Skip to main content

Value at Risk: Does it Work in Emerging Markets?

  • Chapter
Risk Management in Emerging Markets

Part of the book series: Centre for the Study of Emerging Markets Series ((CSEM))

  • 172 Accesses

Abstract

Estimating and controlling risks has become a vital topic in financial institutions (Bouchaud, 2000; Mulvey et al., 1996). All financial intermediaries (FIs) entail the assumption, management and pricing of risk (Cornett and Saunders, 1999). Risk facing financial intermediations, in this broader sense, encompasses credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, gearing risk, solvency risk, operational risk and sovereign risk (Bessis, 2001; Santemero and Babbel, 1996; Sinkey, 2002; Thygerson, 1995). Among these different risk issues and categories, market risk is a central risk faced by financial institutions (Bessis, 2001; Cornett and Saunders, 1999; Heffernan, 1996; Santomero, 1997), and there are a number of models that are currently employed by various financial institutions to measure it; Table 8.1 gives a brief outline of the measurement of market risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allport, G.N. (2000) ‘Managing Risk Organization-Wide’, CA Magazine, vol. 133 (7), pp. 37–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS) (2001) A Survey of Stress Tests and Current Practices at Major Financial Institutions, Report by a Task Force established by the Committee on Global Financial Systems of the Central Banks of the Group of Ten countries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of International Settlement (1996) Supervising Global Financial Markets May 1996: Submission to the G-7 Lyon Summit of June 1996 (Basle: BIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Basle Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) (1994) Risk Management Guidelines for Derivatives (Basle: BIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beder, T.S. (1995) ‘VaR: Seductive but Dangerous’, Financial Analysts Journal (September–October), pp. 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, J. and O’Brien, J. (2002) ‘How Accurate are Value-at-Risk Models at Commercial Banks?’ The Journal of Finance, vol. LVII (3), pp. 1093–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessis, J. (2001) Risk Management in Banking, 2nd edn (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchaud, J.P. (2000) ‘Elements for a Theory of Financial Risks’, Physica A., vol. 285, pp. 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudoukh, J., Richardson, M. and Whitelaw, R. (1998) ‘The Best of Both Worlds: A Hybrid Approach to Calculating Value at Risk’, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (May), pp. 64–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulter, C. (1999) Mastering Value at Risk: A Step-by-step Guide to Understanding and Applying VaR (London: Financial Times and Pitman Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Capital Markets Risk Advisers (CMRA) (1996) ‘Risk Standards Overview’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, D. (1996) Managing Derivative Risks: The Use and Abuse of Leverage (Chichester: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, P., Hahn, J. and Inoue, A. (2001) ‘Testing and Comparing Valueat- Risk Measures’, Journal of Empirical Finance, vol. 8, pp. 325–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornett, M.M. and Saunders, A. (1999) Fundamentals of Financial Institutions Management (Singapore: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Culp, C., Miller, M.H. and Neves, A.M.P. (1997) ‘Value-at-Risk: Uses and Abuses’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, vol. 10 (Winter), pp. 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbertson, K. and Nitzsche, D. (2001) Financial Engineering: Derivatives and Risk Management (West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P.R. and Giglierano, J.J. (1986) ‘Missing the Boat and Sinking the Boat: A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurial Risk’, Journal of Marketing, vol. 50(3), pp. 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, K. (1998) Beyond Value at Risk: The New Science of Risk Management (West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, K. (2002 ) An Introduction to Market Risk Measurement (West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J. and Gizycki, M. (1999) ‘Conservatism, Accuracy and Efficiency: Comparing Value-at-Risk Models’, Working Paper, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.F. and Manganelli, S. (1999) ‘CAViaR: Conditional Value at Risk By Quantile Regression’, National Bureau of Economic ResearchWorking Paper, Cambridge, no. 7341.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, G.A. and Takane, Y. (1989) Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education, 6th edn (London: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hague, P. (1993) Questionnaire Design (London: Kogan Page).

    Google Scholar 

  • Härdle, W., Kleinow, T. and Stahl, G. (2002) ‘Applied Quantitative Finance. Theory and Computational Tools’, Working Paper, All butValue-at-RiskWebsite (online), available from: http://www.gloriamundi.org (Accessed 8 March 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernn, S. (1996) Modern Banking in Theory and Practice (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Morgan/Reuters (1995) RiskMetrics – Technical Document, 3rd edn (New York: Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2001) Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, 2nd edn (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubsch, A.J. (1999) Risk Management – A Practical Guide, 1st edn (New York: Risk Metrics Group).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. and Siegel, M. (1996) ‘Value at Risk: Implementing a Risk Measurement Standard’, Working Paper of the Wharton Financial Institutions Centre, The Warton School, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, J.M., Rosenbaum, D.P. and Shetty, B. (1996) ‘Strategic Financial Risk Management and Operations Research’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 97, pp. 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prisker, M. (1995) ‘Evaluating Value at Risk Methodologies: Accuracy Versus Computational Time’, Working Paper of the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santomero, A.M. (1997) ‘Commercial Bank Risk Management: An Analysis of the Process’, Journal of Financial Services Research, vol. 12(2/3), pp. 83–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santomero, A.M. and Babbel, D. (1996) Financial Markets, Instruments and Institutions (Illinois: Irwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma, M. (2001) ‘Testing EVT-based VaR Measures’, Working Paper, Indira Ghandi Institute for Development Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2003) Research Methods for Business Students, 3rd edn (Essex: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. and Castellan, J.R. (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences (London: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkey, J.F. (2002) Commercial Bank Financial Management – in the Financial- Service Industry, 6th ed. (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh, F. (1996) ‘Risk and Value at Risk’, European Management Journal, vol. 14(6), pp. 612–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, Alexander & Co. (1991) ‘Global Risk Financing & Insurance Survey’, Alexander Stenhouse & Co Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thygerson, K. (1995) Management of Financial Institutions (New York: Harper Collins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, A. and Glendon, A.L. (1998) Managing Risk (London: International Thomson Business Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, M.C.S., Cheng, W.Y. andWong, C.Y.P. (2002) ‘Market Risk Management of Banks: Implications from the Accuracy of Value-at-Risk Forecasts’, Journal of Forecasting (January).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zecker, P.D. and Putnam, B.H. (2002) ‘A Short Note on the Forecasts Concept of Risk Management and VaR for Asset Management Firms’, Investor Analytics Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Sima Motamen-Samadian

Copyright information

© 2005 Chuntao Yu, Bob Davidson and Mohamed Nurullah

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yu, C., Davidson, B., Nurullah, M. (2005). Value at Risk: Does it Work in Emerging Markets?. In: Motamen-Samadian, S. (eds) Risk Management in Emerging Markets. Centre for the Study of Emerging Markets Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596368_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics