Abstract
Chapter 1 looked at U.S. policy options toward Iraq, North Korea, and China and the rationales for them. Chapter 2 laid out today’s major contending theories of IR and showed that, with a particular set of factual beliefs, those who advocate a particular theory are more likely to support some of the policies in these cases and oppose others. Thus, given the set of factual claims, which option policy makers choose depends on which theory they accept. An answer to the question, which policy is most likely to succeed? hinges on the answer to the question, which theory is best? However, before we can determine which theory is best we must answer the question, how do we determine which is the best theory?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2007 Fred Chernoff
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chernoff, F. (2007). International Relations and Scientific Criteria for Choosing a Theory. In: Theory and Metatheory in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230606883_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230606883_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-7455-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60688-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)