Abstract
It is argued in this chapter that the main overall subject of Volume III of Capital is the distribution of surplus-value, i.e., the division of the total amount of surplus-value into individual component parts, first into equal rates of profit across branches of production and then the further division of surplus-value into commercial profit, interest and rent. This subject of Volume III is clearly stated in the following passage from the introduction of Part Seven of Volume I, which provides an succinct overview of the three volumes of Capital:
The capitalist who produces surplus-value, i.e. who extracts unpaid labor directly from the workers and fixes it in commodities, is admittedly the first appropriator of this surplus-value, but he is by no means its ultimate proprietor. He has to share it afterwards with capitalists who fulfil other functions in social production taken as a whole, with the owner of land, and with yet other people. Surplusvalue is therefore split up into various parts. Its fragments fall to various categories of person, and take on various mutually independent forms, such as profit, interest, gains made through trade, ground rent, etc. We shall be able to deal with these modified forms of surplus-value only in Volume 3.
Karl Marx, 1867 (1977): 709
‘Capitalists are like hostile brothers who divide among themselves the loot of other people’s labour.’
Karl Marx, Theories of Surplus-Value, Vol. II: 29
* I would like to thank my colleagues and co-authors in this book for their many helpful comments on my chapter, both at our Amsterdam conference and in subsequent correspondence, especially Chris Arthur and Geert Reuten who disagree with me the most.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Arthur, Christopher J. (2001), Capital in General and Marx’s Capital (this volume).
Bellofiore, Riccardo (ed.) (1998), Marxian Economics: A Reappraisal, 2 volumes (London/New York: Macmillan/St Martin’s Press).
— (2001), ‘Transformation’ and the Monetary Circuit (this volume).
Dussel, Enrique (2001), Toward an Unknown Marx: A Commentary on the Manuscripts of 1861–63 (LondonL Routledge).
Foley, Duncan (1986), Understanding Capital: Marx’s Economic Theory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Heinrich, Michael (1996–97) Engels’s Edition of the Third Volume of Capital and Marx’s Original Manuscript, Science and Society, 60/4: 452–66.
Mandel, Ernst (1981), Introduction to Volume III of Capital (New York: Random House).
Marx, Karl (1857–58), Grundrisse (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973).
— (1861–63a), Theories of Surplus Value, Vol. II (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1968).
— (1861–63b), Theories of Surplus Value, Vol. III (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1971).
— (1867), Capital, Vol. I (New York: Random House, 1977).
— (1894), Capital, Vol. III (New York: Random House, 1981).
Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick (1975), Selected Correspondence (Moscow: Progress Publishers).
— (1861–63c), Collected Works, Vol. 33 (New York: International Publishers, 1991).
— (1868–70), Collected Works, Vol. 43 (New York: International Publishers, 1988).
Mattick, Paul, Sr (1969), Marx and Keynes: the limits of the mixed economy (Boston: Porter Sargent).
Moseley, Fred (1993), Marx’s Logical Method and the ‘Transformation Problem’, in Moseley (ed.), Marx’s Method in ‘Capital’: A Reexamination (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).
— (1997), The development of Marx’s theory of the distribution of surplus-value, in F. Moseley and M. Campbell (eds), New Investigations of Marx’s Method (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).
— (2000), The ‘New Solution’ to the transformation problem: a sympathetic critique, Review of Radical Political Economics 32(2): 282–316.
Murray, Patrick (2001), The Illusion of the Economic. The Trinity Formula and the ‘religion of everyday life’ (this volume).
Rosdolsky, Roman (1968), The Making of Marx’s ‘Capital’ (London: Pluto Press, 1977).
Schefold, Bertram (1998), The Relationship between the Rate of Profit and the Rate of Interest: A Reassessment after the Publication of Marx’s Manuscript of the Third Volume of Das Kapital, in Bellofiore (ed. 1998, vol. 1): 127–43.
Smith, Tony (2001), Surplus Profits from Innovation. A missing level in Capital III? (this volume).
Sweezy, Paul (1942), The Theory of Capitalist Development (New York: Monthly Review Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moseley, F. (2002). Hostile Brothers. In: Campbell, M., Reuten, G. (eds) The Culmination of Capital. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597099_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597099_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42813-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59709-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)