Abstract
The issue of the uncompensated effects of one party’s actions on another is generally the source of several legal and economic problems. Historically, Pigou (1932) was among the first to address the problem, and he suggested that the damage should be assessed and paid for by the party causing such effects. Pigouvian tax in the public policy context equates the levy of tax at that level for activities such as pollution. Coase (1960), on the other hand, seeks a bargaining solution and assignment of property rights in order to solve the problem of externalities in a decentralized and efficient manner. Since Coase’s theorem has been a very important finding in the literature of economics, and since it rests on a number of explicit and implicit assumptions, it is proposed to examine almost all of the important facets of the results in this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aidt, T. (1998) Political Internalization of Economic Externalities and Environmental Policy, Journal of Public Economics, 69, pp. 1–16.
Aivazian, V. A. and Callen, J. L. (1981) The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core, Journal of Law and Economics, 24, pp. 175–81.
Allen, D. (1991) What are Transaction Costs?, pp. 1–8, in Zerbe, R. O. Jr and Goldberg V. P. (eds), Research in Law and Economics, Vol. 14 (Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Pres
Arrow, K. J. (1951) An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics, in Neyman, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press).
Ascher, W. (1999) Why Governments Waste Natural Resources: Policy Failures in Developing Countries (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Bernholz, P. (1999) The Generalized Coase Theorem and Separable Individual Preferences: An Extension, European Journal of Political Economy, 15, pp. 331–5.
Blankart, C. B. and Knieps, G. (1993) State and Standards, Public Choice, 77, pp. 39–52.
Bowles, S. (1998) Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions, Journal of Economic Literature, 36, pp. 75–111.
Calabresi, G. (1968) Transaction Costs, Resource Allocation, and Liability Rules — A Comment, Journal of Law and Economics, 11, pp. 67–90.
Coase, R. H. (1937) The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4, pp. 386–405.
Coase, R. H. (1960) The Problem of Social Cost, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, pp. 1–44.
Coase, R. H. (1988) The Firm, the Market and the Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Cooter, R. (1982) The Cost of Coase, Journal of Legal Studies, 11, pp. 1–33.
Cooter, R., Marks, S. and Mnookin, R. (1982) Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law — a Testable Model of Strategic behavior, Journal of Legal Studies, 11, pp. 225–51.
Dahlman, C. (1979) The Problem of Externalities, Journal of Law and Economics, 22, pp. 141–62.
Cooter, R. D. (1989) The Coase Theorem, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds), Allocation, Information, and Markets (London: Macmillan), pp. 64–70.
Demsetz, H. (1967) Toward a Theory of Property Rights, American Economic Review, 57, pp. 347–69.
Demsetz, H. (1996) The Core Disagreement between Pigou, the Profession, and Coase in the Analysis of the Externality Question, European Journal of Political Economy, 12, pp. 565–79.
Dixit, A. and Olson, M. (2000) Does Voluntary Participation Undermine the Coase Theorem?, Journal of Public Economics, 76, pp. 309–35.
Easterbrook, E H. and Fischel, D. R. (1991) The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Executive Order of the US President 12866, 1993, Regulatory planning and review, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 39 (Washington: USGPO), pp. 1925–1933.
Farber, D. A. (1997) Parody Lost/Pragmatism Regained — the Ironic History of the Coase Theorem, Virginia Law Review, 83, pp. 397–428.
Greenwood, P. and Ingene, C. (1978) Uncertain Externalities, Liability Rules, and Resource Allocation, American Economic Review, 68, pp. 300–32.
Hoffman, E. and Spitzer, M. L. (1982) The Coase Theorem — Some Experimental Tests, Journal of Law and Economics, 25, pp. 73–96.
Hurwicz, L. (1995) What Is the Coase Theorem?, Japan and the World Economy, 7, pp. 49–74.
Inada, K. and Kuga, K. (1973) Limitations of the ‘Coase Theorem’ on Liability Rules, Journal of Economic Theory, 6, pp. 606–13.
Johnston, J. (1993) The Influence of The Nature of the Firm on the Theory of Corporate Law, Journal of Corporate Law, 18, pp. 213–42.
Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C. (1985) Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility, American Economic Review, 75, p. 424.
Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C. (1986) Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities, Journal of Political Economy, 94, pp. 822–47.
Klausner, M. (1995) Corporations, Corporate Law, and Networks of Contracts, Virginia Law Review, 81, pp. 757–852.
Leifer, E. M. and White, H. C. (1987) A Structural Approach to Markets, in Mizruchi, M. S. and Schwartz, M. (eds), Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 85–108.
Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1992) Economics, Organization, and Management (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
Nalebuff, B. (1997) On a Clear Day, You Can See the Coase Theorem, in Dasgupta, P. and Maler, K. G. (eds), The Environment and Emerging Development Issues (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 35–47.
Olson, M. (1996) Big Bills Left on the Side Walk: Why Some Nations are Rich, and Others Poor, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, pp. 3–24.
Otani, Y. and Sicilian, J. (1977) Externalities and Problems of Nonconvexity and Overhead Costs in Welfare Economics, Journal of Economic Theory, 14, pp. 239–51.
Pigou, A. C. (1932) The Economics of Welfare, 4th edn (London: Macmillan).
Posner, R. (1993) Nobel Laureate: Ronald Coase and Methodology, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, pp. 193–9.
Rao, P. K. (2001) International Environmental Law and Economics (Oxford: Black-well).
Samuels, W. J. (1992) Essays on the Economic Role of Government (New York: New York University Press).
Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M. (1969) On the Core of an Economic System with Externalities, American Economic Review, 59, pp. 678–90.
Simpson, A. W. B. (1996) Coase v. Pigou Reexamined, Journal of Legal Studies, 25, pp. 53–101.
Starrett, D. (1972) Fundamental nonconvexities in the theory of externalities, Journal of Economic Theory, 4, pp. 180–99.
Stigler, G. (1966) The Theory of Price (New York: Macmillan).
Sunstein, C. (1999) Behavioral Law and Economics: A Progress Report, American Law and Economics Review, 1, pp. 115–57.
Thaler, R. (1991) Quasi-Rational Economics (New York: Sage).
Thaler, R. (1992) The Winner’s Curse (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Usher, D. (1998) The Coase Theorem is Tautological, Incoherent or Wrong, Economics Letters, 61, pp. 3–11.
White, B. (1987) Coase and the Courts: Economics for the Common Man, Iowa Law Review, 72, pp. 577–636.
Williamson, O. E. (2000) Ronald Harry Coase: Institutional Economist / Institution Builder, in C. Menard (ed.), Institutions, Contracts and Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 48–53.
Wolf, C. Jr (1979) A Theory of Nonmarket Failure: Framework for Implementation Analysis, Journal of Law and Economics, 22, pp. 107–39.
Zerbe, R. O. Jr and McCurdy, H. E. (1999) The Failure of Market Failure, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18, pp. 558–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Krishna Rao Pinninti
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rao, P.K. (2003). Economic Externalities. In: The Economics of Transaction Costs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597686_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597686_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42185-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59768-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)