Abstract
By the late nineteenth century, the petty warring among Hyderabad’s elites had subsided. As the samasthans had survived by the military support they could provide and the armed forces they controlled,what would now fill the vacuum created by a more peaceful Deccan? The answer to this predicament had already been in play for centuries, but now took on fresh importance. The samasthan families as well as other participants in Hyderabad’s nobility capitalized on ceremony, pomp, and bluster. These ceremonial activities began to absorb the attention and wealth once expended on military adventures.1 This occurred concomitant with the “high noon” of the Raj, which brought its own need for ceremony and imperial display. The ways in which these processes materialized was a form of “ornamentalism” or, “hierarchy made visible.”2 A composite court culture emerged that contained elements of Hindu, Muslim, and European practice. The samasthan families used a variety of strategies to take advantage of this increasingly ceremonial world. Recognizing status, reaffirming rank, exchanging gifts, and other negotiations over power were largely meted out in the durbars held at different levels of power in Hyderabad State, and in British India as well.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
David Cannadine, Ornamentalism: How the British Saw Their Empire ( London: Penguin Group, 2001 ), p. 122.
John Kaye, The Life and Correspondence of Major-General Sir John Malcolm, vol. 2 (London: Smith, Elder, and Co., 1856 ), pp. 98–99.
Rajendra Prasad, The Asif Jahs of Hyderabad ( New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House, 1984 ), p. 173.
Bernard Cohn, “Representing Authority in Victorian India,” in The Invention of Tradition, ed. Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger (Cambridge: Canto, 1983 ), pp. 176–77.
Stewart Gordon, “Introduction: Ibn Battuta and a Region of Robing,” in Robes of Honour Khilât in Pre-Colonial and Colonial India, ed. Stewart Gordon (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003 ), p. 21.
C. Defremery, B.R. Sanguinetti, and H.A.R. Gibb, eds., The Travels of Ibn Batutta, A.D. 1325–1354, vol. 3 ( Cambridge: The University Press, 1971 ), pp. 662–63.
Phillip Lawson, The East India Company: A History ( London: Longman, 1993 ), p. 123.
Copyright information
© 2007 Benjamin B. Cohen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cohen, B.B. (2007). Turbans, Titles, and Tigers: Symbols of Rulership. In: Kingship and Colonialism in India’s Deccan 1850–1948. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603448_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603448_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53510-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60344-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)