Skip to main content

Chaucer’s Man Show: Anachronistic Authority in Brian Helgeland’s a Knight’s Tale

  • Chapter
Race, Class, and Gender in “Medieval” Cinema

Part of the book series: The New Middle Ages ((TNMA))

Abstract

The 2001 movie A Knight’s Tale prompted Peter Travers to invent a new exclamation: “Holy Anachronisms!”1 Yet its gleeful wallow in a medieval past that equally recalls fantasies of the 1970s and the 1370s unthinks historicist fidelities in a fashion that recognizes what Jeffrey Jerome Cohen characterizes as the “temporal interlacement” of the Middle Ages, “the impossibility of choosing alterity or continuity” as a critical model for contemporary scholars.2 By mistaking elements of the past for tactical use in the present, Brian Helgeland’s anachronistic rendering of Chaucer’s corpus challenges notions of authority staked on visible control.3 As I argue, A Knight’s Tale consolidates a version of Chaucerian authority visually calibrated to promote a fiction of identity, here a type of masculinity. Although through the construction of the protagonist William’s knighthood Chaucer’s presence in the film is ultimately diminished, the mobility that accompanies his increasing invisibility finally invests Chaucer with an “underground” appeal that reveals canonical authority’s inherent anachronism.

I got hold of a picture of Chaucer and it turns out he’s an enormously fat, bald, bearded dwarf, so…1 threw out any pretension of doing any research whatsoever and made it up.

—Paul Bettany, “Geoff” Chaucer

To me, what this movie is all about is, “You got Chaucer on my Queen.” “No, wait. You got Queen on my Chaucer.”

—Brian Helgeland

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 110.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jeffrey Jerome Cohen, “Introduction: Midcolonial,” The Postcolonial Middle Ages, ed. Jeffrey Jerome Cohen (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2000), pp. 1–17, at p. 5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Régis Debray, “The Three Ages of Looking,” trans. Eric Rauth, Critical Inquiry 21 (1995): 529–55, at p. 532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seth Lerer, Chaucer and His Readers: Imagining the Author in Late-Medieval England ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993 )

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stephanie Trigg, Congenial Souls: Reading Chaucer from Medieval to Postmodern ( Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002 )

    Google Scholar 

  5. and Kathleen Forni, The Chaucerian Apocrypha: A Counterfeit Canon ( Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2001 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Besides the valuable studies by Lerer, Forni, and Trigg, see also Julia Boffey’s and A. S. G. Edwards’s article, “ ‘Chaucer’s Chronicle,’ John Shirley, and the Canon of Chaucer’s Shorter Poems,” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 20 (1998): 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brian Helgeland, A Knight’s Tale: The Shooting Script (New York: Newmarket Press, 2001), p. 17. Unless there is a difference between the shooting script and the final cut, all further citations refer to the shooting script and are noted parenthetically in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glending Olson, “Making and Poetry in the Age of Chaucer,” Comparative Literature 31 (1979): 272–90 usefully traces the relationship between making and craftsmanship in medieval vernacular literature.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brian Helgeland, “A Write Knight Takes on Hollywood—and Lives to Tell the Tale,” Los Angeles Times, May 14, 2001, www.latimes.com. Also see Helgeland, Shooting Script p. vii.

    Google Scholar 

  10. John Matthews Manly, Some New Light on Chaucer (London, 1926) follows this approach.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Susan Crane, The Performance of Self: Ritual, Clothing, and Identity during the Hundred Years War ( Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002 ), pp. 107–139.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kathleen Forni, “Reinventing Chaucer: Helgeland’s A Knight’s Tale,” Chaucer Review 37 (2003): 252–64, at p. 254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steve Ellis, Chaucer at Large: The Poet in the Modern Imagination ( Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000 ), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  14. John Horn, “The Reviewer Who Wasn’t There; Sony resorts to some questionable marketing practices to promote new movies,” Newsweek, June 2, 2001, www.newsweek.com.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Lynn T. Ramey Tison Pugh

Copyright information

© 2007 Lynn T. Ramey and Tison Pugh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crocker, H.A. (2007). Chaucer’s Man Show: Anachronistic Authority in Brian Helgeland’s a Knight’s Tale. In: Ramey, L.T., Pugh, T. (eds) Race, Class, and Gender in “Medieval” Cinema. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603561_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603561_13

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53486-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60356-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics