Skip to main content

Economic Externalities

  • Chapter
  • 333 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of the uncompensated effects of one party’s actions on another is generally the source of several legal and economic problems. Historically, Pigou (1932) was among the first to address the problem, and he suggested that the damage should be assessed and paid for by the party causing such effects. Pigouvian tax in the public policy context equates the levy of tax at that level for activities such as pollution. Coase (1960), on the other hand, seeks a bargaining solution and assignment of property rights in order to solve the problem of externalities in a decentralized and efficient manner. Since Coase’s theorem has been a very important finding in the literature of economics, and since it rests on a number of explicit and implicit assumptions, it is proposed to examine almost all of the important facets of the results in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aidt, T. (1998) Political Internalization of Economic Externalities and Environmental Policy, Journal of Public Economics, 69, pp. 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aivazian, V. A. and Callen, J. L. (1981) The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core, Journal of Law and Economics, 24, pp. 175–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. (1991) What are Transaction Costs?, pp. 1–8, in Zerbe, R. O. Jr and Goldberg V. P. (eds), Research in Law and Economics, Vol. 14 (Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Pres

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951) An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics, in Neyman, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W. (1999) Why Governments Waste Natural Resources: Policy Failures in Developing Countries (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P. (1999) The Generalized Coase Theorem and Separable Individual Preferences: An Extension, European Journal of Political Economy, 15, pp. 331–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankart, C. B. and Knieps, G. (1993) State and Standards, Public Choice, 77, pp. 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. (1998) Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions, Journal of Economic Literature, 36, pp. 75–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi, G. (1968) Transaction Costs, Resource Allocation, and Liability Rules — A Comment, Journal of Law and Economics, 11, pp. 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937) The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4, pp. 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960) The Problem of Social Cost, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, pp. 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1988) The Firm, the Market and the Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. (1982) The Cost of Coase, Journal of Legal Studies, 11, pp. 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R., Marks, S. and Mnookin, R. (1982) Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law — a Testable Model of Strategic behavior, Journal of Legal Studies, 11, pp. 225–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C. (1979) The Problem of Externalities, Journal of Law and Economics, 22, pp. 141–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. D. (1989) The Coase Theorem, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds), Allocation, Information, and Markets (London: Macmillan), pp. 64–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1967) Toward a Theory of Property Rights, American Economic Review, 57, pp. 347–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1996) The Core Disagreement between Pigou, the Profession, and Coase in the Analysis of the Externality Question, European Journal of Political Economy, 12, pp. 565–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. and Olson, M. (2000) Does Voluntary Participation Undermine the Coase Theorem?, Journal of Public Economics, 76, pp. 309–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, E H. and Fischel, D. R. (1991) The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Executive Order of the US President 12866, 1993, Regulatory planning and review, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 39 (Washington: USGPO), pp. 1925–1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, D. A. (1997) Parody Lost/Pragmatism Regained — the Ironic History of the Coase Theorem, Virginia Law Review, 83, pp. 397–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. and Ingene, C. (1978) Uncertain Externalities, Liability Rules, and Resource Allocation, American Economic Review, 68, pp. 300–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E. and Spitzer, M. L. (1982) The Coase Theorem — Some Experimental Tests, Journal of Law and Economics, 25, pp. 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L. (1995) What Is the Coase Theorem?, Japan and the World Economy, 7, pp. 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inada, K. and Kuga, K. (1973) Limitations of the ‘Coase Theorem’ on Liability Rules, Journal of Economic Theory, 6, pp. 606–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (1993) The Influence of The Nature of the Firm on the Theory of Corporate Law, Journal of Corporate Law, 18, pp. 213–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C. (1985) Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility, American Economic Review, 75, p. 424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C. (1986) Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities, Journal of Political Economy, 94, pp. 822–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausner, M. (1995) Corporations, Corporate Law, and Networks of Contracts, Virginia Law Review, 81, pp. 757–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, E. M. and White, H. C. (1987) A Structural Approach to Markets, in Mizruchi, M. S. and Schwartz, M. (eds), Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1992) Economics, Organization, and Management (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalebuff, B. (1997) On a Clear Day, You Can See the Coase Theorem, in Dasgupta, P. and Maler, K. G. (eds), The Environment and Emerging Development Issues (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1996) Big Bills Left on the Side Walk: Why Some Nations are Rich, and Others Poor, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, pp. 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otani, Y. and Sicilian, J. (1977) Externalities and Problems of Nonconvexity and Overhead Costs in Welfare Economics, Journal of Economic Theory, 14, pp. 239–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1932) The Economics of Welfare, 4th edn (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. (1993) Nobel Laureate: Ronald Coase and Methodology, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, pp. 193–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. K. (2001) International Environmental Law and Economics (Oxford: Black-well).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1992) Essays on the Economic Role of Government (New York: New York University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M. (1969) On the Core of an Economic System with Externalities, American Economic Review, 59, pp. 678–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A. W. B. (1996) Coase v. Pigou Reexamined, Journal of Legal Studies, 25, pp. 53–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starrett, D. (1972) Fundamental nonconvexities in the theory of externalities, Journal of Economic Theory, 4, pp. 180–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1966) The Theory of Price (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (1999) Behavioral Law and Economics: A Progress Report, American Law and Economics Review, 1, pp. 115–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1991) Quasi-Rational Economics (New York: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1992) The Winner’s Curse (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, D. (1998) The Coase Theorem is Tautological, Incoherent or Wrong, Economics Letters, 61, pp. 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (1987) Coase and the Courts: Economics for the Common Man, Iowa Law Review, 72, pp. 577–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (2000) Ronald Harry Coase: Institutional Economist / Institution Builder, in C. Menard (ed.), Institutions, Contracts and Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, C. Jr (1979) A Theory of Nonmarket Failure: Framework for Implementation Analysis, Journal of Law and Economics, 22, pp. 107–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, R. O. Jr and McCurdy, H. E. (1999) The Failure of Market Failure, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18, pp. 558–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Krishna Rao Pinninti

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rao, P.K. (2003). Economic Externalities. In: The Economics of Transaction Costs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597686_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics