Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St Antony’s Series ((STANTS))

  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

An anecdote is often told of a group of political leaders from Northern Ireland, standing together in a conference room in South Africa. A smaller number of these leaders are huddled together, making polite small talk as they wait for their hosts to arrive. They stand beneath a ceiling fan which has seen better days. It seems loose, as if it is ready to fall. Rather worriedly, one leader comments that it might fall down and hit them. Another responds: ‘You’re right — and this could be the first time that the fan hits the shit’!1 This anecdote is revealing in many ways. First, there is the tacit acknowledgment that political leaders in Northern Ireland did come together during the peace process, albeit outside of the parameters of Northern Ireland. Secondly, that in doing so they were then able to discuss matters completely unrelated to broader political events in Northern Ireland. Thirdly, that some of them showed a self-deprecating humour and others appreciated the humour enough to carry the story back to Northern Ireland and this is evidence of a trait which might ultimately help the peace process in its darker periods.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The exception to this was discreet contact that had been established between the politicians such as Billy Hutchinson from the PUP and republicans, often through their work on community groups. See David McKittrick and David McVea, Making Sense of the Troubles (Belfast: Blackstaff, 2000) p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams recall of their first meetings with the SDLP in 1989 that: ‘apart from John Hume, they were hostile, confrontational, on occasion arrogant... right up to the end of the discussions, Seamus Mallon, Austin Currie and Sean Farren lectured and hectored us’. See Gerry Adams, Hope and History: Making Peace in Ireland (Kerry: Brandon, 2004) pp. 78–79

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gerard Murray, John Hume and the SDLP: Impact and Survival in Northern Ireland (Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. David Bloomfield, Political Dialogue in Northern Ireland: The Brooke Initiative, 1989–92 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998) pp. 3–4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. For a full narrative of the difficulties faced by the Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition during both the Forum debates and the talks process. See Kate Fearon, Women’s Work: The Story of the Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition (Belfast: Blackstaff, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Janice Gross Stein, ‘Getting to the table: The Triggers, Stages, Functions, and Consequences of Prenegotiation’, International Journal, XLIV (1989) p. 475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paul Arthur, ‘Multiparty Mediation in Northern Ireland’, in Chester A. Crocker, Fen Olsen Hampson and Pamela Aall, eds, Herding Cats: Multi party Mediation in a Complex World (Washington DC; Great Britain: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1999) p. 495.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Helen Brocklehurst, Noel Stott, Brandon Hamber and Gillian Robinson, ‘Lesson Drawing: Northern Ireland and South Africa’, Indicator SA, 18, 1 (2001) pp. 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Paul Arthur, ‘Some Thoughts on Transition: A Comparative View on the Peace Process in South Africa and Northern Ireland’, Government and Opposition, 30, 1 (1995) pp. 48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eric A. Nordlinger, Conflict Regulation in Divided Societies (Harvard: Center for International Affairs — Harvard University, 1972) pp. 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dean Godson makes this comment about David Trimble with particular reference to his decision to fulfil a speaking engagement at the University of Chicago in the US at a critical point in the peace process — the period between when the Agreement was signed in April 1998 and the ensuing referendum in May 1998. See Dean Godson, Himself Alone: David Trimble and the Ordeal of Unionism (London: HarperCollins, 2004) p. 363.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ronald J. Fisher, ‘Prenegotiation Problem-Solving Discussions: Enhancing the Potential for Successful Negotiations’, International Journal, XLIV, 2 (1989) p. 472.

    Google Scholar 

  13. As cited in Henry Sinnerton, David Ervine: Uncharted Waters (Kerry: Brandon, 2002) p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Padraig O’Malley, ‘Northern Ireland and South Africa: Hope and History at a Crossroads’, in McGarry, J., ed., Northern Ireland in the Divided World: Post-Agreement Northern Ireland in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001) p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Cathy Gormley-Heenan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gormley-Heenan, C. (2007). The Effect of Political Leaders on Other Political Leaders. In: Political Leadership and the Northern Ireland Peace Process. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596085_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics