Abstract
The recent presidentialism versus parliamentarism debate generated a large body of literature on the role of institutional factors in advancing stable democracy. In a relatively short period of time since the 1990 publication of Juan Linz’s article The Perils of Presidentialism, which raised the issue of what type of government is more conducive to a successful democratic transition, many political scientists across the globe have devoted their attention to the exploration of the nature of executive-legislative relations in postauthoritarian systems. Some of the arguments made at the dawn of the debate have been later supported with new evidence and advanced to a higher level of sophistication. Other propositions proved to have a short life and have been rebuffed by consequent research on the subject. Still new arguments are being offered in order to be scrutinized, supported, or questioned by other authors. In other words, a normal process of accumulation of knowledge, gathering of facts, crystallization of theories and methods takes place.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2007 Andrey A. Meleshevich
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meleshevich, A.A. (2007). The Type of Government and the Party System. In: Party Systems in Post-Soviet Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603615_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603615_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53514-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60361-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)