Skip to main content

Possession

Metamorphosis Complete

  • Chapter
James Merrill and W.H. Auden

Part of the book series: American Literature Readings in the 21 Century ((ALTC))

  • 50 Accesses

Abstract

Leslie Brisman writes: “Much of Merrill’s great trilogy, especially Scripts, is under the influence of Auden, and I think it is Auden more than anyone else who deflected Merrill from the grand and more Yeatsian enterprise of ‘The Book of Ephraim.’”1 There is no question that the author of A Vision would have made a perfect companion spirit in The Changing Light at Sandover and not a mere “WORDLESS PRESENCE” (CLS, 424), as he is called near the end of the trilogy. Instead, it came to Auden to assist Merrill in his Ouija board undertaking. In Merrill’s poem, Wystan becomes a substitute for the poet himself—his oeuvre, his personality, his ethos as a writer. True affinity between the two poets is established on the pages of the trilogy as Auden’s wisdom perfectly complements Merrill’s wit, while his public commitment harmonizes with the American poet’s personal self-investment. But, as the previous chapter demonstrates, in terms of certain views the posthumous Auden seriously differs from his prototype in the earthly life. Although some of his speeches sound as if they are lifted off a random page of his writings, the “real” Auden would have been surprised at some of the things his ghost says in Merrill’s poem—not only renouncing his Christian faith, but uncharacteristically (if comfortingly for Merrill) associating beauty with truth.

Only those poets can leave us

whom we have never possessed.

—Richard Howard, “Again for Hephaistos, the Last Time”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy of Dante Alighieri: Inferno, trans. Allen Mandelbaum (New York: Bantam Books, 1982), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Longinus, “On the Sublime,” in Critical Theory since Plato, ed. Hazard Adams (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1971), 86.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harold Bloom, The Ringers in the Tower (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), 210. Since in the lines that precede this passage Auden reflects on poetry’s role in society, it is also possible that while working on this part of the “New Year Letter” he was consulting Percy Bysshe Shelley’s Defence of Poetry, in which we find this Longinian passage: “Even in modern times, no living poet ever arrived at the fulness of his fame; the jury which sits in judgment upon a poet, belonging as he does to all time, must be composed of his peers; it must be impaneled by Time from the selectest wise of many generations.” A Defence of Poetry, ed. John E. Jordan (New York: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1965), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W.H. Auden, preface to Nineteenth-Century British Minor Poets, ed. W.H. Auden (New York: Delacorte, 1966), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Auden’s foreword to Adrienne Rich’s Yale-prize winning first book of poetry A Change of World is often criticized for its patronizing tone with respect to the young female poet. But it also sheds light on Auden’s reflections, in the same period, on an individual poet’s relationship with literary tradition. Here Auden seems to assume that it is impossible to be completely “original” with respect to the past—”he who today climbs the Matterhorn, though he be the greatest climber who ever lived, must tread in Whymper’s footsteps.” But as a way of easing the burden he again personalizes the concept of poetic influence, beginning his introduction with an analogy between a poem and a person (we want them handsome and intelligent, not plain and stupid, he says), praising Rich for not concealing her “family tree,” and approvingly noting that her poems “respect their elders but are not cowed by them.” Foreword to A Change of World, by Adrienne Rich, in Adrienne Riches Poetry and Prose, ed. Barbara Charlesworth Gelpi and Albert Gelpi (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1993), 277–79.

    Google Scholar 

  6. James Fenton, “Auden’s Enchantment,” New Tork Review of Books 47, no. 6 (April 13, 2000): 64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Quoted in Mendelson, Early Auden, 67. For more substantial descriptions of the journal, now stored at the Berg Collection of English and American Literature of The New York Public Library, see Humphrey Carpenter, W.H. Auden: A Biography (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981), 97–101; and Bozorth, Auden’s Games of Knowledge, 54–87.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Orlan Fox, “Friday Nights,” in W.H. Auden: A Tribute, ed. Stephen Spender (New York: Macmillan, 1975), 175.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.S. Eliot, The Waste Land: A Facsimile and Transcript of the Original Drafts, ed. Valerie Eliot (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. James Merrill, “ The Changing Light at Sandover: A Conversation with James Merrill,” interview by Robert Polito, Pequod 31 (1990): 11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. John Ashbery, Other Traditions (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000), 70.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Randall Jarrell, The Third Book of Criticism (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1969), 134.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Randall Jarrell, Auden, Kipling & Co.: Essays and Reviews 1935–1964 (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1980), 145.

    Google Scholar 

  14. These comments were made respectively by Thorn Gunn, Philip Larkin, John Updike, and Denis Donoghue. See John Haffenden, W.H. Auden: The Critical Heritage (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983), 423, 419, 429, 482.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Alan Jacobs, What Became of Wystan: Change and Continuity in Auden’s Poetry (Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 1998), 104–10.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nick Halpern, Everyday and Prophetic: The Poetry of Lowell, Ammons, Merrill, and Rich (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2003), 162.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Willard Spiegelman, The Didactic Muse: Scenes of Instruction in Contemporary American Poetry (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989), 244.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Linda Hutcheon, A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms (New York: Methuen, 1985), xii, 96.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Christopher Ricks, Allusion to the Poets (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lucy McDiarmid, Auden’s Apologies for Poetry (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W.H. Auden, “Notebooks of Somerset Maugham,” review of A Writer’s Notebook, by W. Somerset Maugham, New Tork Times Book Review, October 23, 1949, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W.H. Auden, ‘The Map of All My Youth’: Early Works, Friends and Influences, ed. Katherine Bucknell and Nicholas Jenkins (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), 86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Piotr K. Gwiazda

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gwiazda, P.K. (2007). Possession. In: James Merrill and W.H. Auden. American Literature Readings in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230607163_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics