Skip to main content
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

The apparent inability of liberal government to foster the arts was, to Coleridge, particularly grating in Britain since it prided itself on the ancient personal freedoms preserved in the constitution. But that is not to say that ‘despotism’ was any sort of solution. Coleridge’s point is that the liberal market economy deals only in monetary value and so cannot take into its calculations the worth of aesthetic artefacts – with predictably disastrous consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2002 Michael John Kooy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kooy, M.J. (2002). Coleridge’s ‘ Aesthetic State’. In: Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596788_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics