Abstract
The use of military force by President George W. Bush against Iraq poses a threat to constitutional government, civil liberties, and national security (both here and abroad). It represents the culmination over the past 50 years of unilateral presidential wars accompanied by few checks from Congress or the judiciary. Academics, the media, and the general public have shown little understanding of constitutional limits and little interest in keeping the president within legal bounds. The current Iraq War reflects the ideological efforts of neoconservatives who have promoted, in recent decades, a far-reaching military agenda to assure American hegemony (the term they prefer) in world affairs. Their detailed plans, kept largely on the shelf, were activated with a rush after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Louis Fisher, Military Tribunals and Presidential Power:American Revolution to the War on Terroris (Lawrence:University Press of Kansas, 2005).
See William Michael Treanor, “Fame, the Founding, and the Power to Declare War,” Cornell Law Revie 82 (1997):695
Benjamin Fletcher Wright, ed., The Federalis (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1961), 101.
Michael R. Beschloss, ed., Taking Charge:The Johnson White House Tapes, 1963–196 (New York:Touchstone, 1998 edn.), 88, 95, 213–14, 370, 380.
H. R. McMaster, Dereliction of Duty:Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Lies That Led to Vietna (New York:HarperPerennial, 1998), 333–4.
Gaillard Hunt, ed., The Writings of James Madiso, vol. 6 (New York:G. P. Putnam’s, 1900–1910), 174.
John C. Fitzpatrick ed., The Writings of George Washingto, vol. 33 (Washington, DC:Government Printing Office, 1931–1944), 73.
Clarence Edwin Carter, ed., The Territorial Papers of the United State, vol. 4 (Washington, DC:National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration, 1972), 389.
James D. Richardson, ed., A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the President, vol. 1 (New York:Bureau of National Literature, 1897–1925), 315.
Edward S. Corwin, “The President’s Power,” New Republi, January 29, 1951, 16.
Weissman v. Metropolitan Life Ins. C., 112 F. Supp. 420, 425 (S.D. Cal. 1953); Gagliomella v. Metropolitan Life Ins. C., 122 F. Supp. 246 (D. Mass. 1954); Carius v. New York Life Insurance C., 124 F. Supp. 388 (D. Ill. 1954); Western Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Meadow, 261 S.W. 2nd 554 (Tex. 1953).
“Military Situation in the Far East” (Part 3), hearings before the Senate Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess. (1951), 2014.
Henry Steele Commager, “Presidential Power:The Issue Analyzed,” New York Time, January 14, 1951, 11.
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., “Presidential Powers:Taft Statement on Troops Opposed, Actions of Past Presidents Cited,” New York Time, January 9, 1951, 28.
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Imperial Presidenc (Boston:Houghton Mifflin Co., 1973), 139.
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. and Alfred de Grazia, Congress and the Presidenc (Washington, DC:American Enterprise Institute, 1967), 27–8.
Richard E. Neustadt, Presidential Powe (New York:Signet Book, 1964 paperback ed.), 23.
Neal Devins and Louis Fisher, “The Steel Seizure Case:One of a Kind?” Constitutional Commentar 19 (2000):67–71.
Richard E. Neustadt, Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents:The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reaga (New York:Free Press, 1990), x. Pages 3–163 reprint, without change, the 1960 edition of Presidential Powe.
For example, Andrew J. Bacevich, American Empir (Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 2002); Anonymous, Imperial Hubris:Why the West Is Losing the War on Terroris (Washington, DC:Brassey’s Inc., 2004); Chalmers Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire:Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republi (New York:Metropolitan Books, 2004); Carl Boggs, Imperial Delusions:American Militarism and Endless Wa (Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield, 2005).
James Mann, Rise of the Vulcans:The History of Bush’s War Cabine (New York:Viking, 2004), 190.
Lawrence F. Kaplan and William Kristol, The War Over Iraq:Saddam’s Tyranny and America’s Missio (San Francisco:Encounter Books, 2003), 112.
George H. Nash, The Conservative Intellectual Movement in Americ (Wilmington, DE:Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 1998), 75–87.
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Vital Center:The Politics of Freedo (New York:De Capo Press, 1988), xxii.
Leo Strauss, Natural Right and Histor (Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1953).
Leo Strauss, “An Epilogue,” in Herbert J. Storing, ed., Essays on the Scientific Study of Politic (New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1962), 307.
Herbert J. Storing, “The Achievement of Leo Strauss,” National Revie, December 7, 1973, 1348–9.
Shadia B. Drury, Leo Strauss and the American Righ (New York:St. Martin’s Press, 1999), 2–17.
Ibid., 97–136. For a collection of essays by Straussians, see Kenneth L. Deutsch and John A. Murley, eds., Leo Strauss, the Straussians, and the American Regim (Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield, 1999).
Anne Norton, Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empir (New Haven:Yale University Press, 2004), 6–18; John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge, The Right Nation:Conservative Power in Americ (New York:Penguin Press, 2004), 200–7; Mann, Rise of the Vulcan, 22–9; Elizabeth Drew, “The Neocons in Power,” New York Review of Book, June 12, 2003, 20–2.
Bernard Susser, “Leo Strauss:the Ancient as Modern,” Political Studie 36 (1988):499.
Leo Strauss, Thoughts on Machiavell (Glencoe, IL:Free Press, 1958), 9, 12, 13. He calls Machiavelli “an evil man,” “immoral and irreligious,” “diabolical,” and “a devil.”
Hwa Yol Jung, “Leo Strauss’s Conception of Political Philosophy:A Critique,” Review of Politic 29 (1967):492.
John Ehrman, The Rise of Neoconservatism:Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs, 1945–199 (New Haven:Yale University Press, 1995), 190.
Gary Dorrien, The Neoconservative Mind:Politics, Culture, and the War of Ideolog (Philadelphia:Temple University Press, 1993), ix.
Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Min (New York:Simon & Schuster, 1987), 67. See also pages 25ff, 34, and 141ff.
See two recent books by Tariq Ali:The Clash of Fundamentalisms:Crusades, Jihads and Modernit (London:Verso, 2003), and Bush in Babylon:The Recolonisation of Ira (London:Verso, 2003).
Joshua Muravchik, Exporting Democracy:Fulfilling America’s Destin (Washington, DC:AEI Press, 1992 ed.).
Norman Podhoretz, “Making the World Safe for Communism,” Commentar, April 1976, 35.
L. Gordon Crovitz, “How Ronald Reagan Weakened the Presidency,” Commentar, September 1988, 25.
See L. Gordon Crovitz and Jeremy A. Rabkin, eds., The Fettered Presidency:Legal Constraints on the Executive Branc (Washington, DC:American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1989); Terry Eastland, Energy in the Executive:The Case for the Strong Presidenc (New York:Free Press, 1992).
“The American Congress,” The Public Interes 100, Summer 1990; Gordon S. Jones and John A. Marini, eds., The Imperial Congres (New York:Pharos Books, 1988).
Joseph M. Bessette, The Mild Voice of Reason:Deliberative Democracy and American National Governmen (Chicago:University Press of Chicago, 1994).
Friedrich A. von Hayek, The Road to Serfdo (Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press, 1994), 69–79.
Friedrich. A. von Hayek, “Why I Am Not a Conservative,” in Frank S. Meyer, ed., What Is Conservatism (New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964), 88–103. For conservatives who wrote positively about Congress, see James Burnham, Congress and the American Traditio (Chicago:Henry Regnery Co., 1959) and Alfred de Grazia, ed., Congress:The First Branch of Governmen (Garden City, NY:Anchor Books, 1967).
Willmoore Kendall, “The Two Majorities,” Midwest Journal of Political Scienc 4 (1960):317–45, The Conservative Affirmatio (Chicago:Henry Regnery Co., 1963), 21–49.
Irving Kristol, Neoconservatism:The Autobiography of an Ide (Chicago:Elephant Paperbacks, 1999), 365.
Irving Kristol, “The Future of American Jewry,” Commentar, August 1991, 24–5.
Irving Kristol, Reflections of a Neoconservativ (New York:Basic Books, 1983), xiii.
Michael A. Ledeen, “A Republican Contract with the World,” Weekly Standar, May 13, 1996, 25; see Julie Kosterlitz, “The Neoconservative Moment,” National Journa, May 17, 2003, 1542.
James Nuechterlein, “Neoconservatism & Irving Kristol,” Commentar, August 1984, 45.
William Kristol and Robert Kagan, “Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy,” Foreign Affair 75 (1996):18, 19.
“A Clean Break:A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” June 1996 report for the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, Jerusalem; <www. israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm.>. Accessed October 1, 2004; Micklethwait and Wooldridge, The Right Natio, 204.
Micklethwait and Wooldridge, The Right Natio, 215. For a thoughtful and informed analysis of the belief that Jewish neocons provoked the Iraq War to help Israel, see Joshua Muravchik, “The Neoconservative Cabal,” Commentar, September 2003, 26–33.
Gershom Goremberg, The End of Days:Fundamentalism and the Struggle for the Temple Moun (New York:Oxford University Press, 2002 edn.), 5–6.
David Wurmser, Tyranny’s Ally:America’s Failure to Defeat Saddam Hussei (Washington, DC:AEI Press, 1999), 116.
Robert Kagan and William Kristol, eds., Present Dangers:Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Polic (San Francisco:Encounter Books, 2000), 6.
Project for the New American Century, “Rebuilding America’s Defense:Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century” (September 2000), ii.
The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, introductory remarks by President Bush (September 2002), 1.
Mark Lilla, “The Closing of the Straussian Mind,” New York Review of Book, November 4, 2004, 58.
Carnes Lord, The Modern Prince:What Leaders Need to Know No (New Haven:Yale University Press, 2003), 5.
Kaplan and Kristol, The War Over Ira, 98.
Francis Fukuyama, “The Neoconservative Moment,” The National Interes, Summer 2004, 60. For Krauthammer’s rebuttal, see “In Defense of Democratic Realism,” The National Interes (Fall 2004), 15–25.
Francis Fukuyama, State-Building:Governance and World Order in the 21st Centur (Ithaca:Cornell University Press, 2004), 38–9.
Richard Lowry, “What Went Wrong?” National Revie, October 25, 2004, 42.
Eliot A. Cohen, Supreme Command:Soldiers, Statesmen, and Leadership in Wartim (New York:Free Press, 2002).
John P. Burke and Fred I. Greenstein, How Presidents Test Reality:Decisions on Vietnam, 1954 and 196 (New York:Russell Sage Foundation, 1989).
Larry Bossidy and Ram Charan, Execution:The Discipline of Getting Things Don (New York:Crown Business, 2002), 22, 67.
Michael R. Gordon, “The Strategy to Secure Iraq Did Not Foresee a 2nd War,” New York Time, October 19, 2004, A10.
James Fallows, “Blind Into Baghdad,” The Atlantic Monthl, January/February 2004, 58.
Ibid., 60. See also Thomas E. Ricks, “Army Historian Cites Lack of Postwar Plan,” Washington Pos, December 25, 2004, A1.
Walter Pincus and Dana Priest, “Bush Orders the CIA to Hire More Spies,” Washington Pos, November 24, 2004, A4.
David Wise, The Politics of Lying:Government Deception, Secrecy, and Power (New York:Random House, 1973, 346.
Louis Fisher, American Constitutional La, 6th ed. (Durham:Carolina Academic Press, 2005), 75–114, 288–9, 296–301.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Michael A. Genovese and Lori Cox Han
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fisher, L. (2006). From Presidential Wars to American Hegemony:The Constitution After 9/11. In: Genovese, M.A., Han, L.C. (eds) The Presidency and the Challenge of Democracy. The Evolving American Presidency Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230600744_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230600744_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-7423-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60074-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)