Advertisement

Environmentalism as Globalization from Above and Below: Can World Watchers Truly Represent the Earth?

  • Timothy W. Luke
Chapter
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

This brief analysis reconsiders the cultural, ideological and practical dimensions of spatiality at the interface of the world environment and globalization, especially as they are being reimagined through global biocomplexity modelling as the key site for globalist intervention. By fusing environmentalism with globalism, many scientific experts and some major governmental and non-governmental science agencies are attempting to generate the theories and practices needed for managing ‘the environment’ on a local, regional, national and global level of operation. In their models, the prevailing procedures of ecomanagerialism1 are being reformatted through new ‘world watching’ technics in data-driven biocomplexity models.2 Such turns in basic scientific work deserve careful review, and this chapter begins that investigation of planetary ecomanagerialism as a mode of globalization.

Keywords

Earth System United Nations Environmental Program Everyday Reality Global Subject Contractual Proximates 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    T. W. Luke, ‘Environmentality as Green Governmentality’, in E. Darder (ed.), Discourses of the Environment (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1999).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. W. Luke, ‘Identity, Meaning and Globalization: Space-Time Compression and the Political Economy of Everyday Life’, in S. Lash, P. Heelas and P. Morris (eds), Detraditionalization: Critical Reflections on Authority and Identity (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1996), pp. 109–33;Google Scholar
  3. T. W. Luke, ‘Worldwatching at the Limits to Growth’, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 5 (1994), pp. 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    U. Beck, What is Globalization? (Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2000), p. 11.Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), Global Environmental Outlook (London: Earthscan, 2000).Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    National Science Foundation, Biocomplexity in the Environment (BE): Integrated Research and Education in Environmental Systems: Program Solicitation NSF 03-597 (Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 2003), online at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2003/nsf03597/nsf03597.htm#cnh;Google Scholar
  7. National Science Foundation, Complex Environmental Systems: Synthesis for Earth, Life, and Society in the 21st Century: A 10-Year Outlook for the National Science Foundation (Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 2003), online at http://www.nsf.gov/ere;Google Scholar
  8. National Science Foundation, Environmental Research and Education: Funding Opportunities: Biocomplexity in the Environment (Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 2003), online at http://www.nsf.gov/geo/ere/ere-web/fund-biocomplex.cfm;Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    C. Bright et al., State of the World: 2003 (Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, 2003); UNEP, Global Environmental Outlook.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    IHDP, International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change: Annual Report 2000 (Bonn: IHDP Secretariat, 2001), online at http://www.uni-bonn.de/ihdp;Google Scholar
  11. IPCC, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001);Google Scholar
  12. IPCC, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Contribution of Working Group II to the IPCC Third Assessment Report (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001);Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    D. Dickson, The New Politics of Science (New York: Pantheon, 1984), pp. 11–15.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    S. Jasanoff, The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    NSF, Cross Cutting Investment Strategies: NSF Priority Areas (2003), online at http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/publicat/nsf03009/cross/priority.htm.Google Scholar
  16. 21.
    J. C. Briden and T. E. Downing, Managing the Earth: The Lineacre Lectures 2001 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 2Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    FCCC, United Nations Framework on Climate Change (Bonn: FCCC Secretariat, 1995);Google Scholar
  18. FCCC, United Nations Framework on Climate (Bonn: FCCC Secretariat, 1992);Google Scholar
  19. WBGU, WissenschafftLicher Beirat Der Bundesregierung Globale Unweltveränderungen, ‘Szenario zur Ableitung Globaler CO2-Reduktionsziele und Umsetzsstrategium’ (Bremerhaven: WBGU, 1995);Google Scholar
  20. UNDP, Human Development Report 1996 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  21. 25.
    J. E. Lovelock, The Ages of Gaia: A Biography of our Living Earth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  22. 26.
    V. Petoukhov et al., ‘Cuimber-2: A Climate System Model of Intermediate Complexity: Part I: Model Description and Performance for Present Climate’, Climate Dynamics, 16 (2000), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 27.
    H.-J. Schellnhuber, ‘“Earth System” Analysis and the Second Coperican Revolution’, Nature, 402 (1999) suppl. C19–C23;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. H.-J. Schellnhuber, ‘Discourse: Earth System Analysis — the Concept’, in H.-J. Schellnhuber and V. Wenzel (eds), Earth System Analysis (Berlin: Springer, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 28.
    J. N. Thompson et al., ‘Frontiers of Ecology’, Bioscience, 51 (2001), 15–24;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. J. N. Thompson et al., Frontier of Ecology: Results of a Workshop held at NSF on December 6–8, 1999; Final Report: December 22 (1999), online at http://ibrcs.aibs.org/reports/pdf/Frontiers.pdf.Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    M. F. Acevedo et al., ‘NSF Award no. 0216722: Integrating Models of Natural and Human Dynamics in Forest Landscapes Across Scales and Cultures’, National Science Foundation BE/CNH Biocomplexity (Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 2002), online at http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/serv/eet/showaward?award+0216722.Google Scholar
  28. 31.
    M. De Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988), p. 117.Google Scholar
  29. 32.
    H. Lefebvre, The Urban Revolution (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2003), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  30. F. Dodds and T. Middleton, Earth Summit 2002: A New Deal (London: Earthscan, 2000).Google Scholar
  31. 39.
    T. W. Luke, Ecocritique: Contesting the Politics of Nature, Economy and Culture (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  32. 51.
    A. Jolly, ‘The Fifth Step’, New Scientist, 164 (1999), 78–9.Google Scholar
  33. 52.
    H. Nowotny, P. Scott and M. Gibbons, Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  34. 58.
    T. W. Luke, ‘Worldwatching at the Limits to Growth’, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 5 (1994), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Timothy W. Luke 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy W. Luke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations