Skip to main content
  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

I will preface this chapter with something I wrote in the introduction to my recent edition of A Game at Chess: ‘because the play is unique in so many ways, it is difficult to determine what terms of judgment to apply to any of its features. Was it the play that was unusual, or the manner or timing of its performance, or the way it was published in manuscript, or the political context within which it was written and received, or a mixture of these? We actually know so much about it (by contrast with virtually every other play of the period) that we finally have nothing with which we can properly compare it. And all judgements are ultimately a reading of the ideology of early modern theatre history as a whole, rather than of this single play’ (Dutton 1999, p. xxxiii). This applies to the censorship of the play (or lack of it) as much as to any other feature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Richard Dutton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dutton, R. (2000). Middleton: the Censorships of A Game at Chess. In: Licensing, Censorship and Authorship in Early Modern England. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598713_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics