Abstract
I will preface this chapter with something I wrote in the introduction to my recent edition of A Game at Chess: ‘because the play is unique in so many ways, it is difficult to determine what terms of judgment to apply to any of its features. Was it the play that was unusual, or the manner or timing of its performance, or the way it was published in manuscript, or the political context within which it was written and received, or a mixture of these? We actually know so much about it (by contrast with virtually every other play of the period) that we finally have nothing with which we can properly compare it. And all judgements are ultimately a reading of the ideology of early modern theatre history as a whole, rather than of this single play’ (Dutton 1999, p. xxxiii). This applies to the censorship of the play (or lack of it) as much as to any other feature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2000 Richard Dutton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dutton, R. (2000). Middleton: the Censorships of A Game at Chess. In: Licensing, Censorship and Authorship in Early Modern England. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598713_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598713_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40508-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59871-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)