Abstract
As women increasingly crash though the glass ceiling and reach the highest levels in politics, government institutions and corporate organizations, it is important to critically examine claims that gender is no longer an issue in the workplace. In New Zealand, in the year 2001, for example, women occupied the positions of Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition (until October), Governor General and Chief Justice, as well as Chief Executive Officer positions in influential government ministries and corporate organizations such as Telecom and Mobil. Is this evidence that gender has finally become irrelevant to women’s progress up the professional ladder? Has gender finally retreated into the background as a factor in workplace discourse? This chapter uses CDA to explore the interaction of gender and power in the workplace, and argues that, despite the apparent increase in the number of women in authoritative positions, there is little evidence that gender has become a superfluous consideration in analysing workplace interaction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aries, Elizabeth (1996) Men and Women in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert (1960) ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’, in T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253–76.
Cameron, Deborah (1994) ‘Problems of sexist and non-sexist language’, in Jane Sunderland (ed.), Exploring Gender: Questions for English Language Education. London: Prentice Hall, pp. 26–33.
Coates, Jennifer (1996) Women 1alk. Oxtord: Basil Blackwell.
Dahl, Robert A. (1957) ‘The concept of power’, Behavioral Science, 2: 201–18.
Davis, Kathy (1988) Power under the Microscope. Dordrecht: Foris Holland.
Edley, N. and Wetherell, M. (1997) ‘Jockeying for position: the construction of masculine identities’, Discourse & Society, 8 (2): 203–17.
Fairclough, Norman (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fletcher, Joyce K. (1999) Disappearing Acts. Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
French, J. R. P. and Raven, B. (1959) ‘The bases of social power’, in D. Cartwright, Studies in Social Power. Michigan: University of Michigan.
Galbraith, J. K. (1983) The Anatomy of Power. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Holmes, Janet (1992) Introduciton to Soctoltngutsttcs. New York: Morrow.
Holmes, Janet (1995) Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
Holmes, Janet (2000) ‘Women at work: analysing women’s talk in New Zealand workplaces’, Australian Association of Applied Linguistics, 22 (2): 1–17.
Holmes, Janet (forthcoming) ‘Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humour and gender in the workplace’, to appear in Journal of Pragmatics.
Holmes, Janet and Marra, Meredith (2002a) ‘Having a laugh at work: how humour contributes to workplace culture’, Journal of Pragmatics, 34: 1683–1710.
Holmes, Janet and Marra, Meredith (2002b) ‘Humour as a discursive boundary marker in social interaction’, in Anna Duszak (ed.), Us and Others. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 377–400.
Holmes, Janet and Stubbe, Maria (2003a) Power and Politeness in the Workplace. London: Pearson.
Holmes, Janet and Stubbe, Maria (2003b) “‘Feminine” workplaces: stereotype and reality’ in Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff (eds), Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 573–599.
Holmes, Janet, Burns, Louise, Marra, Meredith, Stubbe, Maria and Vine, Bernadette (2003) ‘Women managing discourse in the workplace’, Women in Management Review, 18(8): 414–24.
Holmes, Janet, Marra, Meredith and Burns, Louise (2001) ‘Women’s humour in the workplace: a quantitative analysis’, Australian Journal of Communication, 28 (1): 83–108.
Holmes, Janet, Stubbe, Maria and Vine, Bernadette (1999) ‘Constructing professional identity: “doing power” in policy units’, in Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts (eds), Discourse in the Workplace: Communication in Institutional and Professional Settings. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 351–85.
Hopper, Robert and LeBaron, Curtis (1998) ‘How gender creeps into talk’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31 (1): 59–74.
Kitzinger, Celia (2000) ‘Doing feminist conversation analysis’, Feminism and Psychology, 10 (2): 163–93.
Kress, Gunther (1990) ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11: 84–99.
Marra, Meredith (2003). ‘Decisions in New Zealand business meetings’, unpublished PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
Marra, Meredith and Holmes, Janet (2004) ‘Workplace narratives and business reports: issues of definition’, Text, 24 (1): 59–78.
Sinclair, John M. and Malcolm Coulthard, R. (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse. London: Oxford University Press.
Sollitt-Morris, Lynette (1996) ‘Language, gender and power relationships: the enactment of repressive discourse in staff meeting as of two subject departments in a New Zealand secondary school’, unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
Stokoe, Elizabeth (1997) ‘An evaluation of two studies of gender and language in educational contexts: some problems in analysis’, Gender and Education, 9 (2): 233–44.
Stokoe, Elizabeth (1998) ‘Talking about gender: the conversational construction of gender categories in academic discourse’, Discourse & Society, 9 (2): 217–40.
Stokoe, Elizabeth (2000) ‘Toward a conversation analytic approach to gender and discourse’, Feminism and Psychology, 10 (4): 552–63.
Stokoe, Elizabeth H. and Smithson, Janet (2001) ‘Making gender relevant: conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction’, Discourse & Society, 12 (2): 217–44.
Stubbe, Maria, Lane, Chris, Hilder, Jo, Vine, Elaine, Vine, Bernadette, Holmes, Janet, Marra, Meredith and Weatherall, Ann (2000) ‘Multiple discourse analyses of a workplace interaction’, Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics, 11: 39–85.
Tannen, Deborah (1987) ‘Remarks on discourse and power’, in Leah Kedar (ed.), Power through Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 3–10.
Tannen, Deborah (1994b) From Nine to Five. New York: Morrow.
Tannen, Deborah (1994a) ‘The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance’, Gender and Discourse. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–52.
van Dijk, Teun A. (1999) ‘Editorial: critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis’, Discourse & Society, 10 (4): 459–60.
Vine, Bernadette (2001) ‘Workplace language and power: directives, requests and advice’, unpublished PhD thesis. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
Weatherall, Ann (2000) ‘Gender relevance in talk-in-interaction and discourse’, Discourse & Society, 11 (2): 286–8.
Wodak, Ruth (1996) Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.
Wodak, Ruth (1999) ‘Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32 (1–2): 185–93.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holmes, J. (2005). Power and Discourse at Work: Is Gender Relevant?. In: Lazar, M.M. (eds) Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-1486-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59990-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)