Abstract
In the last eight chapters, I have made the case for ethical intuitionism by rebutting the alternative theories and then responding to all the major objections to intuitionism. In essence, I have argued:
-
1.
There are five broad views about the nature of morality: non-cognitivism, subjectivism, naturalism, nihilism, and intuitionism.
-
2.
Non-cognitivism, subjectivism, naturalism, and nihilism all face grave difficulties.
-
3.
Intuitionism faces no serious problems.
-
4.
Therefore, intuitionism is probably the correct view.
But the arguments establishing points (2) and (3) have been long and complex. In this chapter, I provide a brief review of the most important arguments for these theses. I then discuss why intuitionism has been unpopular, and why the issue is important. I conclude with some remarks about how I became an intuitionist.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2005 Michael Huemer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huemer, M. (2005). Conclusion. In: Ethical Intuitionism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597051_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597051_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-57374-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59705-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)