Advertisement

‘Blind Bargaining’ and the Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Recipient States: The Case of Post-Soviet and Eastern European Countries

  • Nataliya Ass
  • Matthias Beck
Part of the Centre for the Study of Emerging Markets Series book series (CSEM)

Abstract

In recent years foreign direct investment (FDI) has become increasingly important for transition and developing economies. This emphasis on FDI is closely related to the ongoing globalization of world economic processes and the concomitant increase in international capital flows. Among transition economies, in particular, there is belief that the process of building a compatible economic infrastructure requires mobilization not only of national resources but also of the involvement of investment sources which are situated beyond the borders of the domestic economy (Lazebnyk 1997:84). In this context, large-scale diversified international investment activity has often been considered as one of the main leverages for the long-term development of a highly integrated economy (Zaxarin 2000:88–89). Recipient states with positive attitudes towards FDI typically expect that the utilization of foreign investment will provide them with access to contemporary technologies and management, contribute to the creation of national investment markets, increase the efficiency of both production factors and goods markets, maintain macroeconomic stabilization and facilitate the solution of social problems which might have arisen during the transitional period (Maxmudov 1998:39–40).

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Foreign Investment Eastern European Country Trade Balance Foreign Direct Investment Inflow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bachrach, P. and M.S. Baratz (1970) Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 220.Google Scholar
  2. Bacharach, R. and E.J. Lawler (1981) Bargaining: Power, Tactics, and Outcomes. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass, p. 234.Google Scholar
  3. Baun, D. (1999) ‘Mozhlyvosti ta Ryzyky dlya Inozemnyx Investytsii v Ukrainskyi Gazovyi Sector’(Opportunities and risks for Foreign Investment in the Ukrainian Gas Sector), Economist, 6, 68–72. Kyiv, Ukraine.Google Scholar
  4. Benderskii, E. (1998) ‘Rol Investitsii I Innovatsii v Restructurizatsii Ekonomiky’ (The Role of Investments and Innovations in the Economy Restructuring), Economy of Ukraine, 9, 37–48. Kyiv, Ukraine.Google Scholar
  5. Danko, M. (1999), ‘Innovatiinyi Potentsial u Promyslovosty Ukrainy’ (Novelty Potential of Ukrainian Industry), Economist, 10, 29–32. Kyiv, Ukraine.Google Scholar
  6. Dyker, D. (1999) Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer in the Former Soviet Union. Cheltenham: Elgar, p. 205.Google Scholar
  7. Filipenko, A. (1997) ‘Osoblyvosti Rozvytku Inozemnogo Investuvannya v Economiku Ukrainy’, (Distinctive Features of Foreign Investment in Ukrainian Economy), Finance of Ukraine, 2, 81–3.Google Scholar
  8. Hay, C. (1997) ‘Divided by a Common Language: Political Theory and Concept of Power’, Politics, 1(17), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IMF (2003) Ukraine: Selected Issues, IMF Country Reports, no. 03/173, 69. Kovalishin, P. and A. Starostin (1999) ‘Problemy Inozemnogo Investuvannya’ (Problems of Foreign Investment), Finance of Ukraine, 11, 78–85.Google Scholar
  10. Kulchytskyi, M. (1998) ‘Investytsiine Zabezpechennya Rozvvytku Vyrobnychoi sfery’ (Investment Provision of Industry Development),Finance of Ukraine, 5, 11–13.Google Scholar
  11. Kuxlenko, O., M. Denysenko and S. Revutskyi (1998) Investytsii v Ukraini: Suchasnyi Stan, Problemy, Perspektyvy Rozvytku (Investments in Ukraine:Contemporary Situation, Problems, and Perspectives for Development), Kyiv: Vakler, pp. 31–33.Google Scholar
  12. Lehmann, A. (2002) ‘The Distribution of Fixed Capital in the Multinational Firm’, IMF Staff Papers, 49(1), 136–153.Google Scholar
  13. Lukes, S. (1980) Power: A Radical View, London: Macmillan, p. 64.Google Scholar
  14. Mar_enko, A., G. Printch, N. Patika and K. Prib (1999) ‘Problema Zaluchennya Inozemnyx Investytsii v Ekonomiku Ukrainy’ (Problem of Attraction of Foreign Investment into Ukrainian Economy), Economy of Ukraine, 7, 30–8.Google Scholar
  15. Meyer, K.E. and Pind, C. (1999) ‘The Slow Growth of Foreign Direct Investment in the Soviet Union Successor States’, Economics of Transition, 7(1), 201–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moran, T. (1998) FDI and Development: The New Policy Agenda for Developing Countries and Economics in Transition. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, pp. 19–21.Google Scholar
  17. PRS Group Inc. (2001) ‘International Country Risk Guide’, available at http://www.prsgroup.com, 21(9), accessed 25 January 2002.
  18. PRS Group Inc. (2001) ‘International Country Risk Guide’, available at http://www.prsgroup.com, 24(3), accessed 21 February 2004.
  19. Rubtsova, M. (1999) Natsionalni Osoblyvosti Formuvannya Investytsiinogo Klimatu dlya Zaluchennya Inozemnogo Kapitalu v Ukrainu (National Peculiarities of Investment Climate Creation for Attraction of Foreign Capital in Ukraine).Kiev: NANU, p. 2.Google Scholar
  20. Stimson, J. (1985) ‘Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay’, American Journal of Political Science, 29, 4, 914–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tkach, T. (1999), ‘Rol Inozemnyx Investytsii v Ekonomitsi Ukrainy’ (The Role of Foreign Investments in the Ukrainian Economy), Finance of Ukraine, 9, 27–35.Google Scholar
  22. WMRC (2004j) ‘WMRC Country Report: Armenia (Country Analysis and Forecast)’, available at http://www.worldmarketanalysis.com, accessed 27 April 2004, 25.
  23. WMRC (2004 k) ‘WMRC Country Report: Uzbekistan (Country Analysis and Forecast)’, available at http://www.worldmarketanalysis.com, accessed 27 April 2004, 34.
  24. Woolfson, C. and Beck, M. (2004) ‘The End of Labour Quiescence? Undustrial Unrest in Contemporary Lithuania’, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 20(1), 227–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Nataliya Ass and Matthias Beck 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nataliya Ass
  • Matthias Beck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations