zuschauers: Paradigmawechsel auf dem Theater des 20. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen and Basel: Francke, 1997.
Stuart Hall. “Notes on Deconstructing the Popular.” In People’s History of Socialist Theory, ed. Raphael Samuel. London: Routledge, 1981, 233.
Michael Denning. The Cultural Front. London: Verso, 1997, xvi.
Copyright information
© 2007 Ilka Saal
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saal, I. (2007). Brecht on Broadway: Reconsidering Political Theater. In: New Deal Theater. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230608832_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230608832_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53806-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60883-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)