Advertisement

Between Fedora and Fez: Modern Turkey’s Troubled Road to Democratic Consolidation and the Pluralizing Role of Erdoğan’s Pro-Islam Government

  • Spyridon Kotsovilis

Abstract

In October 2003, the Turkish Republic celebrated its eightieth anniversary, and for many believers in the Kemalist principles under which it was founded, the election a year earlier of Tayyip Erdoğan’s pro-Islam Justice and Development Party (AKP) did not contribute to the festive mood at all. Still, after more than three years into its mandate, Erdoğan’s government has arguably proven to be far from as negative a development as had been widely feared. On the contrary, AKP’s tenure has presented a significant opportunity towards the reconciliation — that is, coexistence — between Islamic and Kemalist republican elements regarding the character of the Turkish state, and therefore towards the pluralizing of a hitherto monolithic, laicist, top-down prescribed identity to reflect the modern socio-political, cultural and demographic realities of modern Turkey While its outcome is by no means certain or complete, this latest endeavour to expand the Turkish socio-political and civic space may strengthen substantially the pace for democratic consolidation in modern Turkey.

Keywords

Turkish Society Democratic Consolidation Turkish State Electoral Victory Electoral Democracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    Bernard Lewis, The Emergence of Modern Turkey, 2nd edn (London: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 482–3.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Elizabeth Özdalga, The Veiling Issue: Official Secularism and Popular Islam in Modern Turkey (Richmond, Surrey, UK: Curzon Press, 1998), p. 19.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Binnaz Sayari, Religion and Political Development in Turkey. PhD dissertation. City University of New York (Ann Arbor, MI: Xerox University Microfilms, 1976), p. 116–25.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Ozay Mehmet, Islamic Identity and Development: Studies of the Islamic Periphery (London: Routledge, 1990), p. 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. N. Sydney Fischer, The Middle East, A History (New York: Knopf, 1979), pp. 426–33.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    See Ernest Gellner, Nations and Nationalism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983), p. 142.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Ilkay Sunar, ‘State, Society and Democracy in Turkey’, in Vojtech Mastny and R. Craig Nation, eds, Turkey Between East and West: New Challenges for a Rising Regional Power (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996), pp. 141–6.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Max Weber, the main authority in legitimacy theory, offers three ways in which an authority can gain legitimacy: (1) traditional — based on inheritance; (2) charismatic — resting upon a leader’s talents, and (3) rational-legal — based on popular acceptance of a set of governing rules. See Weber, Staatssoziologie (Berlin: Dunkert & Humbolt, 1956), p. 28Google Scholar
  9. Seymour M. Lipset, ‘The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited’, American Sociological Review 59 (1994), 1: 1–22, p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 12.
    Dietrich Jung with Wolfango Piccoli, Turkey at the Crossroads: Ottoman Legacies and a Greater Middle East (London: Zed Books, 2001), p. 118.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    Resat Kasaba, The Ottoman Empire and the World Economy in the Nineteenth Century (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1988), pp. 57 and 110).Google Scholar
  12. Canan Asian, Party-Building and Democratization: The Case of Turkey, 1983–1995 (Montreal: McGill University, Doctoral dissertation (unpublished), 2001), p. 88.Google Scholar
  13. 27.
    Ergun Ozbudun, Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2000).Google Scholar
  14. 28.
    Çigdem Balim, Ersin Kalaycioğlu, Cevat Karataş, Gareth Winrow and Feroz Yasamee, eds, Turkey: Political, Social and Economic Challenges in the 1990s (New York: Brill, 1995), p. 91.Google Scholar
  15. 33.
    His brother held a high position in the Nakşibendi order; see Erik Cornell, Turkey in the 21st Century: Opportunities, Challenges, Threats (Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press, 2001), p. 97.Google Scholar
  16. 39.
    Haldun Giilalp, ‘Political Islam in Turkey: The Rise and Fall of the Refah Party’, Muslim World 89 (1999), 1: 22–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 40.
    James Pettifer, The Turkish Labyrinth: Atatürk and the New Islam (London: Viking Press, 1997), p. 134.Google Scholar
  18. 47.
    Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London: Allen & Unwin, 1943), p. 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 48.
    For example, Huntington calls ‘elections, open free and fair’ essential for democracy, the inescapable sine qua non (Samuel Huntington, ‘Democracy’s Third Wave’, Journal of Democracy 2 (1991), 2:12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Adam Przeworski and Fernando Limongi, ‘Modernization: Theories and Facts’, World Politics 49 (1997), 2: 155–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 49.
    See, for example, Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, ‘Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe’ (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  22. 50.
    Philippe Schmitter and Terry Lynne Karl, ‘What Democracy Is ... and Is Not’, Journal of Democracy 2 (1991), 3: 75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larry Diamond, ‘Is the Third Wave Over?’, Journal of Democracy 7 (1996), 2: 20–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 51.
    Robert Dahl, Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982), p. 11Google Scholar
  25. 53.
    Guillermo O’Donnell, ‘Illusions About Consolidation’, Journal of Democracy 7 (1996), 2: 34–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 56.
    See Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, ‘Towards Consolidated Democracies’, Journal of Democracy 7 (1996), 2: 14–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 67.
    Hough Poulton, Top Hat, Grey Wolf and Crescent (New York: New York University Press, 1997), p. 101Google Scholar
  28. 74.
    In Robin Wright, ‘Islam and Liberal Democracy: Two Visions of Reformation’, Journal of Democracy 7 (1996), 2: 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 75.
    It also represents a large segment of what Nancy Tapper and Richard Tapper call ‘Middle Turkey’ — an ‘unselfconscious blend of Kemalist Republicans and urban Islam’; Nancy Tapper and Richard Tapper, ‘The Birth of the Prophet: Ritual and Gender in Turkish Islam’, Man 22 (1987), 1: 69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 79.
    For an authoritative account of confessional party formation in early modern Europe and eventual secularization of politics, see Stathis Kalyvas, The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  31. 83.
    For example, witness the unsuccessful Kurdish uprisings in the early decades of the Republic (1925, 1937) and the ensuing state policy of cultural and linguistic homogenization, as well as the latest ultra-violent, terrorizing conflict between Kurdish Marxist guerillas (the PKK) and Turkish military forces that lasted from 1984 to 1999. See Ioannis N. Grigoriadis and Ali M. Ansari, ‘Turkish and Iranian Nationalisms’, in Youssef Choueiri, ed., A Companion to the History of the Middle East (London: Blackwell, 2005)Google Scholar
  32. Nadire Mater (trans, by Ayse Gul Altinay), Voices from the Front: Turkish Soldiers on the War with the Turkish Guerrillas (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
  33. 88.
    Peter Beyer, Globalization and Religion (London: Sage 1994), p. 26.Google Scholar
  34. 90.
    Opening up political space and offering a legitimate voice to such groups could offer a viable and realistic alternative to the prospect of exit. Besides Hirschman’s seminal book Exit, Voice, Loyalty: Responses to Declines in Firms, Organizations and States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970)Google Scholar
  35. Michael Hechter, ‘Nationalism and Rationality’, Journal of World-Systems Research 6 (2000), 2: 308–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hudson Meadwell, ‘The Politics of Nationalism in Quebec’, World Politics 45 (2003), 2: 203–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Philip G. Roeder, ‘Soviet Federalism and Ethnic Mobilization’, World Politics, 43 (1991), 2: 196–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 91.
    Robert McDonald, ‘Islamists to the Fore in Turkey’s Pursuit of EU Membership’, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 7 (2005), 1: 103–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Spyridon Kotsovilis 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Spyridon Kotsovilis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations