Skip to main content

Friedrich Schiller and the Aestheticizing of Sentiment

  • Chapter
Sentimentalism, Ethics and the Culture of Feeling
  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

Schiller’s attempt to resolve the contradictions of sentiment produced one of the best accounts we have of the relation of the moral and the aesthetic. His immediate point of departure was Kant. Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason (1788), along with his Grounding for a Metaphysics of Morals (1785), had provided a radical criticism of the tradition of moral sentiment including the notion of moral sense. He argued that morality is a ‘categorical imperative’ independent of feeling so that, even if an impulse of feeling should lead to moral action, it is only the recognition of the imperative which makes the feeling moral. To speak of ‘moral feeling’, therefore, is at best a potentially misleading shorthand and, since feeling in itself is not merely unreliable, but is actually outside the realm of the ethical, it is dangerous to accept it even as a supplement to the ethical which it may actively undermine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Lewis White Beck (New York: Macmillan, 1993) p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedrich Schiller On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters, Bilingual edition, ed. and trans. Elizabeth M. Wilkinson and L. A. Willoughby (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgement, trans. J. H. Bernard (New York: Hafner, 1972) pp. 140–1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedrich Schiller, ’Über Naiv und Sentimentalische Dichtung’, Sämtliche Werke, ed. Gerhard Fricke and Herbert G. Göpfert, (Munich: Hauser, 1993) vol. v, p. 695.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Translated as On the Naive and Sentimental in Literature by Helen Watanabe-O’Kelly (Manchester: Carcanet, 1981) p. 22. Present translations my own.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Terry Eagleton, The Ideology of the Aesthetic (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990) p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marc Redfield, Phantom Formations: Aesthetic Ideology and the Bildungsroman (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walter Benjamin, Illuminationen (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1955) pp. 174–6;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Walter Benjamin, Illuminations, trans. Harry Zohn (London: Cape, 1970) pp. 243–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See ‘Narration as Action: “Die Bekenntnisse einer schönen Seele” and Angela Carter’s Nights at the Circus’, German Life and Letters, vol. 45, no. 1 (January 1992) 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schiller to Goethe, 17 August 1795. Goethe: Gedenkausgabe, ed. Ernst Beutler (Zurich and Stuttgart: Artemis, 1950–64) vol. 20, p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. H. Stephenson, Goethe’s Wisdom Literature: a Study in Aesthetic Transmutation (Bern and Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1983) p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Letter to H. Meyer, 20 June 1796. Karl Viëtor, Goethe, vol. ii (Bern: Francke, 1949) p. 282.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Letter to Goethe, 7 September 1797. Goethe: Gedenkausgabe, vol. 20, pp. 416–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Michael Bell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bell, M. (2000). Friedrich Schiller and the Aestheticizing of Sentiment. In: Sentimentalism, Ethics and the Culture of Feeling. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595507_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics