Abstract
In Felix Holt, the process of renovating a communal tradition already involves a search for a new form of moral guidance; the same search continues in Middlemarch. In particular, the novel shows a constant effort to bring Dorothea’s altruistic aspirations, especially her ardent preoccupation with ‘the world’s misery’ (M, 9:76), to bear on the question of establishing a spiritual faith. This interpretative relevance is achieved in part by embodying Dorothea’s earthly experience in a language of communal insights such as hagiographic and mythological allusions. The novel thus starts with the life of Saint Theresa of Avila, which prepares the stage for the arrival of the later-born ‘Saint Dorothea’: ‘That child-pilgrimage was a fit beginning’ (M, ‘Prelude’:3).1 The everyday dimension of Dorothea’s spiritual pursuit has been discussed, often with great insight, in terms of the ‘personal’ and the ‘interpersonal’.2 Yet, a strong tendency towards ‘impersonality’ is also evident in the language of such a secular religion which is defined by Dorothea as ‘not what you know about religion, but the belief that helps you most’ (M, 39:383). Often the moral implications of altruistic acts may not directly affect a character’s psychology when such an effect is suggested or implied in the narration. But this lack of psychological access will reveal itself only when examined with reference to the novel’s representation of the personal and the interpersonal, since this impersonality is mostly shown through its relations to both.
… the highest form of existence is Altruism, or that moral and intellectual condition which is determined by the fullest consciousness—emotional and cognitive—of relations.
(George Henry Lewes, FC, II, 27)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Several studies trace the sources of these allusions back to Anna Jameson’s books on Christian legends, fairy tales and saints. See for example, Beer, ‘Myth and Single Consciousness’, and Susan Stiritz, ‘An Enigma Solved: The “Theresa” Metaphor’, in Perspectives on Self and Community in George Eliot: Dorothea’s Window, edited by Patricia Gately, Dennis Leavens and D. Dole Woodcox (Lewiston, NY, 1997), pp. 58–101.
See, for instance, Hardy, ‘Middlemarch: Public and Private Worlds’, in Particularities, pp. 104–25; J. Hillis Miller, The Form of Victorian Fiction: Thackeray, Dickens, Trollope, George Eliot, Meredith and Hardy (Notre Dame, 1968), pp. 93–6 and 113–25.
Beer, ‘Myth and Single Consciousness’, p. 96. My discussions in the rest of this chapter are helped by the following studies of mythological representation and interpretation in Middlemarch: Beer, ‘Myth and Single Consciousness’; Knoepflmacher, ‘Fusing Fact and Myth: The New Reality of Middlemarch’, in This Particular Web: Essays on ‘Middlemarch’, edited by Ian Adam (Toronto, 1975), pp. 43–72; Harvey, ‘Intellectual Background’;
Brian Swann, ‘Middlemarch and Myth’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 28 (1973), pp. 210–14;
and Joseph Wiesenfarth, George Eliot’s Mythmaking (Heidelberg, 1977), pp. 186–209. For Eliot’s own readings on ancient myth and fables, see Carroll, ‘Introduction’ to M, p. xx, and GEN, II, 104–6, 149–50, 156.
George Eliot: The Critical Heritage, edited by David Carroll (London, 1971), p. 463.
On this analogy, see Carroll, ‘Unity Through Analogy: An Interpretation of Middlemarch’, Victorian Studies, 2 (1959), pp. 305–16,
and Michael York Mason, ‘Middlemarch and History’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 25 (1971), pp. 417–31.
For the relation of the Saint Theresa story to the character of Dorothea, see Hilary S. Fraser, ‘St. Theresa, St. Dorothea and Miss Brooke in Middlemarch’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 40 (1986), pp. 400–11; Myers, Teaching of George Eliot, pp. 203–6;
Jill Matus, ‘Saint Teresa, Hysteria, and Middlemarch, Journal of the History of Sexuality, 1:2 (1990), pp. 215–40; and Stiritz, ‘An Enigma Solved: The “Theresa” Metaphor’.
George Barnett Smith, ‘George Eliot’, The Saint Paul’s Magazine, 12 (1873), pp. 592–616 (p. 593).
W. E. Houghton, The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870 (New Haven, 1957), p. 187, where he quotes from J. A. Froude’s ‘England and Her Colonies’.
Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by D. D. Raphael and A. L. MacFie (1759; Oxford, 1976), p. 9; Rubinoff, ‘Editor’s Introduction’, in Bradley, Presuppositions, pp. 1–72 (p. 42).
See Beer, ‘Circulatory Systems: Money, Gossip and Blood in Middlemarch’, in Arguing with the Past: Essays in Narrative from Woolf to Sidney (London, 1989), pp. 99–116.
See Calvin Bedient, Architects of the Self: George Eliot, D. H. Lawrence and E. M. Forster (London, 1972), p. 13;
Michael York Mason, ‘Middlemarch and Science: Problems of Life and Mind’, Review of English Studies, 22 (1971), pp. 151–69 (pp. 168–9);
Elizabeth Ermarth, George Eliot (Boston, 1985), p. 29.
D. F. Strauss, The Life of Jesus Critically Examined, translated by Marian Evans, 3 vols (London, 1846), I, p. 42; original emphasis.
Nineteenth-century critics of novel-writing were particularly concerned with the unity of fiction. There was some insistence on dramatic unity as against thematic unity. See Victorian Criticism of the Novel, edited by Edwin M. Eigner and George J. Worth (Cambridge, 1985), p. 6.
Eliot had a strong background in contemporary studies of mythology. Around the time of writing Middlemarch, she read Müller’s Lectures on the Science of Language (including materials on mythology) with great interest. See Wiesenfarth, A Writer’s Notebook: 1854–1879 and Uncollected Writings (Charlottesville, 1981), p. xxxii. For Eliot’s interest in Müller’s work, see Collins, ‘Questions of Method’, pp. 396–8. For a detailed discussion of Eliot’s interest in the evolution of language, and of similar interests during the nineteenth century in general, see Beer, Darwin’s Plots, especially pp. 120–3, and 177–9.
Language and Myth, translated by Susanne K. Langer (New York, 1946), p. 43.
Eliade, Myth and Reality (London, 1964), p. 124.
Eliade, The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion, translated by Willard R. Trask (New York, 1959), p. 112.
See Joseph W. Childers, ‘Carlyle’s Past and Present, History, and a Question of Hermeneutics’, Clio, 13 (1983–4), pp. 247–58 (p. 248).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Hao Li
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, H. (2000). The Language of Secular Religion in Middlemarch. In: Memory and History in George Eliot. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598607_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598607_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39947-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59860-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)