Skip to main content

Rawls and Hegel: The Reasonable and the Rational in Theory and Practice

  • Chapter
Hegel and the History of Political Philosophy

Abstract

Rawls’s A Theory of Justice, on its publication in 1971, was interpreted as being starkly opposed to Hegel and the Hegelian tradition.1 The work generated a wealth of critical commentary, including an Hegelianised communitarian critique of its supposedly individualistic and non-historical methodological and ontological assumptions.2 The assimilation of Hegel to an anti-Rawlsian communitarian standpoint was afforded by Hegel’s consistent and trenchant critique of contractualist political theories, from his early critique of natural law theory to his mature political philosophy.3 Communitarians, as Gutmann notes, drew upon an Hegelian conception of man as an historical social being, in condemning what they designated a Rawlsian image of man as a rational individual, lacking defining social ties.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See the critical articles T. Nagel, ‘Rawls on Justice’, and M. Fisk, ‘History and Reason in Rawls’ Moral Theory’, in N. Daniels (ed.), Reading Rawls ( Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See M. Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), and the following key works by A. Macintyre: After Virtue (London: Duckworth, 1981 ); Whose Justice? Which Rationality? ( Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See B. Haddock, ‘Hegel’s Critique of the Theory of Social Contract’, in D. Boucher and P. Kelly (eds), The Social Contract From Hobbes To Rawls ( London and New York: Routledge, 1994 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Gutmann, ‘Communitarian Critics of Liberalism’, in S. Avineri and A. de-Shalit (eds), Communitarianism and Individualism ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992 ), pp. 120–1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See S. Schwarzenbach, ‘Rawls, Hegel and Communitarianism’, Political Theory, vol. 19, no. 4 (Nov. 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Benson, ‘Rawls, Hegel and Personhood’, Political Theory, vol. 22, no. 3 (Aug. 1992);

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Schwarzenbach, A Rejoinder to Peter Benson’, Political Theory, vol. 22, no. 3 (August 1922).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See J. Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York and Chicester: Columbia University Press, 1996, paperback edition), esp. pp. xxvi, 285–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See also C. Kukathas and P. Pettit, Rawls - A Theory of Justice and its Critics (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990), esp. pp. 144–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Rawls, ‘Reply to Habermas’, in Political Liberalism, op. cit., p. 395. ‘Reply to Habermas’ first appeared in The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92, no. 3 (March 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971 ), pp. 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Mulhall and A. Swift, Liberals and Communitarians ( Oxford: Blackwell, 1996 ), pp. 231–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Bellamy and D. Castiglione, ‘Constitutionalism and Democracy - Political Theory and the American Constitution’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 27 (1997), p. 598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Caney, Anti-perfectionism and Rawlsian Liberalism’, Political Studies, vol. 43, no. 2, June 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Bellamy and D. Castiglione, ‘Constitutionalism and Democracy - Political Theory and the American Constitution’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 27 (1997), p. 604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. VPG: Werke 12; G. W. E Hegel, The Philosophy of History (New York: Dover Press, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Rawls, ‘The Law of Peoples’, in S. Shute and S. Hurley (eds), On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures, 1993 ( New York: HarperCollins, 1993 ), pp. 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Gary K. Browning

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Browning, G.K. (1999). Rawls and Hegel: The Reasonable and the Rational in Theory and Practice. In: Hegel and the History of Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596139_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics