Skip to main content

John Ogilby and the Iconographic Roads to a Restored Royalist Geography, c.1660–75

  • Chapter
Enlightenment Geography

Part of the book series: Studies in Modern History ((SMH))

  • 86 Accesses

Abstract

Looking back from the vantage point of 1670, John Ogilby argued that it was the Civil War which had made him a writer: ‘in the first Fluctuations of the late Grand Rebellion, I being left at leisure from former Imployments belonging to the quiet of Peace wherein I was bred, in stead of Arms, to which in parties most began to buckle, I betook my self to something of Literature’.1 This does not mean that Ogilby’s response was that of the quietist, any more than it had been Heylyn’s, but that for both literature became the buckler they donned in the Royalist cause. Both Heylyn and Ogilby participated in a more general movement defending monarchy and Laudian Anglicanism in the Interregnum, the ‘golden age of High Anglican theology and apologetic’. Further, both were at the ‘lower’ end of spectrum of literary aspirations in this golden age, contributing primarily to the ‘host of popular controversial works, now forgotten, but effective propaganda in their day’.2 But where Heylyn’s contributions came in the form of a massive folio geography, Ogilby’s contribution came in Aesopian fables.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert Bosher, The Making of the Restoration Settlement: the Influence of the Laudians 1649–62 (London: Dacre Press, 1951), pp. 36 and 37–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The politics of Ogilby’s Aesopian fables is discussed in Mark Loveridge, A History of Augustan Fable (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 102–41;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jayne Elizabeth Lewis, The English Fable: Aesop and Literary Culture, 1651–1740 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 14–23; and

    Google Scholar 

  4. Annabel Patterson, Fables of Power: Aesopian Writing and Political History (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991), pp. 85–94.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Cited in Katherine Van Eerde, John Ogilby and the Taste of his Times (Folkestone: Dawson Press, 1976), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I.M. Green, The Re-Establishment of the Church of England, 1660–1663 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978), p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence Manley, Literature and Culture in Early Modern London (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See also Roy Strong, Art and Power: Renaissance Festivals, 1450–1650 (Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stephen Orgel, The Illusion of Power: Political Theatre in the English Renaissance (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975); and

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vaughan Hart, Art and Magic in the Court of the Stuarts (London: Routledge, 1994), Chapter 7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Samuel Pepys, Diary, transcribed by Robert Latham and William Matthews (London: G. Bell and Sons, 1970), II 81.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See also Charles Withers, ‘Geography, Royalty and Empire: Scotland and the Making of Great Britain, 1603–1661m’, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 113 (1997), pp. 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. See John Keay, The Honourable Company: a History of the English East India Company (London: Harper Collins, 1991), Chs.1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See David Berkowitz, John Selden’s Formative Years: Politics and Society in Early Seventeenth-Century England (London: Associated University Press, 1988), pp. 51–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steven Pincus, Protestantism and Patriotism: Ideologies and the Making of English Foreign Policy, 1650–1668 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. A distinction was drawn in seventeenth-century political thought between pernicious ‘universal monarchy’ and England’s beneficent commercial empire: but there is no sign that Ogilby’s procession draws such a distinction, simply claiming instead universal monarchy for England. For the distinction: see John Robertson, ‘Gibbon’s Roman Empire as a Universal Monarchy: the Decline and Fall and the Imperial Idea in Early Modern Europe’, in Rosamond McKitterick and Roland Quinault, eds. Edward Gibbon and Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 247–70, at pp. 254–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See also Steven Pincus, ‘The English Debate over Universal Monarchy’ in John Robertson, ed., A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the British Union of 1707 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Richard Tuck, ‘Grotius and Selden’ in J.H. Burns with Mark Goldie, eds, The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 499–529, at pp. 527–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Derek Hirst, ‘The English Republic and the Meaning of Britain’, in Brendan Bradshaw and John Morrill, eds, The British Problem, c.1534–1707: State Formation in the Atlantic Archipelago (London: Macmillan, 1996), pp. 192–219, at pp. 192–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See the balanced discussion in Ronald Hutton, The Restoration: a Political and Religious History of England and Wales 1658–1667 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985), pp. 181 and 288–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paul Seaward, The Cavalier Parliament and the Reconstruction of the Old Regime, 1661–1667 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), Ch. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Those who see elements of absolutism include: J.R. Jones, Charles II: Royal Politician (London: Allen and Unwin, 1987), Ch. 5; and

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maurice Lee, The Cabal (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Those who oppose this view include Ronald Hutton, Charles the Second: King of England, Scotland and Ireland (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), pp. 318–19; and

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. John Miller, ‘The Potential for “Absolutism” in Later Stuart England’, History, 69 (1984) pp. 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ogilby, Africa, br-v. (Original in italics.) See also Cynthia Wall, The Literary and Cultural Spaces of Restoration London (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Van Eerde, Ogilby and the Taste of his Times, p. 151; see also Herbert Fordham, Notes on British and Irish Itineraries and Road Books (Hertford: Stephen Austin Press, 1912), pp. 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Robert J. Mayhew

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayhew, R.J. (2000). John Ogilby and the Iconographic Roads to a Restored Royalist Geography, c.1660–75. In: Enlightenment Geography. Studies in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595491_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595491_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41906-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59549-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics