Mansfield Park: ‘she does not like to act’

  • Ashley Tauchert
Part of the Language, Discourse, Society book series (LDS)


It has already been noted by Michael Giffin that Austen works within a paradigm of orthodox Georgian Anglican ideology, representing ‘soteria’ in a way that situates her characters and their problems in relation to the possibility of salvation in a fallen world.332 I would extend that argument to claim that Austen’s narratives mediate between the apparently incommensurable domains of material and ideational worlds, refigured in the more abstract structuring principles of romance finally overcoming the resistance of realism, and figuring in turn the salvational logic of feminine wish-fulfilment; incrementally mediating the fallen with the paradisal. Some literary heroine. And the ‘persistence’ of Austen in the twenty first century suggests that there remains a desire for just such a ‘transformation of the reader’s subjective attitudes’.333 Austen writes explicitly of the possibility of salvation in concrete terms of particular, still recognizable, incarnations of feminine desires and the conditions for overcoming their obstacles. Since the abstractions of desire that she captures transfer across starkly different historical and cultural conditions, her work remains a vehicle for this abstract salvational equation which shapes the narrative form.


Happy Ending Providential Identity Passive Agency Heterosexual Marriage Birth Family 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 330.
    Denise de Rougemont, Love in the Western World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983), pp. 164–5.Google Scholar
  2. 332.
    Michael Giffin, Jane Austen and Religion: Salvation and Society in Georgian England (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2002). Also, see Gary Kelly, ‘Religion and Politics’, in Edward Copeland and Juliet McMaster (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Jane Austen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 335.
    Carol Shields, Jane Austen (London: Phoenix, 2001), pp. 98–9.Google Scholar
  4. 337.
    Jane Austen, Lady Susan/The Watsons/Sanditon (ed.) Margaret Drabble (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974), p. 103.Google Scholar
  5. 340.
    Kingsley Amis, What Became of Jane Austen? And Other Questions (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970), p. 16.Google Scholar
  6. 389.
    Lévi-Strauss, Myth and Meaning (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978), pp. 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ashley Tauchert 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashley Tauchert
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ExeterUK

Personalised recommendations