Abstract
Interest in the concept of legitimacy comes and goes in cycles. It becomes an object of academic — even public — debate whenever the state of affairs covered by this term is in doubt or ‘in crisis’. At the same time, this state of affairs appears to be as elusive as the concept of legitimacy is said to be ambiguous. Does this point to the fact that there is no such thing as ‘objective legitimacy?’ Perhaps Max Weber (1978) was right, after all, in stating that legitimacy is nothing more nor less than the belief in it — a quality that, like beauty, only exists in the eye of the beholder.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Heidrun Abromeit and Michael Stoiber
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abromeit, H., Stoiber, M. (2007). Criteria of Democratic Legitimacy. In: Hurrelmann, A., Schneider, S., Steffek, J. (eds) Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598393_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598393_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35577-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59839-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)