Northanger Abbey: ‘hastening together to perfect felicity’

  • Ashley Tauchert
Part of the Language, Discourse, Society book series (LDS)

Abstract

Laura Mooneyham White makes a strong claim that the ‘persistence’ of the marriage plot, particularly ‘in popular culture’ and in the context of ‘our culture’s well-founded suspicions of marriage’, is ‘very odd indeed’. She nudges us to consider the marriage that resolves Austen’s novels less as ‘particular historical and social practice’ and more as an imaginary encounter with one of the ‘elementals of human experience’.107 White notes, however, that there is an unresolved problem with thinking of marriage as central to narrative completion: ‘How could one suggest that the movement to heterosexual pairing is the central narrative experience when heterosexual pairing is so clearly not a part of so many people’s lives?’108 This is only the case when we forget the necessary conditions of our own birth. Heterosexual pairing remains fundamental to human existence, however difficult it has become to reconcile the social conventions of marriage. But since it is difficult to say anything directly about the ‘elementals’ of human experience without universalising one’s own experience, it is probably best to approach them indirectly, and Austen’s Northanger Abbey is a good place to start.

Keywords

Manifold Dition Nite Stake Heroine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 104.
    Raymond Williams, The Long Revolution (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980), p. 69.Google Scholar
  2. 105.
    Jameson, Marxism and Form: Twentieth-Century Dialectical Theories of Literature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971), p. 50.Google Scholar
  3. 106.
    Margaret Homans, Bearing the Word: Language and Female Experience in Nineteenth-Century Women’s Writing (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), p. 15.Google Scholar
  4. 114.
    Roman Jakobson, ‘On Realism in Art’ [1921] (trans.) Karol Magassy, in Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views (ed.) Ladislav Matejka and Krystyna Pomorska (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1971), pp. 38–46.Google Scholar
  5. 115.
    J.A. Cuddon, Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory, 4th edition, revised by C.E. Preston (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1998), p. 327.Google Scholar
  6. 122.
    Deborah Ross, The Excellence of Falsehood: Romance, Realism, and Women’s Contribution to the Novel (Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky, 1991), p. 206.Google Scholar
  7. 148.
    Roland Barthes, ‘structural Analysis of Narratives’, in Barthes: Selected Writings (ed.) Susan Sontag (Oxford: Fantana, 1983), p. 253, n2.Google Scholar
  8. 149.
    Hayden White, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990), p. 36.Google Scholar
  9. 151.
    Roy Porter, Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2001) pp. 308–9.Google Scholar
  10. 164.
    Blanford Parker, The Triumph of Augustan Poetics: English Literary Culture from Butler to Johnson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 89, 125.Google Scholar
  11. 166.
    Austen, Love and Friendship: Deceived in Friendship and Betrayed in Love, foreword by Fay Weldon (London: Hasperus Press Ltd, 2003), p. 32.Google Scholar
  12. 173.
    Raymond Williams, The Long Revolution (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980), p. 64.Google Scholar
  13. 176.
    Jacob Torfing, New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mou ffe and Zizek (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 18, 19.Google Scholar
  14. 177.
    Slavoj Žižek, ‘The Spectre of Ideology’, in The Zizek Reader (ed.) Elizabeth Wright and Edmund Wright (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), p. 74.Google Scholar
  15. 179.
    Roland Barthes, ‘structural Analysis of Narrative’, in Barthes: Selected Writings (Oxford: Fontana Paperbacks, 1983), p. 278.Google Scholar
  16. 185.
    Claude Lévi-Strauss, L’Origine des manieres de table (Paris, 1968); quoted by Hayden White, The Content of the Form: Narrative, Discourse and HistoricalRepresentation (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), p. 34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ashley Tauchert 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashley Tauchert
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ExeterUK

Personalised recommendations