Skip to main content

Why Do Firms Not Collaborate? The Role of Competencies and Technological Regimes

  • Chapter
Innovation and Firm Performance

Abstract

Determinants and effects of innovation are topics of intense research interest, particularly since the fundamental relationship between economic and technological change has become acknowledged more widely. As a result, the contributions of research and development activities (R&D) to innovation and industrial evolution, especially in the manufacturing industries are well appreciated. However, in economic models, as well as in many empirical studies, R&D is often conceptualized as an innovation production function. Such treatment may be a useful first approximation of the innovation process within a linear model of innovation. However, in qualitative empirical studies since the 1980s it has been observed that the organization of R&D is a critical determinant of both innovation (for example, Mowery, 1983) and economic performance (for example, Teece, 1986). Informal models of innovation emphasize feedbacks and complementarities among a firm’s activities and knowledge bases (Kline and Rosenberg, 1986; Rothwell, 1994). Organizational choices, for instance, whether to organize knowledge-creation activities internally or outsource them, have a considerable impact on the strength of the interactions among the necessary sources of knowledge.

I am grateful for the comments by the participants of the TSER Workshop on Innovation and Economic Change at Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands, especially Pierre Mohnen, Chris Walters, and Jose M. Labeaga, and comments by seminar participants at INRA, Toulouse and Amos Tuck School, Dartmouth College. Steven Wolf provided valuable editing assistance Remaining errors are mine alone. This research was funded by TEKES, the National Technology Agency of Finland. Statistics Finland compiled the data. I thank both for their support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ARVANITIS, S. (1999) Generierung von neuem technischem Wissen, Produktivität und Arbeits qualifikation in der schweizerischen Industrie: Eine Querschnitts analyse auf der Basis von Unternehmensdaten, Unpublished dissertation, University of Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARVANITIS, S. and HOLLENSTEIN, H. (1996) ‘Industrial Innovation in Switzerland: A Model-based Analysis with Survey Data’, in A. Kleinknecht (ed.), Determinants of Innovation. The Message from New Indicators, London: Macmillan, pp. 13–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARVANITIS, S. and HOLLENSTEIN, H. (1998) ‘Firm Performance, Innovation and Technological Spillovers: A Cross-section Analysis with Swiss Firm Data’, in G. Eliasson, ? Green and C. R. McCann (eds), Microfoundations of Economic Growth. A Schumpeterian Perspective, Ann Harbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press; pp. 271–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARVANITIS, S., FRICK, A., ETTER, R. and HOLLENSTEIN, H. (1992) Innovationsfähigkeit und Innovationsverhalten der Schweizer Industrie, Berne: Bundesamt fiir Konjunkturfragen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARVANITIS, D. B. and HELPMAN, E. (1995) ‘International R&D Spillovers’, European Economic Review, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 859–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, W. M. (1995) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity’, in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 182–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, W. M. and LEVINTHAL, D. A. (1989) ‘Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D’, Economic Journal, vol. 99, no. 398, pp. 569–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENGLANDER, A. S., EVENSON, R. and HANAZAKI, M. (1988) ‘R&D, Innovation and Total Factor Productivity’, OECD Economic Studies, no. 11, pp. 156–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEROSKI, P. A. (1995) ‘Do Spillovers Undermine the Incentive to Innovate?’, in S. Dowrick (ed.), Economic Approaches to Innovation, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 76–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOTO, A. and SUZUKI, K. (1989) ‘R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 555–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRILICHES, Z. (1979) ‘Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRILICHES, Z. (1992) ‘The Search for R&D Spillovers’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 94 (Suppl.), pp. 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • HALL, B. H., GRILICHES, Z. and HAUSMAN, J. A. (1986) ‘Patents and R and D: Is there a Lag?’ International Economic Review, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 265–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HALL, B. H. and MAIRESSE, J. (1995) ‘Exploring the Relationship between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 65, no. 1, 263–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARHOFF, D. (1994) ‘Searching for R&D Spillovers among German Manufacturing Firms’, Paper Prepared for the ZEW Workshop on Productivity, R&D and Innovation at the Firm Level, Mannheim, Germany, June 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARHOFF, D. (1998) ‘R&D and Productivity in German Manufacturing Firms’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JAFFE, A. B. (1986) ‘Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value’, American Economic Review, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVIN, R. ? and REISS, P. ? (1988) ‘Cost-reducing and Demand-creating R&D with Spillovers’, Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 538–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MANSFIELD, E. (1985) ‘How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?’, Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 34, pp. 217–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOHNEN, P. (1992) The Relationship between R&D and Productivity Growth in Canada and Other Major Industrialized Countries, Ottawa: Canada Communications Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1993) Basic Science and Technology Statistics, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1995) Research and Development Expenditure in Industry, 1973–92, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAKES, A. and SCHANKERMAN, M. (1984) ‘The Rate of Obsolescence of Patents, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources’, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, Chicago, 111.: University of Chicago Press, pp. 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROGERS, M. (1995) ‘International Knowledge Spillovers: A Cross-Country Study’, in S. Dowrick (ed.), Economic Approaches to Innovation, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 166–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHANKERMAN, M. (1981) ‘The Effects of Double-Counting and Expensing on the Measured Returns to R&D’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 454–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPENCE, M. (1984) ‘Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance’, Econometrica, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 101–21. Swiss Federal Statistics Office (1993) Swiss R&D Statistics, 1992, Berne: Federal Statistics Office. Swiss Federal Statistics Office (1994) Foreign Trade Statistics, 1994, Berne: Federal Statistics Office.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TERLEKYJ, N. (1980) ‘Direct and Indirect Effects of Industrial Research and Development on the Productivity Growth of Industries’, in J. N. Kendnek and

    Google Scholar 

  • B. N. Vaccaras (eds), New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis, Chicago, 111.: University of Chicago Press, pp. 359–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAN POTTELSBERGHE DE LA POTTERIE, B. (1997) ‘Issues in Assessing the Effect of Interindustry R&D Spillovers’, Economic Systems Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 331–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHITE, H. (1980) ‘A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity’, Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 817–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLFF, E. N. and NADR, M. I. (1993) ‘Spillover Effects, Linkage Structure, and Research and Development’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 315–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Aija Leiponen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leiponen, A. (2002). Why Do Firms Not Collaborate? The Role of Competencies and Technological Regimes. In: Kleinknecht, A., Mohnen, P. (eds) Innovation and Firm Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595880_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics