Skip to main content

Correct Taste: the Material Conditions of Gentility

  • Chapter
  • 196 Accesses

Abstract

The genteel habitus required the right kind of environment in which to live, shaped by a battery of material goods to enable management of the self-controlled body and presentation of the self-conscious social person. Considered as performances both in private and in public, material goods constructed the stages on, and the props with which, to conduct the genteel life. To produce effective performances, the material appurtenances had to be the right kind, defined as correct taste, ‘the material counterpart of influence’.1 The precise calibration of setting, equipment and decoration could prove or disprove the middle-class person’s possession of the cultural capital of gentility. The assemblage of goods possessed presented messages about the actor to the audience, enabling others to classify the agent’s exact stratum within the possibilities that composed the nineteenth-century middle class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Leonore Davidoff and Catherine Hall, Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1750–1850 (London: Hutchison, 1987) p. 398.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elizabeth Gaskell, Cranford (London: OUP, 1934 [1853]) p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. J. Downing, The Architecture of Country Houses (New York: Dover Publications, 1969 [1850]) p. 407.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thorstein Veblen, The Theory of the Leisure Class (New York: Modern Library, 1934 [1899]) ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frederick B. Tolles, Quakers and the Atlantic Culture (New York: Macmillan, 1960) p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grant McCracken, Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988) pp. 32–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clive Wainwright, The Romantic Interior: The British Collector at Home 1750–1850 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989) chs 2, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The older tradition of consumption history is exemplified by E. J. Hobsbawm, The Age of Revolution, Europe 1789–1848 (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1962) ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Production-driven history is reviewed by Cary Carson, ‘The Consumer Revolution in Colonial British America: Why Demand?’, in Cary Carson, Ronald Hoffman and Peter J. Albert (eds), Of Consuming Interest: The Style of Life in the Eighteenth Century (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1994) pp. 483–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karl Marx, ‘Excerpts from James Mill’s Elements of Political Economy’, cited by Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984 [1979]) p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. E. Evans-Pritchard, The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Native People (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956) p. 233;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Norbert Elias, The Civilizing Process (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1994 [1939]) pp. 104–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Daniel Miller, Material Culture and Mass Consumption (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987) pp. 205, 216.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carole Shammas, The Pre-Industrial Consumer in England and America (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990) p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Consumer revolutions have been identified by historians since at least the sixteenth century, by Joan Thirsk, Economic Policy and Projects: The Development of a Consumer Society in Early Modern England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978);

    Google Scholar 

  16. the seventeenth century by Chandra Mukerji, From Graven Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  17. and Margaret Spufford, The Great Reclothing of Rural England: Petty Chapmen and their Wares in the Seventeenth Century (London: Hambledon Press, 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  18. the nineteenth century by Rosalind Williams, Dream Worlds: Mass Consumption in Late Nineteenth Century France (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  19. and T. J. Jackson Lears, ‘From Salvation to Self-Realization: Advertising and the Therapeutic Roots of the Consumer Culture, 1880–1930’, in Richard Wightman Fox and T. J. Jackson Lears (eds), The Culture of Consumption: Critical Essays in American History, 1880–1980 (New York: Pantheon, 1983);

    Google Scholar 

  20. and the twentieth century by Susan Strasser, Satisfaction Guaranteed: The Making of the American Mass Market (New York: Pantheon, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. and Daniel Miller, Material Culture and Mass Consumption (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Arthur J. Taylor (ed.), The Standard of Living in the Industrial Revolution (London: Methuen, 1975) p. 1. The same trend appears in the United States, best documented for a slightly earlier period: see Lorena S. Walsh, Gloria L. Main, Lois Green Carr, Jackson Turner Main and John J. McCusker, ‘Forum’ on the standard of living in the colonial era, William and Mary Quarterly, vol. XLV, no. 1 (January 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neil McKendrick, ‘Home Demand and Economic Growth: A New View of the Role of Women and Children in the Industrial Revolution’, in Neil McKendrick (ed.), Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society (London: Europa, 1974) pp. 172, 208.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See also Ivy Pinchbeck, Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution 1750–1850 (London: G. Routledge, 1930) pp. 215–21; Shammas, Pre-Industrial Consumer, p. 298.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paul A. Shackel, Personal Discipline and Material Culture: An Archaeology of Annapolis, Maryland, 1695–1870 (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1993) pp. 3, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Colin Campbell, The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987) p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mary Douglas and Baron Isherwood, The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980) pp. 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  28. For example, Ann Bermingham and John Brewer (eds), The Consumption of Culture 1600–1800: Image, Object, Text (London: Routledge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCracken, Culture and Consumption, pp. 62–4; Fred Davis, Fashion, Culture and Identity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992) pp. 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. [Samuel R. Wells], How to Behave: A Pocket Manual of Republican Etiquette (New York: Fowler & Wells, 1856) pp. 34, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  31. An American Gentleman, True Politeness: A Handbook of Etiquette for Gentlemen (Philadelphia: George S. Appleton, 1848) p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  32. James Laver, Modesty in Dress: An Inquiry into the Fundamentals of Fashion (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1969) pp. 55–6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Aileen Ribeiro, The Art of Dress: Fashion in England and France 1750–1820 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995) pp. 46–7.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Claudia B. Kidwell and Margaret C. Christman, Suiting Everyone: The Democratization of Clothing in America (Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1974) pp. 39–41;

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jane Ashelford, The Art of Dress: Clothes and Society 1500–1914 (London: National Trust/Laura Ashley, 1996) pp. 196–200.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Albert Smith, The Natural History of the Gent (London: David Bogue, 1847) pp. 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. C. Willet Cunnington and Phillis Cunnington, Handbook of English Costume in the Nineteenth Century (London: Faber, 1959) pp. 45–50; Ribeiro, Art of Dress, p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Anne Hollander, Sex and Suits (New York: Knopf, 1994) pp. 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Naomi Tarrant, The Development of Costume (London: Routledge, 1994) p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. C. Flugel, The Psychology of Clothes (London: Hogarth Press, 1930) pp. 111–12;

    Google Scholar 

  41. followed by David Kuchta, ‘The Making of the Self-Made Man: Class, Clothing and English Masculinity, 1688–1832’, in Victoria de Grazia (ed.), The Sex of Things: Gender and Consumption in Historical Perspective (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996) ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mrs Alexander Walker, Female Beauty As Preserved and Improved by Regimen, Cleanliness and Dress (revised and amended by an American editor) (New York: Scofield & Voorhies, 1840) pp. 25–6. The gigot or leg o’mutton sleeve arrived in the late 1820s and persisted into the late 1830s: Naomi E. Tarrant, The Rise and Fall of the Sleeve, 1825–1840 (Edinburgh: Royal Scottish Museum, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Patricia Wardle, Victorian Lace (London: Herbert Jenkins, 1968) pp. 221–7;

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pat Earnshaw, Lace Machines and Machine Laces (London: BT Batsford, 1986) chs 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Santina Levey, Lace: a History (London: Victoria & Albert Museum/W.S. Maney & Sons, 1983) pp. 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hugh Tait (ed.), The Art of the Jeweller: A Catalogue of the Hull Grundy Gift to the British Museum: Jewellery, Engraved Gems and Goldsmiths’ Work, vol. 2 (Plates) (London: British Museum, 1984) pp. 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hugh Tait (ed.), The Art of the Jeweller: A Catalogue of the Hull Grundy Gift to the British Museum: Jewellery, Engraved Gems and Goldsmiths’ Work, vol. 1 (Text) (London: British Museum, 1984) p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shirley Bury, An Introduction to Sentimental Jewellery (London: HMSO, 1985) pp. 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  49. For example, 1794–1835 diary of Sarah Snell Bryant of Cummington, MA, analysed by Jane C. Nylander, ‘Everyday Life on a Berkshire County Hill Farm’, in Eleanor McD. Thompson (ed.), The American Home: Material Culture, Domestic Space, and Family Life (Winterthur, DE: Winterthur Museum, 1998) pp. 108–15.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Natalie Rothstein (ed.), Barbara Johnson’s Album of Fashions and Fabrics (London: Thames & Hudson, 1987) p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  51. John Ruskin, The Crown of Wild Olive: Three Lectures on Work, Traffic, and War (London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1866) p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Katherine C. Grier, Culture and Comfort: People, Parlours and Upholstery, 1850–1930 (Rochester, NY: Strong Museum, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Loudon and Downing both assert the sacral value of Gothic style in the home. See also Colleen McDannell, The Christian Home in Victorian America, 1840–1900 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986) ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Clifford E. Clark, ‘Domestic Architecture as an Index to Social History: The Romantic Revival and the Cult of Domesticity in America, 1840–1870’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 7, no. 1 (1976) pp. 49–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. A Grier, Culture and Comfort, ch. 4.; Witold Rybcyzinski, Home: The Short History of an Idea (New York: Viking, 1986) ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Edward T. Joy, English Furniture 1800–1851 (London: Sotheby Parke Bernet Publications, 1977) p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  57. John Cornforth, English Interiors 1790–1848: The Quest for Comfort (London: Barrie & Jenkins, 1978) p. 15;

    Google Scholar 

  58. Siegfried Giedion, Mechanization Takes Command: A Contribution to Anonymous History (New York: Norton, 1969 [1948]) p. 292;

    Google Scholar 

  59. Henry Glassie, Folk Housing in Middle Virginia (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1975) p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kenneth L. Ames, Death in the Dining Room, and Other Tales of Victorian Culture (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992) pp. 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Karen Halttunen, Confidence Men and Painted Women: A Study of Middle-Class Culture in America, 1830–1870 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982) pp. 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Terence Lane and Jessie Serle, Australians at Home: A Documentary History of Australian Domestic Interiors from 1788 to 1914 (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1990) pp. 374]–6;

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kevin Fahy, ‘Furniture and Furniture-Makers’, in James Broadbent and Joy Hughes (eds), The Age of Macquarie (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1992) pp. 122–4.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Arthur Loesser, Men, Women and Pianos: A Social History (London: Victor Gollancz, 1955) pp. 267–79.

    Google Scholar 

  65. John Gloag, A Short Dictionary of Furniture, rev. edn (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1969) pp. 147, 731–2.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Elias, Civilizing Process, pp. 85–8; John F. Kasson, ‘Rituals of Dining: Table Manners in Victorian America’, in Kathryn Grover (ed.), Dining in America, 1850–1900 (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1987) pp. 130–41.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Paul A. Shackel, Personal Discipline and Material Culture: An Archaeology of Annapolis, Maryland, 1695–1870 (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1993) pp. 106–7, 144–50.

    Google Scholar 

  68. A. W. Coysh and R. K. Henrywood, The Dictionary of Blue and White Printed Pottery, 1780–1880 (Woodbridge, Suffolk: Antique Collectors Club, 1982) pp. 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Geoffrey Godden, ‘Chinese Export Porcelain’, in David Battie (ed.), Sotheby’s Concise Encyclopedia of Porcelain (Boston: Little, Brown, 1990) p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Jean McClure Mudge, Chinese Export Porcelain for the American Trade, 1785–1835 (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1962) ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  71. The salvage of wrecked cargoes of the early nineteenth century indicates that millions of pieces of fairly ordinary quality ceramics were loaded for the markets of the West; see Hugh Edwards, Treasures of the Deep: The Extraordinary Life and Times of Captain Mike Hatcher (Sydney: HarperCollins, 2000) chs 9 and 10.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Cf. Mark Girouard, Life in the English Country House (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980) pp. 293–4.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Leslie, House Book, p. 303; Carole Shammas, ‘The Domestic Environment in Early Modern England and America’, Journal of Social History, vol. 14, no. 1 (1980) p. 9; Jack Larkin, The Reshaping of Everyday Life, 1790–1840 (New York: Harper & Row, 1988) p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Loudon, Encyclopedia, p. 654. Downing, Country Houses, p. 419. See also Georg Himmelheber, Cast-iron Furniture and All Other Forms of Iron Furniture (London: Philip Wilson, 1996) pp. 41–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Linda Young

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Young, L. (2003). Correct Taste: the Material Conditions of Gentility. In: Middle-Class Culture in the Nineteenth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598812_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598812_7

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43277-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59881-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics