Skip to main content

Methodological Pluralism and the Limits of Naturalism in the Study of Politics

  • Chapter
Theory and Evidence in Comparative Politics and International Relations

Part of the book series: New Visions in Security ((NVS))

Abstract

In presenting their alternatives to King, Keohane, and Verba (KKV), Friedrich Kratochwil, Ted Hopf, and Brian Pollins bring out several variations on the interpretivist and scientific approaches to the study of politics. They consider questions in the theory of knowledge (what constitutes and justifies knowledge claims and valid forms of inference), metaphysics (the nature of truth, causality, and the real world), methodology (especially the appropriate degree of pluralism), and the merits of naturalism, that is, the scientific approach to the study of politics.1 These topics are discussed in the sections that follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bernstein, Steven, Richard Ned Lebow, Janice Stein, and Steven Weber. 2000. “God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World,” European Journal of International Relations 6: 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1975. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism. Third Edition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James. 1993. The New Philosophy of Social Science: Problems of Indeterminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonjour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, Fred. 2002. “Scientific Realism as a Metatheory of International Relations” International Studies Quarterly 46: 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. “The Study of Democratic Peace and Progress in International Relations.” International Studies Review 6: 49–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005. The Power of International Theory: Re-Forging the Link to Foreign Policy-Making through Scientific Enquiryb. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2007. Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: Contending Accounts and Concepts. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick M. 1957. Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, Fred. 1966,1989. The Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, Fred I. 1969. Seeing and Knowing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, Pierre. 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, Roderick. 1998. In Defense of Radical Empiricism: Essays and Lectures. Edited by John Troyer. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesdal, Dagfinn. 1979. “Hermeneutics and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method,” Dialectia 33: 319–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1958. Patterns of Discovery. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, Rom. 1986. Varieties of Scientific Realism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, Martin, and Steve Smith. 1991. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William. 1907/1975. Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham, Richard L. 1992. Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyberg, Henry E., Jr. 1990. Science and Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, Daniel. 1998. Microfoundations, Method, and Causation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, Dierdre N. 1998. The Rhetoric of Economics. Second edition. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1932. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 2, Elements of Logic. Edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl. 1968. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Second edition. New York: Harper Torchbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Williard Van Ormand. 1953. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View. Edited by W.V.O. Quine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, Frank. 1990. “Facts and Propositions,” in Philosophical Papers. Edited by D.H. Mellor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, Deborah. 1991. Economics and the Philosophy of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1918. “On the Notion of Cause,” In Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays, Edited by B. Russell. New York: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, Wilfred S. 1954. “The Myth of the Given: Three Lectures on Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind:” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1, Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psycho-Analysis. Edited by Herbert Feigl and Michael Scriven. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1972. “Givenness and Explanatory Coherence?” Journal of Philosophy 70: 612–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, Melvin and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to Arms. Los Angeles, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1985. Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers, Vol. I. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard. 1979. “Internal and External Reasons,” in Rational Action. Edited by Ross Harrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Peter. 1990. The Idea of a Social Science. Second edition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Richard Ned Lebow and Mark Irving Lichbach

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chernoff, F. (2007). Methodological Pluralism and the Limits of Naturalism in the Study of Politics. In: Lebow, R.N., Lichbach, M.I. (eds) Theory and Evidence in Comparative Politics and International Relations. New Visions in Security. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230607507_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics