Abstract
The objective of this paper is to show how social construction operates as a mode of self-regulation for businesses that voluntarily seek to become corporate citizens. Modes of regulation are of much contemporary interest. As the economic context is changing, new ways of regulating business behaviour are emerging. There is much debate, and little consensus, on appropriate business behaviour and acceptable modes of regulation. Regulation tends to be associated with one of two approaches: positive reinforcement of desirable behaviour, or negative reinforcement of undesirable behaviour. The former uses incentives (i.e., a carrot) to reward businesses for good behaviour. The incentives are often financial rewards (e.g., profit) that are seen as the direct or indirect result of good business behaviour. The aim is to encourage good behaviour. Negative reinforcement of undesirable behaviour comes as a punishment (i.e., a stick) for bad behaviour and takes the form of sanctions that are imposed on actors to prevent them from behaving in undesirable ways. For instance, legal sanctions can make it highly undesirable for businesses to act in certain ways. The objective here is to prevent bad behaviour.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Commission of the European Communities (July 18, 2001). Green paper. Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: Available: Europa. eu.int/comm/employment_social/soc-dial/csr/csr_index.htm.
Danish Parliament (April 17, 2001). L 149. Forslag til lov om sociale klausuler på offentlige tilskudsområder [Proposal for law about social obligations in areas of public financing]. Folketingets samling 2000–2001 [Parliamentary collection 2000–2001]. Available: www.folketinget.dk.
Danish Parliament, European Committee and Social Committee [Folketingets Euro-paudvalg og Socialudvalg] (April 18, 2002). Udtalelse fra Folketingets Europauvalg og Socialudvalg verørende Kommissionens grønbog om fremme af en europæisk ramme for virksomhedernes sociale ansvar. [Response from the European Committee and Social Committee in the Danish Parliament regarding the European Commission’s Green Paper on developing a European framework for CSR]. Europaudvalget, 2. samling (2001–2002), info-note I 116. Denmark: The Danish Parliament.
DiMaggio, T., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dobbin, F. (1994). Forging industrial policy. The United States, Britain, and France in the railway age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fligstein, N. (1991). The structural transformation of American industry: an institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms, 1919–1979. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 311–36). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–71.
Kruhøffer, A., & Høgelund, J. (2001). Virksomheders sociale engagement. Årbog 2001. [The social commitment of firms. Year book 2001]. Copenhagen: Socialforsknings-instituttet [Institute for Social Research].
Langfield-Smith, K. (1992). Exploring the need for a shared cognitive map. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3): 349–68.
Laukkanen, M. (1994). Comparative cause mapping of organizational cognitions. Organization Science, 5(3): 322–43.
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1997). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–63.
Ministry of Labour, Ministry of Business Affairs, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Social Affairs, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Economics, & Ministry of Finance [Arbejdsministeriet, Ehrvervsministeriet, Indenrigsministeriet, Social-ministeriet, Undervisningsministeriet, Økonomiministeriet, & Finansministeriet]. (April 2001). Brug foralle — Danmark 2010 og et mere remmeligt arbejdsmarked. [We need everyone — Denmark 2010 and a more inclusive labour market] Copenhagen: J. H. Schultz Grafisk A/S. Available: www.am.dk
Zerubavel, E. (1997). Social mindscapes. An invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Eva Boxenbaum
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boxenbaum, E. (2006). Social Construction as a Mode of Regulation: Reconstructing CSR in Denmark. In: Kakabadse, A., Morsing, M. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599574_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599574_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52066-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59957-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)