Skip to main content

Social Construction as a Mode of Regulation: Reconstructing CSR in Denmark

  • Chapter
Corporate Social Responsibility
  • 775 Accesses

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to show how social construction operates as a mode of self-regulation for businesses that voluntarily seek to become corporate citizens. Modes of regulation are of much contemporary interest. As the economic context is changing, new ways of regulating business behaviour are emerging. There is much debate, and little consensus, on appropriate business behaviour and acceptable modes of regulation. Regulation tends to be associated with one of two approaches: positive reinforcement of desirable behaviour, or negative reinforcement of undesirable behaviour. The former uses incentives (i.e., a carrot) to reward businesses for good behaviour. The incentives are often financial rewards (e.g., profit) that are seen as the direct or indirect result of good business behaviour. The aim is to encourage good behaviour. Negative reinforcement of undesirable behaviour comes as a punishment (i.e., a stick) for bad behaviour and takes the form of sanctions that are imposed on actors to prevent them from behaving in undesirable ways. For instance, legal sanctions can make it highly undesirable for businesses to act in certain ways. The objective here is to prevent bad behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 170.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Commission of the European Communities (July 18, 2001). Green paper. Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: Available: Europa. eu.int/comm/employment_social/soc-dial/csr/csr_index.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Parliament (April 17, 2001). L 149. Forslag til lov om sociale klausuler pÃ¥ offentlige tilskudsomrÃ¥der [Proposal for law about social obligations in areas of public financing]. Folketingets samling 2000–2001 [Parliamentary collection 2000–2001]. Available: www.folketinget.dk.

  • Danish Parliament, European Committee and Social Committee [Folketingets Euro-paudvalg og Socialudvalg] (April 18, 2002). Udtalelse fra Folketingets Europauvalg og Socialudvalg verørende Kommissionens grønbog om fremme af en europæisk ramme for virksomhedernes sociale ansvar. [Response from the European Committee and Social Committee in the Danish Parliament regarding the European Commission’s Green Paper on developing a European framework for CSR]. Europaudvalget, 2. samling (2001–2002), info-note I 116. Denmark: The Danish Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, T., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F. (1994). Forging industrial policy. The United States, Britain, and France in the railway age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (1991). The structural transformation of American industry: an institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms, 1919–1979. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 311–36). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruhøffer, A., & Høgelund, J. (2001). Virksomheders sociale engagement. Ã…rbog 2001. [The social commitment of firms. Year book 2001]. Copenhagen: Socialforsknings-instituttet [Institute for Social Research].

    Google Scholar 

  • Langfield-Smith, K. (1992). Exploring the need for a shared cognitive map. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3): 349–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, M. (1994). Comparative cause mapping of organizational cognitions. Organization Science, 5(3): 322–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1997). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Labour, Ministry of Business Affairs, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Ministry of Social Affairs, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Economics, & Ministry of Finance [Arbejdsministeriet, Ehrvervsministeriet, Indenrigsministeriet, Social-ministeriet, Undervisningsministeriet, Økonomiministeriet, & Finansministeriet]. (April 2001). Brug foralle — Danmark 2010 og et mere remmeligt arbejdsmarked. [We need everyone — Denmark 2010 and a more inclusive labour market] Copenhagen: J. H. Schultz Grafisk A/S. Available: www.am.dk

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1997). Social mindscapes. An invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Eva Boxenbaum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boxenbaum, E. (2006). Social Construction as a Mode of Regulation: Reconstructing CSR in Denmark. In: Kakabadse, A., Morsing, M. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599574_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics