Skip to main content

The European Union and the Politics of Multi-Level Climate Governance

  • Chapter
Turning Down the Heat

Abstract

While the European Union (EU) is a prominent player in the politics of climate change, it is neither a state nor an international organization in the traditional sense. Rather, it operates as a proactive and authoritative regional collective of affluent democracies that can influence policymaking in significant ways at the regional and international levels. This unique position also means that EU policy-making is subject to multiple pressures from both these levels. Despite – and possibly because of – this, the EU proudly promotes its collective efforts as an exemplar of how to tackle climate change through a combination of international and regional commitments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andresen, S. and S. Agrawala (2002), ‘Leaders, pushers and laggards in the making of the climate regime’, Global Environmental Change 12, 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APP (Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate) (2008), ‘Introduction’, www.asiapacificpartnership.org/ [13 January 2008].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, I. (2007), ‘Neoliberalism, climate governance and the scalar politics of EU emissions trading’, Area 39, 431–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betz, R., K. Rogge and J. Schleich (2006), ‘EU emissions trading: an early analysis of national allocation plans for 2008–2012’, Climate Policy 6, 361–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, M. (2006), ‘Environmental consequences of enlargement’, in Roy, J. and R. Dominguez (eds), Towards the Completion of Europe, Coral Gables, Miami: European Union Center, pp. 237–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (2000), ‘Why there is no “southern problem”. On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 7, 141–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cass, L. (2005), ‘Norm entrapment and preference change: the evolution of the European Union position on international emissions trading’, Global Environmental Politics 5, 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, A. and J. Wettestad (2003), ‘The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed?’ Climate Policy 3, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damro, C. and P. Luaces Méndez (2003), ‘Emissions trading at Kyoto: from EU resistance to Union innovation’, Environmental Politics 12 (2), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbeke, J. (ed.) (2006), EU Environmental Law: The EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme, EU Energy Law Vol. IV, Leuven, Belgium: Claeys and Casteels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005), EU Emissions Trading: An Open Scheme Promoting Global Innovation, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006), ‘Countering climate change’, EU Insight, Special EU Advertising Supplement, Delegation of the European Commission to the USA, October 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007), ‘EU Action against climate change: leading global action to 2020 and beyond’, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008), ‘Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the effort of member states to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community’s greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020’, Brussels, 23.1.2008 COM(2008) 17 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2007), ‘Climate change: EU welcomes agreement to launch formal negotiations on a global climate regime for post-2012’, Press Release, Bali/Brussels, 15 December, Reference: MEMO/07/588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldirova, R. (2007), ‘Focus on renewables: EU plans to boost green energy take shape’, www.EUObserver.com [21 December 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, M. and K. Neuhoff (2006), ‘Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview’, Climate Policy 6, 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, M. and F. Yamin (2001), ‘Climatic collapse at The Hague: what happened, why, and where to go from here?’ International Affairs 77, 261–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J. and M. Grubb (eds) (2000), Climate Change and European Leadership. A Sustainable Role for Europe? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J. and L. Ringius (2001), ‘The EU’s climate leadership: reconciling ambition and reality’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1, 281–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, C., M. Grubb, K. Neuhoff, F. Matthes and M. Tse (2006), ‘Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why?’ Climate Policy 6, 137–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. (ed.) (2005), Environmental Policy in the European Union, second edition, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. and A. Schout (2006), The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kubosova, L. (2008a), ‘Brussels accused of ignoring social concerns in climate bill’, www.EUObserver.com [15 January 2008].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubosova, L. (2008b), ‘EU admits biofuel target problems’, www.EUObserver.com [14 January 2008].

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, T. (2007), ‘An EU outlook on the future of the Kyoto Protocol’, The International Spectator 42, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenschow, A. (2005), ‘Environmental policy’, in Wallace, H., W. Wallace and M. Pollack (eds), Policy-making in the European Union, fifth edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 305–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisowski, M. (2002), ‘Playing the two-level game: US President Bush’s decision to repudiate the Kyoto Protocol’, Environmental Politics 11, 101–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, S. (2005), ‘The choice of multiple or single auctions in emissions trading’, Climate Policy 5, 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massai, L. (2007), ‘Climate change policy and the enlargement of the EU’, in Harris, P. (ed.), Europe and Global Climate Change, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 305–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S. and J. Richardson (1992), ‘Environmental groups and the EC: challenges and opportunities’, Environmental Politics 1 (4), 109–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, J. (2001), Environmental Policy in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, A. (1998), ‘Impact of interest groups on EU climate policy’, European Environment 8, 152–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberthür, S. (2006), ‘The climate change regime: interactions with ICAO, IMO, and the EU Burden-Sharing Agreement’, in Oberthür, S. and T. Gehring (eds), Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberthür, S. and D. Tänzler (2007), ‘Climate policy in the EU: international regimes and policy diffusion’, in Harris, P. (ed.), Europe and Global Climate Change, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 255–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbragia, A. (1998), ‘Institution-building from below and above: the European Community in global environmental politics’, in Sandholtz, W. and A. Stone Sweet (eds), European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 283–303.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skodvin, T. and S. Andresen (2006), ‘Leadership revisited’, Global Environmental Politics 6, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R. (2003), ‘The US’s retreat from the Kyoto Protocol: an account of a policy change and its implications for future climate policy’, European Environment 13, 344–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, J. (2005), ‘Europe and global environmental governance’, International Affairs 81, 835–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, R. and G. Robinson (2005), ‘The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS)’, Climate Policy 5, 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettestad, J. (2005), ‘The making of the 2003 EU Emissions Trading Directive: an ultra-quick process due to entrepreneurial proficiency?’ Global Environmental Politics 5, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, S., A. Haxeltine, W. Kersten and M. Berk (2005), ‘Towards a long-term European strategy on climate change policy’, Climate Policy 5, 244–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woerdman, E. (2004), ‘Path-dependent climate policy: the history and future of emissions trading in Europe’, European Environment 14, 261–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zito, A. (2005), ‘The European Union as an environmental leader in a global environment’, Globalizations 2, 363–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Chad Damro and Donald MacKenzie

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Damro, C., Mackenzie, D. (2008). The European Union and the Politics of Multi-Level Climate Governance. In: Compston, H., Bailey, I. (eds) Turning Down the Heat. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594678_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics