Advertisement

The Other Side of Obligation: Cosmopolitan Distributive Justice and Duties of the Less Affluent

  • Luis Cabrera
Chapter
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

Cosmopolitan theorists of distributive justice have rightly given most of their attention to the obligations owed by those in affluent states to those in less-affluent states. Whether calling for direct transfers of resources across borders or, more recently, for some limited transformation of the Westphalian system, cosmopolitan theorists have focused on actions that individuals in rich states should feel compelled to take. In this chapter, I argue in part that strong critical emphasis also should be given to the duties of the global poor. Just as we are concerned with what the relatively fortunate should be asked to surrender of their resources, time and personal energies, we should avoid treating those in recipient states as mere objects of charity by failing to ask what contributions they might make to help improve their own circumstances. An approach is advocated here in which individuals in less-affluent states are viewed as global co-citizens working jointly with those in affluent states to improve economic and political conditions worldwide. Such an approach, I will argue, is consonant with a strong institutional cosmopolitanism, where the duties of all individuals include the promotion of democratically accountable economic and political integration between states in order to improve the life chances of the less-affluent globally.

Keywords

Distributive Justice North American Free Trade Agreement Ordinary Citizen Affluent State Southern African Development Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    C. Beitz, ‘Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism’, International Affairs, 75 (1999), 125–40, especially p. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Miller, ‘Debate. Caney’s “International Distributive Justice: A Response”’, Political Studies, 50 (2002), 974–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    World Bank, World Development Report 2004 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 253.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, The State of Food Insecurity in the World (2002), online at http://www.fao.org/sof/sofi/index_en.htm.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    J. Carens, ‘Migration and Morality: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective’, in B. Barry and R. Goodin (eds), Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and Money (University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992), pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    C. Beitz, Political Theory and International Relations, 2nd edn (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 152–3Google Scholar
  7. D. Moellendorf, Cosmopolitan Justice (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2002), pp. 78–84.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Pogge, ‘A Global Resources Dividend’, in D. A. Crocker and T. Linden (eds), Ethics of Consumption: The Good Life, Justice and Global Stewardship (Lanham, MD: Rowman … Littlefield, 1998), pp. 501–36.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Nussbaum, ‘Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 8 (2000), 176–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nussbaum, ‘Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism’, in J. Cohen (ed.), For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1996), pp. 2–17.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    B. Hooker, Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 162–4.Google Scholar
  12. Singer, One World: The Ethics of Globalization (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002), p. 189.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Parfit, Reasons and Persons (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 381–90;Google Scholar
  14. D. Parfit, ‘Symposium on Derek Parfit’s Reasons and Persons’, Ethics, 96 (1986), 703–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. T. Cowen, ‘What do We Learn from the Repugnant Conclusion?’, Ethics, 106 (1996), 754–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 14.
    O. O’Neill, Faces of Hunger (London: Allen & Unwin, 1989).Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    P. Singer, ‘Reconsidering the Famine Relief Argument’, in P. G. Brown and H. Shue (eds), Food Policy: The Responsibility of the United States in Life and Death Choices (New York, Free Press, 1977).Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    O. O’Neill, Bounds of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 163–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 17.
    K. Johnson, ‘Politics of International and Domestic Adoption in China’, Law … Society Review, 36 (2002), 379–96, esp. pp. 388–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 18.
    M. H. Cooper, ‘Foreign Aid after Sept. 11’, The CQ Researcher Online, 12 (2002), 361–92.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    P. Hoy, Players and Issues in International Aid (West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press, 1998), p. 71.Google Scholar
  22. World Bank, A Case for Aid: Building a Consensus for Development Assistance (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2002).Google Scholar
  23. 20.
    G. Crawford, Foreign Aid and Political Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Democracy Assistance and Political Conditionality (New York: Palgrave, 2001).Google Scholar
  24. 21.
    M. Holland, The European Union and the Third World (New York: Palgrave, 2002).Google Scholar
  25. 23.
    S. Kosack, ‘Effective Aid: How Democracy Allows Development Aid to Improve the Quality of Life’, World Development, 31 (2003), 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. World Bank, Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn’t and Why (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
  27. J. Beynon, ‘Policy Implications for Aid Allocations of Recent Research on Aid Effectiveness and Selectivity’, in B. M. Arvin (ed.), New Perspectives on Foreign Aid and Economic Development (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002), pp. 199–264.Google Scholar
  28. 25.
    A. F. Alesina and D. Dollar, ‘Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?’, NBER Working Paper No. W6612 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 1998), online at http://ssrn.com/abstract=226334.Google Scholar
  29. 26.
    J. P. Lewis, Pro-Poor Aid Conditionality: Policy Essay No 8 (Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council, 1993), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  30. 27.
    V. Miller, ‘The Human Rights Clause in the EU’s External Agreements’, House of Commons Library Research Paper 04/33, 16 April 2004, online at http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2004/rp04-033.pdf.Google Scholar
  31. 28.
    J. Stiglitz, Globalization and its Discontents (New York: W. W. Norton, 2002)Google Scholar
  32. 30.
    see C. Adam et al., ‘Performance-Based Conditionality: A European Perspective’, World Development, 32 (2004), 1, 059–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 32.
    T. Pogge, ‘Economic Justice and National Borders’, Re Vision, 22 (1999), 27–43;Google Scholar
  34. B. Barry, ‘Statism and Nationalism: A Cosmopolitan Critique’, in I. Shapiro and L. Brilmayer (eds), Nomos XLI: Global Justice (New York: New York University Press, 1999), pp. 12–66, p. 40;Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    J. Mayerfeld, ‘The Myth of Benign Group Identity: A Critique of Liberal Nationalism’, Polity, 30 (1998), 555–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 35.
    M. Nussbaum, ‘Women and Equality: The Capabilities Approach’, International Labour Review, 138 (1999), 227–53, esp. p. 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 36.
    E. Fierro, The EU’s Approach to Conditionality in Practice (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003), p. 157.Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    C. Brand, ‘Berlusconi to Plead for Leniency after Italy Violates EU Deficit Rules’, The Associated Press, 4 July 2004.Google Scholar
  39. 38.
    N. Nugent, The Government and Politics of the European Union, 5th edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), pp. 504–7.Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    J. McCormick, The European Union: Politics and Policies (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1999), p. 68.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    See A. Geddes, The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe (London: Sage, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    See W. Brown, The European Union and Africa: The Restructuring of North-South Relations (London: I. B. Tauris, 2002), pp. 2–4.Google Scholar
  43. 46.
    see L. Mead (ed.), The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press, 1997);Google Scholar
  44. G. Standing, Beyond the New Paternalism: Basic Security as Equality (London: Verso, 2002).Google Scholar
  45. 47.
    J. S. Mill, On Liberty and Other Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989);Google Scholar
  46. R. Sartorius (ed.), Paternalism (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1983);Google Scholar
  47. D. VanDeVeer, Paternalistic Intervention: The Moral Bounds on Benevolence (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. J. Feinberg, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    R. Pastor, Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 2001);Google Scholar
  50. R. Pastor and R. F. de Castro (eds), The Controversial Pivot: The USCongress and North America (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998), esp. ch. 8.Google Scholar
  51. 49.
    J. Brecher and T. Costello, Global Village or Global Pillage: Economic Reconstruction from the Bottom Up (Boston, MA: South End Press, 1994), pp. 97–102.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    J. Mercury and B. Schwartz, ‘Creating the Free Trade Area of the Americas: Linking Labour, the Environment, and Human Rights to the FTAA’, Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law, 1 (2001), 37–65;Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    J. Bhagwati, ‘Symposium: The Boundaries of the WTO: Afterword: The Question of Linkage’, American Journal of International Law, 96 (2002), 126–34;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. K. Jones, Who’s Afraid of the WTO? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    P Lamy, ‘What Are the Options After Seattle?’ Speech to European Parliament, Brussels, 25 January 2000, online at http://europa.eu.int/comm/commissioners/lamy/speeches_articles/spla09_en.htm.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    D. Bigman (ed.), Globalization and the Developing Countries: Emerging Strategies for Rural Development and Poverty Alleviation (Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Luis Cabrera 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Cabrera

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations