Abstract
We have presented Theorem 9.1 (neutrality) in Chapter 9 in its most concise form, which shows that under certain ideal conditions there is a scenario (no pain-no gain), where prefunding an unfunded system can be costless but such a transition is superfluous. This description may not convince everyone because it does not spell out the details and ignores other scenarios. In this Chapter I try to fill these gaps. Presentation of mathematical details will be followed by two other scenarios, double burden and voluntary joining. The three scenarios are analyzed from the cost-benefit viewpoint. We shall use the following three ideal conditions: (a) the operating costs and (b) the participation rates of the working age population are the same in both systems; (c) the efficiency of production, the growth rate of output, and the rate of interest are independent of the capital/labor ratio. The assumption of dynamic efficiency r > vg is accepted here.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 AndrĂ¡s Simonovits
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simonovits, A. (2003). Prefunding the unfunded system. In: Modeling Pension Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597693_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597693_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-1525-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59769-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)