Abstract
Determinants and effects of innovation are topics of intense research interest, particularly since the fundamental relationship between economic and technological change has become acknowledged more widely. As a result, the contributions of research and development activities (R&D) to innovation and industrial evolution, especially in the manufacturing industries are well appreciated. However, in economic models, as well as in many empirical studies, R&D is often conceptualized as an innovation production function. Such treatment may be a useful first approximation of the innovation process within a linear model of innovation. However, in qualitative empirical studies since the 1980s it has been observed that the organization of R&D is a critical determinant of both innovation (for example, Mowery, 1983) and economic performance (for example, Teece, 1986). Informal models of innovation emphasize feedbacks and complementarities among a firm’s activities and knowledge bases (Kline and Rosenberg, 1986; Rothwell, 1994). Organizational choices, for instance, whether to organize knowledge-creation activities internally or outsource them, have a considerable impact on the strength of the interactions among the necessary sources of knowledge.
I am grateful for the comments by the participants of the TSER Workshop on Innovation and Economic Change at Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands, especially Pierre Mohnen, Chris Walters, and Jose M. Labeaga, and comments by seminar participants at INRA, Toulouse and Amos Tuck School, Dartmouth College. Steven Wolf provided valuable editing assistance Remaining errors are mine alone. This research was funded by TEKES, the National Technology Agency of Finland. Statistics Finland compiled the data. I thank both for their support.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ARVANITIS, S. (1999) Generierung von neuem technischem Wissen, Produktivität und Arbeits qualifikation in der schweizerischen Industrie: Eine Querschnitts analyse auf der Basis von Unternehmensdaten, Unpublished dissertation, University of Zurich.
ARVANITIS, S. and HOLLENSTEIN, H. (1996) ‘Industrial Innovation in Switzerland: A Model-based Analysis with Survey Data’, in A. Kleinknecht (ed.), Determinants of Innovation. The Message from New Indicators, London: Macmillan, pp. 13–62.
ARVANITIS, S. and HOLLENSTEIN, H. (1998) ‘Firm Performance, Innovation and Technological Spillovers: A Cross-section Analysis with Swiss Firm Data’, in G. Eliasson, ? Green and C. R. McCann (eds), Microfoundations of Economic Growth. A Schumpeterian Perspective, Ann Harbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press; pp. 271–84.
ARVANITIS, S., FRICK, A., ETTER, R. and HOLLENSTEIN, H. (1992) Innovationsfähigkeit und Innovationsverhalten der Schweizer Industrie, Berne: Bundesamt fiir Konjunkturfragen.
ARVANITIS, D. B. and HELPMAN, E. (1995) ‘International R&D Spillovers’, European Economic Review, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 859–87.
COHEN, W. M. (1995) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity’, in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 182–264.
COHEN, W. M. and LEVINTHAL, D. A. (1989) ‘Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D’, Economic Journal, vol. 99, no. 398, pp. 569–96.
ENGLANDER, A. S., EVENSON, R. and HANAZAKI, M. (1988) ‘R&D, Innovation and Total Factor Productivity’, OECD Economic Studies, no. 11, pp. 156–91.
GEROSKI, P. A. (1995) ‘Do Spillovers Undermine the Incentive to Innovate?’, in S. Dowrick (ed.), Economic Approaches to Innovation, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 76–97.
GOTO, A. and SUZUKI, K. (1989) ‘R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 555–64.
GRILICHES, Z. (1979) ‘Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 92–116.
GRILICHES, Z. (1992) ‘The Search for R&D Spillovers’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 94 (Suppl.), pp. 29–47.
HALL, B. H., GRILICHES, Z. and HAUSMAN, J. A. (1986) ‘Patents and R and D: Is there a Lag?’ International Economic Review, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 265–83.
HALL, B. H. and MAIRESSE, J. (1995) ‘Exploring the Relationship between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 65, no. 1, 263–93.
HARHOFF, D. (1994) ‘Searching for R&D Spillovers among German Manufacturing Firms’, Paper Prepared for the ZEW Workshop on Productivity, R&D and Innovation at the Firm Level, Mannheim, Germany, June 24–25.
HARHOFF, D. (1998) ‘R&D and Productivity in German Manufacturing Firms’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29–49.
JAFFE, A. B. (1986) ‘Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value’, American Economic Review, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 984–1001.
LEVIN, R. ? and REISS, P. ? (1988) ‘Cost-reducing and Demand-creating R&D with Spillovers’, Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 538–56.
MANSFIELD, E. (1985) ‘How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?’, Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 34, pp. 217–23.
MOHNEN, P. (1992) The Relationship between R&D and Productivity Growth in Canada and Other Major Industrialized Countries, Ottawa: Canada Communications Group Publishing.
OECD (1993) Basic Science and Technology Statistics, Paris: OECD.
OECD (1995) Research and Development Expenditure in Industry, 1973–92, Paris: OECD.
PAKES, A. and SCHANKERMAN, M. (1984) ‘The Rate of Obsolescence of Patents, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources’, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, Chicago, 111.: University of Chicago Press, pp. 73–88.
ROGERS, M. (1995) ‘International Knowledge Spillovers: A Cross-Country Study’, in S. Dowrick (ed.), Economic Approaches to Innovation, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 166–88.
SCHANKERMAN, M. (1981) ‘The Effects of Double-Counting and Expensing on the Measured Returns to R&D’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 454–8.
SPENCE, M. (1984) ‘Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance’, Econometrica, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 101–21. Swiss Federal Statistics Office (1993) Swiss R&D Statistics, 1992, Berne: Federal Statistics Office. Swiss Federal Statistics Office (1994) Foreign Trade Statistics, 1994, Berne: Federal Statistics Office.
TERLEKYJ, N. (1980) ‘Direct and Indirect Effects of Industrial Research and Development on the Productivity Growth of Industries’, in J. N. Kendnek and
B. N. Vaccaras (eds), New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis, Chicago, 111.: University of Chicago Press, pp. 359–86.
VAN POTTELSBERGHE DE LA POTTERIE, B. (1997) ‘Issues in Assessing the Effect of Interindustry R&D Spillovers’, Economic Systems Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 331–56.
WHITE, H. (1980) ‘A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity’, Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 817–38.
WOLFF, E. N. and NADR, M. I. (1993) ‘Spillover Effects, Linkage Structure, and Research and Development’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 315–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Aija Leiponen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leiponen, A. (2002). Why Do Firms Not Collaborate? The Role of Competencies and Technological Regimes. In: Kleinknecht, A., Mohnen, P. (eds) Innovation and Firm Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595880_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595880_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42718-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59588-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)