Skip to main content

Defining the Alien in The Merchant of Venice

  • Chapter
  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

On his televized journey across the Sahara (2002), Michael Palin asks a Christian missionary how many Muslims have converted to Christianity but she refuses to answer his question, telling him it doesn’t matter whether it is hundreds or just one.1 Palin touches a nerve: a dialogic history of Christian-Muslim relations, which in Shakespeare’s play The Merchant of Venice connects also with Muslim-Jewish relations and anxieties about ‘aliens’ and conversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice, ed. Jay L. Halio, The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allan Harris Cutler and Helen Elmquist Cutler, The Jew as Ally of the Muslim: Medieval Roots of Anti-Semitism (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1986), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brian Pullan, The Jews of Europe and the Inquisition of Venice1550–1670 (London and New York: I. B. Tauris Publishers, 1997), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cutler and Cutler, Jew as Ally, p. 116, cite Joshua Trachtenberg, The Devil and the Jews: the Medieval Conception of the Jew and Its Relation to Modern Anti-Semitism, 2nd edn (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1983), p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  5. All references are to H. S. D. Mithal (ed.), An Edition of Robert Wilson’s Three Ladies of London and Three Lords and Three Ladies of London, in The Renaissance Imagination Volume 6, ed. Stephen Orgel (New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christopher Marlowe, The Jew of Malta, ed. N. W. Bawcutt, The Revels Plays (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Margaret Hotine, ‘The Politics of Anti-Semitism: The Jew of Malta and The Merchant of Venice’, Notes and Queries, 38 (March 1991), pp. 35–8 (p. 37).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richard H. Popkin, ‘A Jewish Merchant of Venice’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 40 (Fall 1989), pp. 329–31 (p. 330).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lisa Jardine, Worldly Goods: a New History of the Renaissance (London and Basingstoke: Macmillan now Palgrave Macmillan, 1996), p. 374.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. H. Baker, An Introduction to English Legal History, 3rd edn (London, Boston et al.: Butterworths, 1990), p. 530.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walter Cohen, ‘The Merchant of Venice and the Possibilities of Historical Criticism’, ELH, 49 (1982), pp. 765–89 (p. 770).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ania Loomba, ‘Shakespeare and Cultural Difference’, in Alternative Shakespeares: Volume 2, ed. Terence Hawkes (London and New York: Routledge, 1996), pp. 164–91 (p. 181).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Helen Hackett, Virgin Mother, Maiden Queen: Elizabeth I and the Cult of the Virgin Mary (Basingstoke: Macmillan now Palgrave Macmillan, 1995), p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jack D’Amico, The Moor in English Renaissance Drama (Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 1991), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Rudkin, Commedia dell’arte: an Actor’s Handbook (London and New York: Routledge, 1994), p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. B. Purdom, Everyman, 4 August 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pauline Kiernan, ‘Fictional Worlds’, Globe: the Magazine of the International Shakespeare Globe Centre, 8 (Winter 1998), pp. 2–5 (p. 5).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nicolas Robins, ‘On Fighting the Audience’, Globe, 8 (1998), pp. 22–3 (p. 23).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Edward Braun, The Director and the Stage: From Naturalism to Grotowski (London: Methuen, 1982), p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Theodore Komisarjevsky, The Costume of the Theatre (London: Geoffrey Bles, 1931), pp. 113 and 162.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robert L. Erenstein, ‘Satire and the commedia dell’arte’, in Western Popular Theatre: the Proceedings of a Symposium Sponsored by the Manchester University Department of Drama, ed. David Mayer and Kenneth Richards (London and New York: Methuen, 1977), pp. 29–47 (p. 30).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robert C. Toll, On with the Show: the First Century of Show Business in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976), pp. 81 and 86.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Toll, On with the Show, p. 121. He writes: ‘Neither Bob Cole nor William Marion Cook, both classically trained musicians could freely express their talents. To earn livings they had to write caricatured sketches and “coon songs” that perpetuated negative images of Negroes.’ See also John Blair, ‘Blackface Minstrels in Cross-Cultural Perspective’, American Studies International, XXVIII:2 (October 1990), pp. 52–65,

    Google Scholar 

  24. and James H. Dormon, ‘Shaping the Popular Image of Post-Reconstruction American Blacks: the “Coon Song” Phenomenon of the Gilded Age’, American Quarterly, 40 (December 1988), pp. 450–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alex Gordon, ‘J for Jewish: From The Jazz Singer to Shoah: Louis B. Mayer to Mel Brooks’, Sight and Sound, 3 (March 1997), pp. 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  26. David Addenbrooke, The Royal Shakespeare Company: the Peter Hall Years, with a foreword by Peter Hall and afterword by Trevor Nunn (London: William Kimber, 1974), pp. 57–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. John Russell Brown, ‘Three Directors: a Review of Recent Productions’, Shakespeare Survey, 14 (1961), pp. 129–37 (p. 136).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. See Homi K. Bhaba, ‘The Other Question: Difference, Discrimination and the Discourse of Colonialism’, in Literature, Politics and Theory: Papers from the Essex Conference 1976–84, eds Francis Barker et al. (London and New York: Methuen, 1986), pp. 148–72 (p. 151).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ania Loomba and Martin Orkin (eds), Post-Colonial Shakespeares (London and New York: Routledge, 1998), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Terry Grimley, Birmingham Post (7 April 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ian McDiarmid, ‘Shylock in The Merchant of Venice’, Players of Shakespeare 2: Further Essays in Shakespearean Performance by Players with The Royal Shakespeare Company, ed. Russell Jackson and Robert Smallwood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 45–54 (p. 49).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nicholas Shrimpton, ‘Shakespeare Performances in Stratford-upon-Avon and London, 1983–4’, Shakespeare Survey, 38 (1985), pp. 201–13 (p. 209).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stanley Wells, ‘Shakespeare Performances in London and Stratford-upon-Avon, 1986–7’, Shakespeare Survey, 41 (1989), pp. 158–81 (p. 162).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gregory Doran, ‘Solanio in The Merchant of Venice’, in Players of Shakespeare 3: Further Essays in Shakespearian Performance by Players with the Royal Shakespeare Company, ed. Russell Jackson and Robert Smallwood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 68–76 (pp. 72–3).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Anita Deshmukh, Birmingham Post (27 April 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leo Salingar, ‘The Idea of Venice in Shakespeare and Jonson’, in Shakespeare’s Italy: Functions of Italian Locations in Renaissance Drama, ed. Michele Marrapodi, A. J. Hoenselaars et al. (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1993), pp. 171–84 (p. 173).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid., p. 53. Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 3rd edn (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  38. John Gross, Shylock: Four Hundred Years in the Life of a Legend (1992; London: Vintage, 1994), p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Donald Spoto, Laurence Olivier: a Biography (London: Harper Collins, 1991), p. 302.

    Google Scholar 

  40. James C. Bulman, Shakespeare in Performance: The Merchant of Venice (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1991), p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Anthony Bloomfield and Philip French (producers), The Arts This Week (BBC radio transcript; PLN17/TK1104; transmission 30 April 1970). The British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Herbert Kretzmer, Daily Express (29 April 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Royal Shakespeare Company Production Pack, The Merchant of Venice (RSC Education, 1993), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Peter Holland, ‘Shakespeare Performances in England, 1992–1993’, Shakespeare Survey, 47 (1994), pp. 181–207 (p. 197).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Alan C. Dessen, ‘The Image and the Script: Shakespeare on Stage in 1993’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 12:1 (Winter 1994), pp. 5–8 (p. 6).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Maria Jones

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, M. (2003). Defining the Alien in The Merchant of Venice. In: Shakespeare’s Culture in Modern Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597167_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics