Skip to main content

Blind Spots on the Map of Aid Allocations: Concentration and Complementarity of International NGO Aid

  • Chapter
Book cover Development Aid

Part of the book series: Studies in Development Economics and Policy ((SDEP))

Abstract

The Central African Republic is an extremely poor, landlocked country where around three million people live below the poverty line. Similarly, Malawi is also a poor country with no access to the sea, and four million poor. One would expect these two countries to receive roughly the same volume of aid from organizations such as CARE, World Vision and Plan. In reality, however, fifty of the world’s largest non-governmental (NGOs) development organizations spend only about €1 million a year on the Central African Republic, compared with more than €80 million for Malawi. This example suggests that there might be countries where aid to NGOs is sparse, and others where it is generous, which causes a concentration of aid. Perhaps NGOs made this choice because official donors were focusing on the Central African Republic? On the contrary: official donors provided Malawi with a sum in excess of €480 million in 2005, compared to only €71 million to the Central African Republic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agg, C. (2006) ‘Trends in Government Support for Nongovernmental Organizations. Is the “Golden Age” of NGO Behind Us?’, Civil Society and Social Movements Programme Paper 23, Geneva: UNRISD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, A. and M. Fafchamps (2005) ‘A Client-Community Assessment of the NGO Sector in Uganda’, Journal of Development Studies, 42 (4): 611–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baulch, B. (2003) ‘Aid for the Poorest? The Distribution and Maldistribution of International Development Assistance’, CPRC Working Paper 35, Manchester: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C. and C. Oliver (1996) ‘Toward an Institutional Ecology of Organizational Founding’, Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5): 1378–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (2004) ‘NGOs and Uneven Development: Geographies of Development Intervention’, Progress in Human Development, 28 (6): 725–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielefeld, W. and J. C. Murdoch (2004) ‘The Locations of Non-profit Organizations and their For-Profit Counterparts: an Exploratory Analysis’, Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33 (2): 221–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brakman, S., H. Garretsen and C. van Marrewijk (2001) An Introduction to Geographical Economics: Trade, Location and Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burnside, C. and D. Dollar (1997) ‘Aid, Policies and Growth’, World Bank Working Paper 1777, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnside, C. and D. Dollar (2000) ‘Aid, Policies and Growth’, American Economic Review, 90 (4): 847–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogneau, D. and J. D. Naudet (2004) ‘Who Deserves Aid? Equality of Opportunity, International Aid and Poverty Reduction’, Working Paper DAIL DT/2004/10, Paris: Unité de Recherche CIPRÉ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. and D. Dollar (2002) ‘Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction’, European Economic Review, 46 (8): 1470–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordaid (2005) ‘Cordaid, Jaarverslag 2004’, Utrecht: Hoonte Bosch and Keuning.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVerteuil, G. (2000) ‘Reconsidering the Legacy of Urban Public Facility Location Theory in Human Geography’, Progress in Human Geography, 24 (1): 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFID (Department for International Development) (2006a) ‘Civil Society and Development’. Available at: www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/civil-society-dev.pdf>. Accessed 16 November 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID (2006b) ‘Eliminating World Poverty: Making Governance Work for the Poor’. Available at: www.dfid.gov.uk/wp2006/. Accessed 16 November 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2002) ‘The Cartel of Good Intentions: The Problem of Bureaucracy in Foreign Aid’. Available at: www.nyu.edu/institute/dri/easterly/file/carteljan2003.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. and D. Hulme (1998) ‘Too Close for Comfort? The Impact of Official Aid on Nongovernment Organizations’, Current Issues in Comparative Education, 1 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. and K. Biekart (1996) ‘Do Private Agencies Really Make a Difference?’ in D. Sogge, K. Biekart and J. Saxby (eds), Compassion and Calculation: The Business of Private Foreign Aid, London: Pluto Press: 107–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P. (1998) ‘Rethinking Public Non-profit Relations: Toward a Neo-Institutional Theory of Public Management’, PONPO Working Paper 248, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruttero, A. and V. Gauri (2005) ‘The Strategic Choices of NGOs: Location Decisions in Rural Bangladesh’, Journal of Development Studies, 41 (5): 759–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronbjerg, K. A. and L. Paarlberg (2001) ‘Community Variations in the Size and Scope of the Non-profit Sector: Theory and Preliminary Findings’, Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30 (4): 684–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. and F. Tarp (2000) ‘Aid Effectiveness Disputed’, Journal of International Development, 12 (3): 375–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmich, H., P. B. Lehning and A. Bernard (eds) (1998) Civil Society and International Development, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, W. and D.-J. Koch (2006) ‘Selectiviteit in het Nederlandse Ontwikkelingsbeleid 1998–2004’ (Selectivity in Dutch Aid Policies 1998–2004), Working paper, Amsterdam: Policy and Operations Evaluations Department, Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joassart-Marcelli, P. and J. R. Wolch (2003) ‘The Intrametropolitan Geography of Poverty and the Non-Profit Sector in Southern California’, Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 32 (1): 70–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, D., C. Lawson, B. Moore and F. Wilkinson (1999) ‘Collective Learning Processes, Networking and “Institutional Thickness” in the Cambridge Region’, Regional Studies, 33 (4): 319–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, D.-J. (2006) ‘Blind Spots on the Map of Aid Allocation: Discovering the Geographies of Civil Society Aid’, Paper presented at the WIDER Development Conference on Aid: Principles, Practices and Performance, 14–16 June, Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, D.-J. and B. Loman (2008) ‘The Geographic Choices of Dutch NGOs’, in P. Hoebink (ed.), Dutch Yearbook of International Cooperation, Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, D. J., J. Westeneng and R. Ruben (2007) ‘Does Marketization of Aid Reduce the Country Poverty Targeting of NGOs?’, European Journal of Development Research, 19 (4): 635–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991) Geography and Trade, Gaston Eyskens Lecture Series, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1998) ‘The Role of Geography in Development’, Paper presented at the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, 20–21 April. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, V. and D. Dollar (2004) ‘Increasing the Selectivity of Foreign Aid’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3299, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R. (1977) ‘The Urban Distribution of Voluntary Organizations’, Social Science Quarterly, 58 (3): 472–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. and S. Smith (1990) ‘Non-Profit Organizations, Government, and the Welfare State’, Political Science Quarterly, 104 (4): 625–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llavador, H. G. and J. E. Roemer (2001) ‘An Equal-Opportunity Approach to the Allocation of International Aid’, Journal of Development Economics, 64 (1): 147–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. (2004) ‘Industrialization in Developing Countries: Some Evidence from a New Economic Geography Perspective’, UNCTAD Discussion Paper 174, Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morosino, P. (2004) ‘Industrial Clusters, Knowledge Integration and Performance’, World Development, 32 (2): 305–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, G. and B. Yontcheva (2006) ‘Does NGO Aid Go to the Poor? Empirical Evidence from Europe’, IMF Working Paper WP 06/39, Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2001a) ‘Civil Society and Poverty Alleviation’, Amsterdam: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2001b) ‘Budget for the Year 2002’, Amsterdam: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2006) ‘Beleidsreactie IOB-evaluatie inzake Sectorale Benadering’, 26 April, Brief aan de Tweede Kamer 30548, nr. 1 [Policy Reaction, IOB Evaluation of the Sectoral Approach, 26 April, Letter to the Parliament 30548, no. 1], The Hague: Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2003) The Pattern of Aid Giving: The Impact of Good Governance on Development Assistance, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. and E. Ostrom (1999) ‘Public Goods and Public Choices’, Paper prepared at the Workshop on Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University. Available at: www//socsci.colorado.edu /~mciverj/ostrom-pg&pc.pdf. Accessed 18 September 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (2000) ‘Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy’, Economic Development Quarterly, 14 (1): 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H. (2003). ‘Rethinking the Policy of Contracting out Social Services to Nongovernment Organizations’, Public Management Review, 5 (3): 307–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steering Group Evaluation Cofinancing Programme (2002) ‘Final Report of the Evaluation of the Cofinancing Programme’, Amsterdam. Available at: www.mfp-breed.nl. Accessed 12 August 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teune, B. and T. Dietz (2003) ‘Hoe de wereld van Novib een stukje kleiner werd’ (How Novib’s World Became Slightly Smaller), Geografie, 12 (3): 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2003) Human Development Report, 2003: Millennium Development Goals: A Compact among Nations to End Human Poverty, New York: Oxford University Press for IJNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Millennium Project (2005) Investing in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the MDGs, New York: UNDP/Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables, A. J. (2001) ‘Trade, Location, and Development: an Overview of Theory’, Paper prepared for the World Bank project ‘Patterns of Integration in the Global Economy’, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. (2006) ‘Money and Autonomy: Patterns of Civil Society Finance and their Implications’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 40 (4): 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. (1988) The Non-Profit Economy, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessa Free Statistics Software. Available on the internet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia: The Free Online Encyclopedia. Available on the internet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. R. and R. K. Geiger (1983) ‘The Urban Distribution of Voluntary Resources: an Exploratory Analysis’, Environment and Planning, A (15): 1067–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1998) Assessing Aid; What Works, What Doesn’t and Why?, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) ‘Engaging Civil Society Organizations in Conflict-Affected and Fragile State. Three African Country Case Studies’, Report 32538-GLB, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yontcheva, B., N. Masud et al. (2005) ‘Does Foreign Aid Reduce Poverty? Empirical Evidence from Nongovernmental and Bilateral Aid’, IMF Working Paper 100, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, M., M. Sharma, A. Ahmed and S. Rashid (2001) ‘Group-based Financial Institutions for the Rural Poor in Bangladesh’, IFPRI Research Report 120, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

George Mavrotas (Chief Economist of the Global Development Network (GDN)Mark McGillivray (Chief Economist of the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID)

Copyright information

© 2009 United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koch, DJ. (2009). Blind Spots on the Map of Aid Allocations: Concentration and Complementarity of International NGO Aid. In: Mavrotas, G., McGillivray, M. (eds) Development Aid. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595163_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics