Advertisement

Introduction: The Persistence of Jane Austen’s Romance

  • Ashley Tauchert
Part of the Language, Discourse, Society book series (LDS)

Abstract

If the English eighteenth century is understood as a period of social and material reform on an unprecedented scale, characterised by discourses of individual ‘rights’ and ‘egalitarianism’, of ‘rationality’ and ‘liberty’, wrought through struggles between traditionally oppressive social structures and emergent forms of individual consciousness, then Jane Austen seems a rather arbitrary literary expression of English enlightenment. To receive her six famous novels from this perspective, we would expect to find tropes that herald the great political, social, material, philosophical and economic changes taking place in her lifetime, and the lifetime of her narratives; echoes or displaced imprints of the calls for — or resistances to — freedom from accrued tradition, and increased demand for liberty of thought. One of the most overwhelming facts about these six novels, however, remains their overt indifference at the level of content in the great social, economic, political or material events forming their immediate context. This has always been an interesting absence, given the author’s credentials as an intelligent and literate woman. The absence becomes more visible when we remember the naval brothers who had seen action against the French, chased real pirates, carried bullion for the East India Company, and just missed the Battle of Trafalgar; or the cousin married to a French aristocrat guillotined in 1794.24

Keywords

East India Company Happy Ending Feminist Epistemology Free Indirect Discourse Narrative Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 22.
    Slavoj Zizek, ‘There is no Sexual Relationship’, in Elizabeth Wright and Edmond Wright (eds), The Zizek Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 194–5.Google Scholar
  2. 23.
    Jane Austen, Persuasion (ed.) Linda Bree (Ontario: Broadview, 2000), p. 69.Google Scholar
  3. 25.
    Norma Clarke, The Rise and Fall of the Woman of Letters (London: Pimlico, 2004), p. 343.Google Scholar
  4. 26.
    Austen, Pride and Prejudice (ed.) Robert P. Irvine (Ontario: Broadview, 2002), p. 384.Google Scholar
  5. 27.
    Austen, Pride and Prejudice (ed.) Tony Tanner (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972), p. 399, n4.Google Scholar
  6. 29.
    John Skinner, An Introduction to Eighteenth-century Fiction: Raising the Novel (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001), p. 238.Google Scholar
  7. 30.
    Andrew Sanders, The Short Oxford History of English Literature (2nd edition) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 370.Google Scholar
  8. 32.
    Edward Said, Culture and Imperialism (London: Chatto and Windus, 1993).Google Scholar
  9. 33.
    Marilyn Butler, Jane Austen and the War of Ideas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975);Google Scholar
  10. Margaret Kirkham, Jane Austen: Feminism and Fiction (Sussex: Harvester Press, 1986);Google Scholar
  11. Isobel Armstrong, ‘ “Conservative” Jane Austen?-Some Views’, in Isobel Armstrong (ed.), Mansfield Park, Penguin Critical Studies (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1988), pp. 94–104;Google Scholar
  12. Claudia Johnson, Jane Austen: Women, Politics and the Novel (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  13. 36.
    Antoinette Burton, ‘ “Invention is What Delights Me”: Jane Austen’s Remaking of “English” History’, in Devoney Looser (ed.), Jane Austen and Discourses of Feminism (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995), p. 35.Google Scholar
  14. 41.
    Judith Lowder Newton, ‘Power and the ideology of “Woman’s Sphere”’, in Robyn R. Warhol and Diane Price Herndl (eds), Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Criticism and Theory (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1991), pp. 769–10.Google Scholar
  15. 43.
    Gregory L. Lucente, The Narrative of Realism and Myth: Verga, Lawrence, Faulkner, Pavese (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981), p. 45. According to Lucente, ‘realism’s irony protects the validity of the pursuit of knowledge by building essential uncertainty into its program from the beginning’ (p. 46).Google Scholar
  16. 44.
    Anthony Easthope, Englishness and National Culture (London: Routledge, 1999), p. 69.Google Scholar
  17. 46.
    Robert Miles, Jane Austen (Tavistock: Northcote House, 2003), p. 28.Google Scholar
  18. 51.
    Michael McKeon, The Origins of the English Novel 1600–1740 (London: Radius, 1988), pp. 45–6.Google Scholar
  19. 52.
    Ian Watt, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding[1957] (London: Hogarth Press, 1987), p. 12.Google Scholar
  20. 53.
    Pam Morris, Realism (London and New York: Routledge, 2003), p. 77.Google Scholar
  21. 65.
    Patricia Meyer Spacks, ‘Energies of Mind: Plot’s Possibilities in the 1790s’, Eighteenth-century Fiction, 1, 1 (October 1998), p. 2.Google Scholar
  22. 66.
    Northrop Frye, ‘The Archetypes of Literature’, in David Lodge (ed.), Twentieth-century Literary Criticism: A Reader, (London and New York: Longman, 1985), p. 431.Google Scholar
  23. 71.
    Janice Radway, ‘The Institutional Matrix of Romance’, in Simon During (ed.), The Cultural Studies Reader (London and New York: Routledge, 1994), pp. 447–8.Google Scholar
  24. 76.
    Terry Eagleton, ‘Towards a Science of the Text’ [1976], in Terry Eagleton and Drew Milne (eds), Marxist Literary Theory: A Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 302–3.Google Scholar
  25. 79.
    D.W. Harding, ‘Regulated Hatred: an Aspect of the Work of Jane Austen’ [1940], in David Lodge (ed.), Twentieth-century Literary Criticism: A Reader (London and New York: Longman, 1972), p. 263.Google Scholar
  26. 84.
    Julia Kristeva, Powers of Horror: An Essay in Abjection (trans.) Leon S. Roudiez (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982), p. 1.Google Scholar
  27. 87.
    Northop Frye, The Secular Scripture (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976), pp. 28–31.Google Scholar
  28. 94.
    Mary Poovey, The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecra ft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984), p. 229. Quoted by Woloch, p. 96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ashley Tauchert 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashley Tauchert
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ExeterUK

Personalised recommendations