Abstract
In summary thus far, the purpose of this book has been to analyse more systematically the phenomenon of political leadership during the peace process in Northern Ireland using three interconnected foci — that of the role, capacity and effect of political leadership. Beginning at a very general level, it has sought to both explain and define the nature of political leadership during the period between 1994 and 1998 in Northern Ireland, as perceived by both the political leaders themselves and also those commentators and analysts following the peace process. While some of the definitions discussed in Chapter 3 were revealing, it was clear that a more robust definition was needed which could put clear water between the more general concepts of political leadership, as articulated in Chapter 2, and those which were more specific to the context of a conflicted society. Hence, political leadership as a concept, in the context of the Northern Ireland peace process, was deconstructed into its constituent parts of role, capacity and effect for further examination. Collectively, these chapters on role, capacity and effect have illustrated some of the difficulties in grasping the various contours of political leadership in the context of a peace process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Joseph C. Rost, Leadership, Leaders, and Sin, Selected Proceedings: 1998 Annual Meeting: Leaders/Scholars Association (Maryland: Center for the Advanced Study of Leadership and the James MacGregor Burns Academy of Leadership, University of Maryland, 1999) p. 66.
The term ‘dirty hands’ has been taken from Daniel R. Sabia Jr, ‘Weber’s political ethics and the problem of dirty hands’, Journal of Management History, 2, 1 (1996) pp. 6–20.
See Gerry Adams, Hope and History: Making Peace in Ireland (Kerry: Brandon, 2004) p. 332.
John Darby and Roger MacGinty, ‘Imperfect Peace: The Aftermath of Northern Ireland’s Peace Accord’, Ethnic Studies Report, 17, 2 (1999) pp. 201–225.
According to Godson, Trimble met Wright twice: ‘... once in a room in the church hall and once in the vicinity of the digger [at Drumcree church]’. Dean Godson, Himself Alone: David Trimble and the Ordeal of Unionism (London: HarperCollins, 2004) p. 235.
Henry McDonald, Trimble (London: Bloomsbury, 2000) pp. 189–190.
Padraig O’Malley, ‘Northern Ireland and South Africa: Hope and History at a Crossroads’, in John McGarry, ed., Northern Ireland and the Divided World: Post-Agreement Northern Ireland in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001) p. 287.
Fionnuala O’Connor, Breaking the Bonds (Edinburgh: Mainstream, 2002) p. 71.
John Darby and Roger MacGinty, ‘Conclusions: Peace Processes, Present and Future’, in John Darby and Roger MacGinty, eds, Contemporary Peacemaking (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003) p. 267.
Paul Dixon, ‘Political Skills or Lying and Manipulation? The Choreography of the Northern Ireland Peace process’, Political Studies, 50, 4 (2002) pp. 725–741.
John McGarry, ‘Political Settlements in Northern Ireland and South Africa’, Political Studies, 45, 5 (1998) p. 854.
John Hume, Personal Views: Politics, Peace and Reconciliation in Ireland (Dublin: Town House, 1996) pp. 95–96.
Adrian Guelke, ‘Comparatively Peaceful: The Role of Analogy in Northern Ireland’s Peace Process’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, XI, 1 (1997) p. 37.
James Prior, A Balance of Power (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1986) p. 52.
Paul Arthur, Special Relationships: Britain, Ireland and the Northern Ireland Problem (Belfast: Blackstaff, 2000) p. 180.
John Paul Lederach, Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies (Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1997) pp. 45–46.
John Paul Lederach, ‘Cultivating Peace: a practitioner’s view of deadly conflict and negotiation’, in John Darby and Roger MacGinty, eds, Contemporary Peacemaking (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003) p. 35.
Henry Sinnerton, David Ervine: Uncharted Waters (Kerry: Brandon, 2002) pp. 136–140.
Adrian Guelke, ‘Negotiations and Peace Processes’, in John Darby and Roger MacGinty, eds, Contemporary Peacemaking (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003) p. 53.
Robert L. Rothstein, “Tn Fear of Peace: Getting Past May be”, in Robert L. Rothstein, ed., After the Peace: Resistance and Reconciliation (London: Lynne Rienner, 1999).
Hugh Miall, Oliver Ramsbotham and Tom Woodhouse, Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts (Oxford: Polity, 1999).
See Robert J. House and Ram N. Aditya, ‘The Social Scientific Study of Leadership’: Quo Vadis?’, Journal of Management, 23, 3 (1997) p. 455.
Copyright information
© 2007 Cathy Gormley-Heenan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gormley-Heenan, C. (2007). The Limitations of Role, Capacity and Effect. In: Political Leadership and the Northern Ireland Peace Process. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596085_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596085_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35251-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59608-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)