Skip to main content

Measuring Pro-Poor Progress Towards the Non-Income Millennium Development Goals

  • Chapter
Achieving the Millennium Development Goals

Part of the book series: Studies in Development Economics and Policy ((SDEP))

  • 163 Accesses

Abstract

More than half of the time period to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) has passed and much effort has been undertaken to achieve the goals by 2015. However, the latest progress report towards the MDGs shows that progress is often very slow and, more worrisome, in some countries there have been reverses, particularly among the poor (UN 2005). This leads to a crucial question concerning the progress made so far: how is the progress towards the MDGs distributed within a country? Have the very poor benefited disproportionately compared with the less-poor or even the non-poor from improvements in reducing both the income and non-income dimension of poverty? To reach the MDGs, it will be critical that both the development path and the policies to accomplish the goals are pro-poor (UN 2003). Thus these questions have to be considered when monitoring progress towards the MDGs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anand, S. and M. Ravallion (1993) ‘Human Development in Poor Countries: On the Role of Private Incomes and Public Services’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (1): 133–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. and A. Brandolini (2004) ‘Global World Inequality: Absolute, Relative or Intermediate’. Paper presented at the 28th General Conference of the International Association in Income and Wealth, 22–28 August, Cork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F. and S. Chakravarty (2003) ‘The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty’. Journal ofEconomic Inequality, 1 (1): 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1997) The Analysis of Household Surveys. A Microeconomic Approach to Development Policy. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J. and Q. Wodon (2004)‘What Is Pro Poor?’ Centre Interuniversitaire sur le Risque, les Politiques Économiques et l’Emploi (CIRPEE) Working Paper 04–25. Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filmer, D. and L. Prichett (1998) ‘Estimating Wealth Effects without Expenditure Data—or Tears: An Application to Educational Enrollments in States of India’. Demography, 38 (1): 115–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, M. (2007) ‘Removing the Anonymity Axiom in Assessing Pro-Poor Growth’. Journal of Economic Inequality, 5 (2): 179–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, M., C. Guénard and S. Mesplé-Somps (2002) ‘What Has Happened to the Urban Population in Côte d’Ivoire since the Eighties? An Analysis of Monetary Poverty and Deprivation over 15 years of Household Data’. World Development, 30 (6): 1073–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, M., K. Harttgen and S. Klasen (2008) ‘Measuring Pro-Poor Growth in Non-Income Dimensions’. World Development, 36 (6): 1021–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, M., S. Klasen and J. Spatz (2005) ‘Creating National Poverty Profiles and Growth Incidence Curves With Incomplete Income or Consumption Expenditure Data’. Background paper for the study: Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth—Country Case Study Bolivia. Ibero America Institute for Economic Research, University of Göttingen, Discussion Paper 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, S. (2000) ‘Measuring Poverty and Deprivation in South Africa’. Review of Income and Wealth, 46 (1): 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, S. (2004) ‘In Search of the Holy Grail. How to Achieve Pro-Poor Growth?’. In B. Tungodden and N. Stern (eds), Towards Pro-Poor Policies: Proceedings from the ABCDE Europe. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, S. (2008) ‘Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction: Measurement Issues in Income and Non-Income Dimensions’. World Development (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, S., R. Thiele, M. Grosse, J. Lay, J. Spatz and M. Wiebelt (2007) ‘Analysing Pro-poor Growth in Bolivia: Addressing Data Gaps and Modelling Policy Choices’. In M. Grimm, S. Klasen and A. McKay (eds), Determinants of Pro-Poor Growth. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 191–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, P. and M. Ravallion (1998)‘Benefit Incidence and the Timing of Program Capture’. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montes, C. (2003) ‘Results-Based Public Management in Bolivia’. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper 202. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, D. (2001) ‘Measuring Multidimensional Deprivation’. Mathematical Social Sciences, 42 (3): 233–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2001)‘Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Looking Beyond Averages’. World Development, 29(11): 1803–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. and S. Chen (2003) ‘Measuring Pro-Poor Growth’. Economics Letters, 78 (1): 93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2003) ‘Poverty Reduction Outcomes in Education and Health: Public Expenditure and Aid’. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper 210. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahn, D. and D. Stifel (2003) ‘Exploring Alternative Measures of Welfare in the Absence of Expenditure Data’. Review of Income and Wealth, 49 (4): 463–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1988) ‘The Concept of Development’. In H. Chenery and T. Srinivasan (eds), Handbook of Development Economics, vol 1. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1998) Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summer, A. (2003)‘Economic and Non-Economic Wellbeing: A Review of Progress on the Meaning and Measurement of Poverty’. Paper prepared for WIDER Conference: Inequality, Poverty and Human Wellbeing, 30–31 May. Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (United Nations) (2000a) A Better World for All. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (United Nations) (2000b) ‘United Nations Millennium Declaration’. Document A/RES55/2. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (United Nations) (2003) ‘Getting Serious about Meeting the Millennium Development Goals: A Comprehensive Development Framework Progress Report’. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (United Nations) (2005) ‘The Millennium Development Goals Report 2005’. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, D. and K. Nead (eds) (1995) Public Spending and the Poor—Theory and Evidence. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. and E. Anderson (2000) ‘Growth versus Distribution: Does the Pattern of Growth Matter?’ Development Policy Review, 19 (3): 267–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization) (1995)‘Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry’. Technical Report Series 854. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000) World Development Report 2000/01—Attacking Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2006) World Development Report 2006—Equity and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grosse, M., Harttgen, K., Klasen, S. (2008). Measuring Pro-Poor Progress Towards the Non-Income Millennium Development Goals. In: McGillivray, M. (eds) Achieving the Millennium Development Goals. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594937_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics