Abstract
Foreign-owned firms in manufacturing have substantially higher labour productivity than domestically owned ones. This basic feature of the UK economy has been known for some time (Davies and Lyons, 1991). The UK is not unique in this respect: the same is true of countries such as the United States (Doms and Jensen, 1998) and Canada (Globerman etal., 1994). For the UK, the productivity gap at the firm level has been documented by Oulton (1998b); similar findings are reported by Griffith (1999a, 1999b) and in the paper by Girma et al. in this volume.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baily, M.N. and Gersbach, H. (1995), ‘Efficiency in manufacturing and the need for global competition’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1995, pp. 307–47.
Barrell, R. and Pain, N. (1997), ‘Foreign direct investment, technological change, and economic growth within Europe’, Economic Journal, 107 (November), pp. 1770–86.
Berman, E., Bound, J. and Griliches, Z. (1994),‘Changes in the demand for skilled labor within U.S. manufacturing: evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufacturing’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109 (May), pp. 367–97.
Caballero, R.J. (1997), ‘Aggregate investment’, NBER Working Paper No. 6264, Cambridge, Mass., National Bureau of Economic Research.
Chirinko, R.S. (1993), ‘Business fixed investment spending: a critical survey of modelling strategies, empirical results, and policy implications’, Journal of Economic Literature, 31 (December), pp. 1875–1911.
Davies, S.W. and Lyons, B.R. (1991), ‘Characterising relative performance: the productivity advantage of foreign owned firms in the UK’, Oxford Economic Papers, 43 (October), pp. 584–95.
Doms, M.E. and Jensen, J.B. (1998), ‘Comparing wages, skills, and productivity between domestic and foreign owned manufacturing establishments in the United States’, in Baldwin, R., Lipsey, R. and Richardson, J. (eds), Geography and Ownership as Bases for Economic Accounting, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Dunning, J.H. (1981), International Production and the Multinational Enterprise, London, George Allen and Unwin.
Fallon, P.R. and Layard, P.R.G. (1975), ‘Capital-skill complement arity, income distribution, and output accounting’, Journal of Political Economy, 83, 2, pp. 279–301.
Fraumeni, B. (1997), ‘The measurement of depreciation in the U.S. national income and product accounts’, Survey of Current Business, July, pp. 7–23.
Globerman, S., Ries, J.C. and Vertinsky, I. (1994), ‘The economic performance of foreign affiliates in Canada’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 27, 1 (February), pp. 143–56.
Goldin, C. and Katz, L.F. (1998), ‘The origins of technology-skill complementarity’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 3, pp. 693–732.
Griffith, R. (1999a), ‘Using the ARD establishment level data to look at foreign ownership and productivity in the United Kingdom’, Economic Journal, 109, pp. 416–42.
(1999b), ‘Productivity and foreign ownership in the UK car industry’, IFS Working Paper no. 99/11.
Griliches, Z. (1965), ‘Capital-skill complementarity’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, pp. 465–8.
Hart, P.E. and Oulton, N. (1996), ‘Growth and size of firm’, The Economic Journal, 106, pp. 1242–52.
(1999), ‘Gibrat, Galton and job generation’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6, 2, pp. 149–64.
Hubbard, G. (1998), ‘Capital-market imperfections and investment’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (March), pp. 193–225.
Miles, D. (1993), ‘Testing for short termism in the UK stock market’, Economic Journal, 103, pp. 1379–96.
Nickell, S. (1995), The Performance of Companies, Oxford, Blackwell.
(1996), ‘Competition and corporate performance’, Journal of Political Economy, 104, pp. 724–46.
O’Mahony, M. (1999), Britain s Productivity Performance 1950–1996: An International Perspective, London, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
Oulton, N. (1997), ‘The ABI Respondents Database: a new resource for industrial economics research’, Economic Trends, 528 (November), pp. 46–57.
(1998a), ‘Competition and the dispersion of labour productivity amongst UK companies’, Oxford Economic Papers, 50, pp. 23–38.
(1998b), ‘Investment, capital and foreign ownership in UK manufacturing’, National Institute of Economic and Social Research Discussion Paper No. 141 (August).
(1998c), ‘Labour productivity and foreign ownership in the UK’, National Institute of Economic and Social Research Discussion Paper No. 143 (September).
(2000), ‘Labour productivity and foreign ownership in the UK’, mimeo. [A revised and expanded version of Oulton, 1998c]
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 National Institute of Economic and Social Research
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oulton, N. (2001). Why do foreign-owned firms in the UK have higher labour productivity?. In: Pain, N. (eds) Inward Investment Technological Change and Growth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598447_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598447_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42518-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59844-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)