Advertisement

‘Horizontals’, ‘Verticals’ and the Conflicting Logics of Transformative Politics

  • Andrew Robinson
  • Simon Tormey
Chapter
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

Anyone who follows the politics of the Movement for Global Justice (MGJ) will be under no illusions as to the difficulty of the task that confronts it in terms of developing a politics that is effective as well as noisy. Within the movement (or, better, movement of movements) there are many different kinds of grouping as well as many different visions of global justice.1 In terms of the kinds of movement, there are obviously huge numbers of political parties. There are Marxist parties, green parties and more reformist or social democratic parties engaged with the process as well. There are activist groupings and networks such as People’s Global Action, Ya Basta! and the Wombles. There are NGOs such as Greenpeace and Oxfam. There are religious groupings. There are single issue activist groupings such as those campaigning for the abolition of debt or the installation of clean water supplies. There are representatives from governments and trade unions. There are all manner of hybrid or ‘in-between’ groups such as ATTAC, which is itself an umbrella for a variety of radicalisms and activisms.

Keywords

Political Party Global Justice Social Democratic Party Green Party Transformative Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    S. Tormey, Anti-Capitalism: A Beginner’s Guide (Oxford: Oneworld, 2004), chs 3 and 4.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    N. Klein, Fences and Windows (London: Flamingo, 2002).Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    R. Michels, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (New York: Transaction, 1998).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    F. F. Piven and R. A. Cloward, Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail (New York: Random House, 1988).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    M. Liebman, Leninism under Lenin (London: Merlin, 1975), pp. 162–80.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    M. Stirner, The Ego and its Own (London: Rebel Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    S. Tormey, ‘The 2003 European Social Forum: Where Next for the Anti-Capitalist Movement?’, Capital & Class, 84 (2004), 151–60.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    R. Fantasia, Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action and Contemporary American Workers (Stanford, CA: University of California Press, 1988);Google Scholar
  9. J. C. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992);Google Scholar
  10. D. Hecht and A. M. Simone, Invisible Governance: The Art of African Micro-Politics (New York: Autonomedia, 1994).Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    J.-P. Sartre, The Critique of Dialectical Reason, Volume 1 (London: Verso, 1976).Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    G. Genosko, Felix Guattari: An Aberrant Introduction (London: Continuum, 2002).Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    F. Guattari, Molecular Revolution: Psychiatry and Politics (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984), p. 191.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (London: Athlone Press, 1984), p. 470.Google Scholar
  15. 23.
    S. Žižek, The Sublime Object of Ideology (London: Verso, 1989), pp. 211–12.Google Scholar
  16. 24.
    L. Tolstoy, Government is Violence: Essays on Anarchism and Pacifism (London: Phoenix Press, 1990), p. 19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew Robinson and Simon Tormey 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Robinson
  • Simon Tormey

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations