Postmodern Socialism Revisited

  • Peter Beilharz
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


Globalization rules, or at least globalization talk rules. All talk of socialism, meanwhile, melts into air. How has this come to be? A decade ago, at least in critical circles, the dominant keyword rather was the idea of the postmodern and it, also, had its influence, spreading into the dailies and talk shows. Whatever else it was, the idea of the postmodern was temporal, and it mixed anxiety and hope in the characteristic figure of the sublime. The postmodern was, notoriously, a negative or at best chronological marker, claiming a sense of ‘being after’, being after the modern, being after the postwar dream, the Keynesian Welfare State, after Fordism, after aesthetic modernism. It replayed an earlier period sense of boredom or ennui, a sense of loss, boredom, of only potential movement, later. Globalization, in contrast, is predominantly a spatial, and active term. It indicates boosterism, dynamism, or else rapaciousness and ruin.


Capitalist Development Critical Circle Mixed Anxiety Communist Manifesto Globalization Talk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Beilharz, Postmodern Socialism: Romanticism, City and State (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Beilharz, Transforming Labour: Labour Tradition and the Labour Decade in Australia (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Hirst and G. Thompson, Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance (Cambridge: Polity, 1996).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Robertson, Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture (London: Sage, 1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Castells, The Information Age (three volumes) (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1997, 1998, 2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Mann, ‘Globalization and September 11’, New Left Review 12 (2001), pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Kelly, The End of Certainty: The Story of the 1980s (London: Allen … Unwin, 1992).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Cassirer, Rousseau, Kant, Goethe: Two Essays (Hamden: Archon Books, 1961).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. Bauman, Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-Modernity and Intellectuals (Cambridge: Polity, 1987).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z. Bauman, Socialism: The Active Utopia (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1976).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Bauman, Towards a Critical Sociology: An Essay on Commonsense and Emancipation (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. W. S. Schiller, Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Beilharz, Labour’s Utopias: Bolshevism, Fabianism, Social Democracy (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Hardt and A. Negri, Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Beilharz, Trotsky, Trotskyism and the Transition to Socialism (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    M. Berman, All That is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity (London: Verso, 1983).Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    The presence of Deleuze in the text of Empire is marginal, but the spirit of vitalism is everywhere. Compare G. Deleuze, Bergsonism (New York: Zone, 1988).Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    M. Berman, Adventures in Marxism (London: Verso, 1999).Google Scholar
  19. 23.
    D. Ryazanoff (ed.), The Communist Manifesto of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (New York: Russell … Russell, 1963), p. 29;Google Scholar
  20. T. Carver, in M. Cowling (ed.), The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations (New York: New York University Press, 1998), p. 16;Google Scholar
  21. K. Marx and F. Engels, Werke, Vol. 4 (Berlin: Dietz, 1956-), p. 465.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Z. Bauman, Liquid Modernity (Cambridge: Polity, 2000);Google Scholar
  23. J. Urry, Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the 21st Century (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    Z. Bauman, Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds (Cambridge: Polity, 2003);Google Scholar
  25. Z. Bauman, Society Under Siege (Cambridge: Polity, 2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter Beilharz 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Beilharz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations