Skip to main content

Magic and History

  • Chapter
  • 67 Accesses

Abstract

We now consider the interrelationships of script, performance, text and interpretation in the particular example of A Midsummer Night’s Dream. I begin with a debate between criticism and performance as modes of interpretation, and go on to consider the play as a historical subtext for several other kinds of performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. I quote from Sir Thomas North’s Elizabethan translation, which Shakespeare used. Cited in Harold F. Brooks’ Arden A Midsummer Night’s Dream (London: Methuen, 1979), p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.g., Stephen Gossen, The Schoole of Abuse (1579), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. K. Chambers, William Shakespeare (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930), 1:362.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a discussion of James’s attacks on women as an index both to his relations with his mother and his sense of himself, see Jonathan Goldberg, James I and the Politics of Literature (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983), pp. 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The most detailed consideration of James’s homoerotic liaisons is David M. Bergeron’s King James and Letters of Homoerotic Desire (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1999). See also my book Impersonations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cited in G. P. Akrigg, Jacobean Pageant (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. From a letter of 5 October 1612, quoted by J. W. Williamson, The Myth of the Conqueror (New York: AMS Press, 1978), pp. 138–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Stephen Orgel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Orgel, S. (2003). Magic and History. In: Imagining Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596108_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics