Mansfield Park — What did Jane Austen Really Write? The Texts of 1814 and 1816

  • Brian Southam

Abstract

Questions of textual transmission and textual authority have not hitherto arisen with Austen partly because the published texts are relatively problem-free and partly because the evidence is so thin. Apart from a single fragment, the two so-called ‘cancelled’ chapters of Persuasion, an earlier version of the novel’s ending, nothing of the manuscripts of the six novels has survived. However, the publication of the Penguin and Norton editions ofMansfield Park directs our attention to an area of uncertainty between the published texts and what Austen actually wrote. Mansfield Park has an important place in this enquiry as one of the only two novels — the other is Sense and Sensibility — that was revised and corrected by Austen for a second edition; and it is in their differing choice of copy-text that Kathryn Sutherland and Claudia Johnson have raised the question posed in the title of this essay; and, alongside it, and equally important, the question of textual authority as between the first edition, published by Thomas Egerton in 1814, and the second edition, published by John Murray in 1816.

Keywords

Income Expense Editing Stake Emend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jane Austen’s Letters, ed. Deirdre Le Faye (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, 3rd edn, 1997), p. 305.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jane Austen, Mansfield Park, ed. R. W. Chapman, reprinted in The Novels of Jane Austen, 5 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1923, etc.), III, pp. xi—xii.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. W. Chapman, Jane Austen: Facts and Problems (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1948), p. 155.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jane Austen, Mansfield Park, ed. Claudia L. Johnson (New York and London: W.W. Norton and Co., 1998), pp. xx-xxi.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jane Austen, Mansfield Park, ed. Kathryn Sutherland (London: Penguin, 1996), p. xxxiv.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Kathryn Sutherland, ‘Speaking Commas/Reading Commas: Punctuating Mansfield Park’, Text, 12 (1999), 101–22;Google Scholar
  7. Kathryn Sutherland, Ma®king the Text: The Presentation of Meaning on the Literary Page, ed. Joe Bray, Miriam Handley and Anne C. Henry (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000), pp. 217–34.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    John Smith], The Printer’s Grammar (London: for T. Evans, 1787), p. 60.Google Scholar
  9. T. F. Dibdin, The Bibliographical Decameron, London, 1817, ii, p. 406).Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    Letter dated 9 February 1805, in The London Compositor: Documents relating to Wages, Working Conditions and Customs of the London Printing Trade 1785–1900, ed. Ellic Howe (London: Oxford University Press, 1947), p. 86.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Charles Stower, The Printer’s Grammar (London: B. Crosby, 1808), p. 391.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    Ronald B. McKerrow, An Introduction to Bibliography for Literary Students (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927, 1928), p. 250.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    Jan Fergus, Jane Austen: A Literary Life (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991), ch. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 19.
    Susan. A Novel in Two Volumes’ (see Brian Southam, Jane Austen’s Literary Manuscripts [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964;Google Scholar
  15. 20.
    R. W. Chapman, Two Chapters of Persuasion (Oxford, 1926), pp. 38–9,Google Scholar
  16. 22.
    Caleb Stower, The Printer’s Price-Book (London: C. Cradock, 1814), pp. 8, 11.Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Donald H. Reiman, Romantic Texts and Contexts (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1987), p. 37.Google Scholar
  18. 26.
    Jane Austen, Lady Susan. ed. R. W. Chapman (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925), p. 64, p. 124.Google Scholar
  19. Philip Gaskell, From Writer to Reader: Studies in Editorial Method (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978, reprinted 1999), p. 6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Brian Southam 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Southam

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations