Advertisement

The ‘Terrorist Feminist’: Strategies of Gate-Keeping in the Hungarian Printed Media

  • Erzsébet Barát

Abstract

In the following chapter I hope to think through and problematize the first eleven years of democratization in Hungary from a feminist perspective. My decision is motivated by the assumption that the changes in the Hungarian political system over the 1990s to a relatively more democratic political structure should at long last also mean some space in the Hungarian political (and academic) printed media for the articulation and circulation of a critique of the effects of bourgeois patriarchy as well. In other words, after the absence of reference to feminism between 1945 and 1989 in the various public domains of the printed media, one would have hoped that a more open society should involve some space in the printed media for feminist voices articulating what social and cultural changes they consider relevant in the post-state socialist era, including the contestation over the meaning of the term ‘feminism’ itself.

Keywords

Mainstream Medium Critical Discourse Analysis Feminist Discourse Linguistic Device Feminist Woman 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamik, M. (2001) ‘Az Allamszocializmus es a nókérdés’ (‘State Socialism and the Woman Question’), unpublished PhD thesis, Budapest: ELTE University.Google Scholar
  2. Barát, E. (2000a) ‘A relational model of identity: discoursal negotiations of (non)oppressive relations of power in (researching) Hungarian women’s life narratives’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
  3. Barát, E. (2000b) ‘Are you an alien?’ Discourses of discrimination in the Hungarian political discourse’, in M. Reisigl and R. Wodak (eds), The Semiotics of Racism: Approaches in Critical Discourse Analysis. Vienna: Passagen Verlag, pp. 237–65.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, D. (1995) ‘Rethinking language and gender studies: some issues for the 1990s’, in S. Mills (ed.), Language and Gender: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London and New York: Longman, pp. 31–44.Google Scholar
  5. Delphy, C. and Leonard, D. (1992) Familiar Exploitations: A New Analysis of Marriage in Contemporary Western Societies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Fraser, N. (1997) ‘From redistribution to recognition?’, in N. Fraser, Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the Postsocialist Condition. New York: Routledge, pp. 11–39.Google Scholar
  7. Hennessy, R. (1993) Materialist Feminism: The Politics of Discourse. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Hennessy, R. (2000) Profit and Pleasure: Sexual Identities in Late Capitalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Linde, C. (1993) Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Poszler, Gy. (1986) Az Evszázad csapdai. (The Traps of the Century). Budapest: Magvetó.Google Scholar
  11. Poszler, Gy. (1998) Duna-volgyi realfantasztikum (Real-phantasy in the Danube Valley). Budapest: Liget.Google Scholar
  12. Spivak, G. C. (1996) ‘Subaltern talk: interview with the editors’, in D. Landry and G. Maclean (eds), The Spivak Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 287–308.Google Scholar
  13. Probyn, E. (1997) ‘New traditionalism and post-feminism: TV does the home’, in C. Brunsdon etal. (eds), Feminist Television Criticism: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 126–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erzsébet Barát

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations