Abstract
In this chapter we ‘test’ the model developed above regarding legitimacy, and how it differs between the USA and the EU. In the EU case, a UN mandate as an expression of international legitimacy is of major importance, reflecting both the validity of international law as well as the constitutive order of institutional multilateralism. In the US case, legitimacy is rooted primarily in domestic politics — in the concept of national security interests as well as in the concept of ethics, of the values served by using force. How do these different conceptions of legitimacy fit with the cases of Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq?
This is a just war, based not on any territorial ambitions but on values
Blair, 1999, cited in Clark 2001
In a very stark fashion, the handling of the Kosovo situation posed the issue of which consensus was to be the decisive one.
Clark 2001: 199
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Janne Haaland Matlary
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matlary, J.H. (2006). Differing Legitimacy. In: Values and Weapons. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599734_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599734_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54121-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59973-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)