Advertisement

Performing State Fatherhood: The Remaking of Hegemony

  • Michelle M. Lazar

Abstract

This chapter1 is concerned with the politics at work in representations of the modern father. Particularly in contemporary industrialized societies, where women have made considerable strides in the public work arena, there has been a growing visibility and accentuation of men’s domestic identity as fathers, giving rise to a ‘culture of daddyhood’. Adapting the term from LaRossa (1997),2 I mean by this the general popularization of the paternal identity. It is not unusual these days to see fathers spending time with their children; pushing strollers in parks, and playing with them. This is particularly pronounced in the media as a common representation of modern masculinity, and is fast becoming a global trend. Governments and political leaders around the globe are not exempt from participation in the promulgation of the daddyhood culture either. In recent years, Britain’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair, cradling his newborn, was photographed performing fatherhood, which made it to the front pages of all the British newspapers in May 2000. On separate occasions, Singapore’s former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong also publicly performed fatherhood when he shared, in his 2002 National Day televised address to the nation, and again in a speech on the eve of the 2004 Lunar New Year, his own joyful experiences as a father.

Keywords

Family Life Gender Relation Hegemonic Masculinity Critical Discourse Analysis Domestic Sphere 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burgoyne, Jacqueline (1987) ‘Change, gender, and the life course’, in Gayror. Cohen (ed.), Social Change and the Life Course. London: Tavistock, pp. 33–66.Google Scholar
  2. Busfield, Joan (1987) ‘Parenting and parenthood’, in Gaynor Cohen (ed.), Social Change and the Life Course. London: Tavistock, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, Judith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Canaan, Joyce E. and Griffin, Christine (1990) ‘The new men’s studies: part of the problem or part of the solution?’, in Jeff Hearn and David Morgan (eds), Men, Masculinities and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 206–14.Google Scholar
  5. Chapman, Rowena (1988) ‘The great pretender: variations of the new man theme’, in Rowena Chapman and Jonathan Rutherford (eds), Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity. London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 225–48.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, Robert W. (1995) Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ehrenreich, Barbara (1984) ‘A feminist’s view of the new man’, The New York Times, 20 May, 36.Google Scholar
  8. Fairclough, Norman (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, Michel (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  10. Goffman, Erving (1979) Gender Advertisements. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Gramsci, Antonio (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  12. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  13. Hammerton, A. J. (1996) ‘A comment from A. J. Hammerton to R. W. Connell’s “Politics of Changing Men“’, Australian Humanities Review, 4.Google Scholar
  14. Kraemer, Sebastian (1994) ‘What are fathers for?’, in Charlotte Burck and Bebe Speed (eds), Gender, Power and Relationships. London: Routledge, pp. 202–17.Google Scholar
  15. Kress, Gunther and van Leeuwen, Theo (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. LaRossa, Ralph (1997) The Modernization of Fatherhood: A Social and Political History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lazar, Michelle M. (1993) ‘Equalizing gender relations: a case of double-talk’, Discourse & Society, 4 (4): 443–65.Google Scholar
  18. Lazar, Michelle M. (1999) ‘Family life advertisements and the narrative of heterosexual sociality’, in Phyllis G. L. Chew and Anneliese Kramer-Dahl (eds), Reading Culture: Textual Practices in Singapore. Singapore: Times Academic Press, pp. 145–62.Google Scholar
  19. Lazar, Michelle M. (2000) ‘Gender, discourse and semiotics: the politics of parenthood representations’, Discourse & Society, 11 (3): 373–400.Google Scholar
  20. Lazar, Michelle M. (2001) ‘For the good of the nation: “strategic egalitarianism” in the Singapore context’, Nations and Nationalism, 7 (1): 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lazar, Michelle M. (2002) ‘Consuming personal relationships: the achievement of feminine self-identity through other-centredness’, in Lia Litosseliti and Jane Sunderland (eds), Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lorber, Judith (1994) The Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lupton, Deborah and Barclay, Lesley (1997) Constructing Fatherhood: Discourses and Experiences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Nicolson, Paula (1993) ‘Motherhood and women’s lives’, in Diane Richardson and Victoria Robinson (eds), Introducing Women’s Studies. London: Macmillan, pp. 201–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Phoenix, Ann and Woollett, Anne (1991) ‘Introduction’, in Ann Phoenix, Anne Woollett and Eva Lloyd (eds), Motherhood: Meanings, Practices and Ideologies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Rich, Adrienne (1980) ‘Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence’, Signs 5 (4): 631–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rutherford, Jonathan (1988) ‘Who’s that man?’, in Rowena Chapman and Jonathan Rutherford (eds), Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity. London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 21–67.Google Scholar
  28. Segal, Lynne (1990) Slow Motion: Changing Masculinities, Changing Men. London: Virago.Google Scholar
  29. Van Leeuwen, Theo (1993) ‘Genre and field in critical discourse analysis’, Discourse & Society, 4 (2): 193–223.Google Scholar
  30. Woollett, Anne and Phoenix, Ann (1991) ‘Psychological view of mothering’, in Ann Phoenix, Anne Woollett and Eva Lloyd (eds), Motherhood: Meanings, Practices and Ideologies. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Michelle M. Lazar 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle M. Lazar

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations