Abstract
Identifying the’ security dilemma’ as a core problem of East-West tensions in the 1980s, defensive proponents argued that it could be resolved if both sides adopted manifestly defensive military doctrines. This line of argument ran counter to the official Western view that, given the Soviet threat, Western security depended on maintaining or increasing NATO’s military strength as a clear signal of resolve to the Soviet Union, and that this sometimes meant acquiring offensive capabilities.1 This chapter explores how defensive theorists have defined and used the security dilemma concept and identifies major defensive-concept problems that lie at the heart of security dilemma theorising, including those that have arisen in the post-Cold War environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
The term ‘negotiation through strength’ is used to describe this general approach. See Coral Bell, Negotiation from Strength: A Study in the Politics of Power, London: Chatto & Windus, 1962.
John Herz, ‘Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, vol.2, no.2 (1950), p. 157.
John Herz, Political Realism and Political Idealism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951, esp. pp. 14–16.
John Herz, International Politics in the Atomic Age (1959), reprint, New York: Columbia University Press, 1970, p. 242.
Robert Jervis, ‘Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, vol.30, no.2 (January 1978), p. 169.
Nicholas J. Wheeler and Ken Booth, ‘The Security Dilemma’, in John Baylis and N.J. Rengger, Dilemmas of World Politics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, p.30.
Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams, ‘Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods’, Mershon International Studies Review, vol.40, supplement 2 (October 1996), p.239.
Peter Katzenstein, The Culture of National Security, New York: Columbia University Press, 1996, p.5
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, in Peter J. Katzenstein, Robert O. Keohane and Stephen D. Krasner (eds), Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999, esp. pp. 264–5.
David Campbell, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (revised edn), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
Mary Kaldor, The Imaginary War: Understanding the East-West Conflict, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.
Frank Ninkovich, ‘No Post-Mortems for Postmodernism, Please’, Diplomatic History, vol.22, no.3 (Summer 1998), p.456.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Geoffrey Wiseman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wiseman, G. (2002). Defensive Concepts and the Security Dilemma. In: Concepts of Non-Provocative Defence. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596375_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596375_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41878-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59637-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)