Skip to main content

Between Fedora and Fez: Modern Turkey’s Troubled Road to Democratic Consolidation and the Pluralizing Role of Erdoğan’s Pro-Islam Government

  • Chapter
Turkey and the European Union

Abstract

In October 2003, the Turkish Republic celebrated its eightieth anniversary, and for many believers in the Kemalist principles under which it was founded, the election a year earlier of Tayyip Erdoğan’s pro-Islam Justice and Development Party (AKP) did not contribute to the festive mood at all. Still, after more than three years into its mandate, Erdoğan’s government has arguably proven to be far from as negative a development as had been widely feared. On the contrary, AKP’s tenure has presented a significant opportunity towards the reconciliation — that is, coexistence — between Islamic and Kemalist republican elements regarding the character of the Turkish state, and therefore towards the pluralizing of a hitherto monolithic, laicist, top-down prescribed identity to reflect the modern socio-political, cultural and demographic realities of modern Turkey While its outcome is by no means certain or complete, this latest endeavour to expand the Turkish socio-political and civic space may strengthen substantially the pace for democratic consolidation in modern Turkey.

After a century of Westernization, Turkey has undergone immense changes — greater than any outside observer had thought possible. But the deepest Islamic roots of Turkish life and culture are still alive, and the ultimate identity of Turk and Muslim in Turkey is still unchallenged.

Bernard Lewis, The Emergence of Modern Turkey

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Bernard Lewis, The Emergence of Modern Turkey, 2nd edn (London: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 482–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elizabeth Özdalga, The Veiling Issue: Official Secularism and Popular Islam in Modern Turkey (Richmond, Surrey, UK: Curzon Press, 1998), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Binnaz Sayari, Religion and Political Development in Turkey. PhD dissertation. City University of New York (Ann Arbor, MI: Xerox University Microfilms, 1976), p. 116–25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ozay Mehmet, Islamic Identity and Development: Studies of the Islamic Periphery (London: Routledge, 1990), p. 126.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Sydney Fischer, The Middle East, A History (New York: Knopf, 1979), pp. 426–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Ernest Gellner, Nations and Nationalism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983), p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ilkay Sunar, ‘State, Society and Democracy in Turkey’, in Vojtech Mastny and R. Craig Nation, eds, Turkey Between East and West: New Challenges for a Rising Regional Power (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996), pp. 141–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Max Weber, the main authority in legitimacy theory, offers three ways in which an authority can gain legitimacy: (1) traditional — based on inheritance; (2) charismatic — resting upon a leader’s talents, and (3) rational-legal — based on popular acceptance of a set of governing rules. See Weber, Staatssoziologie (Berlin: Dunkert & Humbolt, 1956), p. 28

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seymour M. Lipset, ‘The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited’, American Sociological Review 59 (1994), 1: 1–22, p. 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dietrich Jung with Wolfango Piccoli, Turkey at the Crossroads: Ottoman Legacies and a Greater Middle East (London: Zed Books, 2001), p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Resat Kasaba, The Ottoman Empire and the World Economy in the Nineteenth Century (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1988), pp. 57 and 110).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Canan Asian, Party-Building and Democratization: The Case of Turkey, 1983–1995 (Montreal: McGill University, Doctoral dissertation (unpublished), 2001), p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ergun Ozbudun, Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Çigdem Balim, Ersin Kalaycioğlu, Cevat Karataş, Gareth Winrow and Feroz Yasamee, eds, Turkey: Political, Social and Economic Challenges in the 1990s (New York: Brill, 1995), p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  15. His brother held a high position in the Nakşibendi order; see Erik Cornell, Turkey in the 21st Century: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats (Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press, 2001), p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haldun Giilalp, ‘Political Islam in Turkey: The Rise and Fall of the Refah Party’, Muslim World 89 (1999), 1: 22–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. James Pettifer, The Turkish Labyrinth: Atatürk and the New Islam (London: Viking Press, 1997), p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London: Allen & Unwin, 1943), p. 269.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. For example, Huntington calls ‘elections, open free and fair’ essential for democracy, the inescapable sine qua non (Samuel Huntington, ‘Democracy’s Third Wave’, Journal of Democracy 2 (1991), 2:12–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Adam Przeworski and Fernando Limongi, ‘Modernization: Theories and Facts’, World Politics 49 (1997), 2: 155–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. See, for example, Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, ‘Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe’ (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Philippe Schmitter and Terry Lynne Karl, ‘What Democracy Is ... and Is Not’, Journal of Democracy 2 (1991), 3: 75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Larry Diamond, ‘Is the Third Wave Over?’, Journal of Democracy 7 (1996), 2: 20–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robert Dahl, Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982), p. 11

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guillermo O’Donnell, ‘Illusions About Consolidation’, Journal of Democracy 7 (1996), 2: 34–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. See Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, ‘Towards Consolidated Democracies’, Journal of Democracy 7 (1996), 2: 14–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hough Poulton, Top Hat, Grey Wolf and Crescent (New York: New York University Press, 1997), p. 101

    Google Scholar 

  28. In Robin Wright, ‘Islam and Liberal Democracy: Two Visions of Reformation’, Journal of Democracy 7 (1996), 2: 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. It also represents a large segment of what Nancy Tapper and Richard Tapper call ‘Middle Turkey’ — an ‘unselfconscious blend of Kemalist Republicans and urban Islam’; Nancy Tapper and Richard Tapper, ‘The Birth of the Prophet: Ritual and Gender in Turkish Islam’, Man 22 (1987), 1: 69–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. For an authoritative account of confessional party formation in early modern Europe and eventual secularization of politics, see Stathis Kalyvas, The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  31. For example, witness the unsuccessful Kurdish uprisings in the early decades of the Republic (1925, 1937) and the ensuing state policy of cultural and linguistic homogenization, as well as the latest ultra-violent, terrorizing conflict between Kurdish Marxist guerillas (the PKK) and Turkish military forces that lasted from 1984 to 1999. See Ioannis N. Grigoriadis and Ali M. Ansari, ‘Turkish and Iranian Nationalisms’, in Youssef Choueiri, ed., A Companion to the History of the Middle East (London: Blackwell, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nadire Mater (trans, by Ayse Gul Altinay), Voices from the Front: Turkish Soldiers on the War with the Turkish Guerrillas (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peter Beyer, Globalization and Religion (London: Sage 1994), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Opening up political space and offering a legitimate voice to such groups could offer a viable and realistic alternative to the prospect of exit. Besides Hirschman’s seminal book Exit, Voice, Loyalty: Responses to Declines in Firms, Organizations and States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Michael Hechter, ‘Nationalism and Rationality’, Journal of World-Systems Research 6 (2000), 2: 308–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hudson Meadwell, ‘The Politics of Nationalism in Quebec’, World Politics 45 (2003), 2: 203–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Philip G. Roeder, ‘Soviet Federalism and Ethnic Mobilization’, World Politics, 43 (1991), 2: 196–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Robert McDonald, ‘Islamists to the Fore in Turkey’s Pursuit of EU Membership’, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 7 (2005), 1: 103–08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Spyridon Kotsovilis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kotsovilis, S. (2006). Between Fedora and Fez: Modern Turkey’s Troubled Road to Democratic Consolidation and the Pluralizing Role of Erdoğan’s Pro-Islam Government. In: Joseph, J.S. (eds) Turkey and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598584_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics