Skip to main content

German Climate Policy Between Global Leadership and Muddling Through

  • Chapter
Turning Down the Heat

Abstract

Germany was one of the first countries in the world to embark on a process of defining concrete policy options to deal with climate change. The Parliamentary Enquiry Commission Protection of the Earth’s Atmosphere was established in 1987, and its first report (Enquete-Kommission 1990) was a milestone in the analysis of potential climate policy measures, setting the tone for subsequent discussions in Germany. Climate policy has been an issue of considerable political importance in Germany ever since. German politicians have repeatedly proclaimed that Germany is a frontrunner in climate protection (Gabriel 2006) and German Chancellors have used this claim to stake out a leading role in international climate negotiations. Despite this, research on German climate policy is surprisingly sparse (exceptions include Michaelowa 2003; Bailey and Rupp 2004), although specific elements of German policy, such as negotiated agreements and ecological taxes, have attracted more attention (Bailey and Rupp 2005; Bailey 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bailey, I. (2007), ‘Market environmentalism, new environmental policy instruments, and climate policy in the United Kingdom and Germany’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97, 530–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, I. and S. Rupp (2004), ‘Politics, industry and the regulation of industrial greenhouse-gas emissions in the UK and Germany’, European Environment 14, 235–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, I. and S. Rupp (2005), ‘Geography and climate policy: a comparative assessment of new environmental policy instruments in the UK and Germany’, Geoforum 36, 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BDI (Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie) (2005), ‘Entwurf—Wettbewerbsfeld globaler Klimaschutz: deutsche Kernkompetenzen optimal nutzen’, Positionspapier, Stand 25.10.2005, Cologne: BDI.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit) (2006a), Results of Energy Summit, http://www.bmu.de/files/erneuerbare energien/downloads/application/pdf/energiegipfel ergebnisse.pdf [20 October 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU (2006b), Demonstrable Progress Report: 2006 Report under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Berlin: BMU.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU (2006c), Poster on Economic Benefits of Climate Protection, http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/plakat klimaschutz01.pdf [20 October 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU (2007a), Effects of German 2007 Climate Policy Programme, http://www.bmu.de/klimaschutz/downloads/doc/40259.php/ [10 November 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU (2007b), Integrated Energy and Climate Programme, http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/klimapaket aug2007 en.pdf [10 October 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU (2007c), Legal Documents Regarding Allocation of EUAllowances for 2008–2012 in Germany, http://www.bmu.de/emissionshandel/downloads/doc/39620.php [20 October 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU (2007d), Erfahrungsbericht 2007 zum Erneuerbare Energien-Gesetz, Berlin: BMU.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMWi (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie) (2004), CO2- Vermeidungskosten im Kraftwerksbereich, bei den erneuerbaren Energien sowie bei nachfrageseitigen Energieeffizienzmaßnahmen, http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Redaktion/PDF/Publikationen/Studien/co2-vermeidungskosten-im-kraftwerksbereich-bei-den-erneuerbaren-energien, property=pdf, bereich=bmwi, sprache= de,rwb=true.pdf [30 October 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • BMWi (2007), National Action Plan on Energy Efficiency, http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Redaktion/PDF/E/nationaler-energieeffizienz-aktionsplan,property=pdf, bereich=bmwi,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf [30 October 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • BMWi, BMU and BMBF (2007), Joint Declaration on CCS, http://www.bmu.de/klimaschutz/downloads/doc/39998.php [30 October 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavender-Bares, J. and J. Jäger (2001), ‘Developing a precautionary approach: Global environmental risk management in Germany’, in Clark, W., J. Jäger, J. van Eijndhoven and N. Dickson (eds), Learning to Manage Environmental Risks: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain, Boston: MIT Press, pp. 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Bundestag (2000), ‘Nationales Klimaschutzprogramm. Fünfter Bericht der Interministeriellen Arbeitsgruppe CO2-Reduktion’, Drucksache 14/4729, Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Bundestag (2005), ‘Nationales Klimaschutzprogramm. Sechster Bericht der Interministeriellen Arbeitsgruppe CO2-Reduktion’, Drucksache 15/5931, Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Umwelthilfe (2005), Rauchzeichen aus der klimapolitischen Steinzeit, www.duh.de/uploads/media/DUH-Hintergrund-BDI-Klimapapier final 01. pdf [10 October 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • Enquete-Kommission (1990), ‘Vorsorge zum Schutz der Erdatmosphäre’; des Deutschen Bundestages, Schutz der Erde. Eine Bestandsaufnahme mit Vorschlägen zu einer neuen Energiepolitik, Bonn: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council setting Emission Performance Standards for New Passenger Vehicles as part of the Community’s Integrated Approach to reduce CO2 Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles, COM(2007) 856 final, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Environmental Agency (2007), National Inventory Report 1990–2005, Dessau: Federal Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foljanty-Jost, G. and K. Jacob (2004), ‘The climate change policy network in Germany’, European Environment 14, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FORSA (2005), Poll on Public Views on Climate Policy, http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/klimaschutz forsa.pdf [15 October 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, S. (2006), Germany Remains at the Forefront of Climate Protection, http://www.bmu.de/english/emissions trading/current/doc/37401.php [20 October 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, R. (2007), ‘Climate change and knowledge politics’, Environmental Politics 16, 414–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henke, J., G. Klepper and N. Schmitz (2005), ‘Tax exemption for biofuels in Germany: Is bio-ethanol really an option for climate policy?’ Energy 30, 2617–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, S. and V. Lauber (2006), ‘The politics and policy of energy system transformation: Explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology’, Energy Policy 34, 256–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, J. (2007), ‘Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom’, Energy Policy 35, 5481–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinsen, D., J. Linssen, P. Markewitz and S. V¨ogele (2007), ‘CCS: a future CO2 mitigation option for Germany? A bottom-up approach’, Energy Policy 35, 2110–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey and Company (2007), Costs and Potentials of Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Germany, Cologne: McKinsey and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, A. (2003), ‘Germany—a pioneer on earthen feet?’ Climate Policy 3, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, A. (2005a), ‘The German wind energy lobby: How to promote costly technological change successfully’, European Environment 15, 192–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, A. (2005b), ‘Carbon capture and geological storage research—a capture by fossil fuel interests?’ in Sugiyama, T. (ed.), Governing Climate: The Struggle for a Global Framework beyond Kyoto, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development, pp. 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W. (2001), ‘Wachstum—Energie—Klima: Wirtschaftspolitik im Spannungsfeld’, Speech at Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, 29 June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polixea Portal (2007), Klimaschutz erneut Topthema der Fernsehnachrichten, Infomonitor März 2007, www.polixea-portal.de/infomonitor [1 July 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesohl, S. and K. Kristof (2001), ‘The Declaration of German Industry on Global Warming Prevention: A dynamic analysis of current performance and future prospects for development’, Journal of Cleaner Production 9, 437–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santarius, T. and H. Ott (2002), ‘Meinungen in der deutschen Industrie zur Einführung eines Emissionshandels’, Wuppertal Paper 122, Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleich, J., W. Eichhammer, U. Boede, F. Gagelmann, E. Jochem, B. Schlomann and H. -J. Ziesing (2001), ‘Greenhouse gas reductions in Germany: lucky strike or hard work?’ Climate Policy 1, 363–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, K. and R. Sands (2006), ‘Innovative energy technologies and climate policy in Germany’, Energy Policy 34, 3929–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner, T. (2007), ‘Fuel taxes: an important instrument for climate policy’, Energy Policy 35, 3194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Str¨obele, W., B. Hillebrand, A. Smajgl, E.-C. Meyer and J.-M. Beringer (2002), Emissionshandel auf dem Prüfstand, Hannover: Universität Hannover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viebahn, P., J. Nitsch, M. Fischedick, A. Esken, D. Schüwer, N. Supersberger, U. Zuberbühler and O. Edenhofer (2007), ‘Comparison of carbon capture and storage with renewable energy technologies regarding structural, economic, and ecological aspects in Germany’, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 1, 121–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz, R. (2007), ‘The role of regulation for sustainable infrastructure innovations: the case of wind energy’, International Journal of Public Policy 2, 57–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wille, J. (2003), ‘Die Killer der Ökosteuer. Die Klima-Selbstverpflichtung’, Frankfurter Rundschau, 12 November 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel, R., A. Jordan, A. Zito and L. Brückner (2003), ‘From high regulatory state to social and ecological market economy? “New” environmental policy instruments in Germany’, in Jordan, A., R. Wurzel and A. Zito (eds), ‘New’ Instruments of Environmental Governance: National Experiences and Prospects, London: Frank Cass, pp. 115–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Axel Michaelowa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michaelowa, A. (2008). German Climate Policy Between Global Leadership and Muddling Through. In: Compston, H., Bailey, I. (eds) Turning Down the Heat. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594678_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics